Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-10703-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-10703-2014
11 Jul 2014
 | 11 Jul 2014
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Evaluation of carbon stocks in above- and below-ground biomass in Central Africa: case study of Lesio-louna tropical rainforest of Congo

X. Liu, R. Ekoungoulou, J. J. Loumeto, S. A. Ifo, Y. E. Bocko, and F. E. Koula

Abstract. The study was aimed to estimate the carbon stocks of above- and below-ground biomass in Lesio-louna forest of Congo. The methodology of allometric equations was used to measure the carbon stocks of Lesio-louna natural forest. We are based precisely on the model II which is also called non-destructive method or indirect method of measuring carbon stocks. While there has been use of parameters such as the DBH and wood density. The research was done with 22 circular plots each 1256 m2. In the 22 plots studied, 19 plots are in the gallery forest and three plots in the secondary forest. Also, 22 circular plots were distributed in 5 sites studies of Lesio-louna forest, including: Inkou forest island, Iboubikro, Ngoyili, Blue lake and Ngambali. So, there are two forest types (secondary forest and gallery forest) in this forest ecosystem. In the 5 sites studied, we made measurements on a total of 347 trees with 197 trees for the class of 10–30 cm diameter, 131 trees for the class of 30–60 cm diameter and 19 trees in the diameter class > 60 cm. The results show that in the whole forest, average carbon stock for the 22 plots of the study was 168.601 t C ha−1 for AGB, or 81% and 39.551 t C ha−1 for BGB, or 19%. The total carbon stocks in all the biomass was 3395.365 t C for AGB, which is 3.395365 × 10–6 Gt C and 909.689934 t C for BGB, which was 9.09689934 × 10–7 Gt C. In this forest, the carbon stock was more important in AGB compared to BGB with respectively 3395.365 t C against 909.689934 t C. Plot10 (AGB = 363.899 t C ha−1 and BGB = 85.516 t C ha−1) was the most dominant in terms of carbon quantification in Lesio-louna.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
X. Liu, R. Ekoungoulou, J. J. Loumeto, S. A. Ifo, Y. E. Bocko, and F. E. Koula

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
X. Liu, R. Ekoungoulou, J. J. Loumeto, S. A. Ifo, Y. E. Bocko, and F. E. Koula
X. Liu, R. Ekoungoulou, J. J. Loumeto, S. A. Ifo, Y. E. Bocko, and F. E. Koula

Viewed

Total article views: 1,769 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,100 580 89 1,769 59 74
  • HTML: 1,100
  • PDF: 580
  • XML: 89
  • Total: 1,769
  • BibTeX: 59
  • EndNote: 74
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jul 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jul 2014)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Altmetrics