the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
226Ra and 228Ra in the stratified estuary of the Krka River (Adriatic Sea, Croatia): implications for submarine groundwater discharge and its derived nutrients
Abstract. We conducted a field survey in the Krka River and its estuary (Croatia) in September 2014 to study the significance of submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) and derived nutrients. During the sampling period, the exchange time of the brackish water above the halocline in the Krka River Estuary (KRE) was calculated to be 8.3 ± 3.5 days. Three approaches of three end-member model, mass balance model and time series observation in tidal period based on Ra isotopes were used to evaluate the SGD fluxes in the KRE surface layer. We estimated the SGD flux to be (1.3–7.8) × 105 m3 d−1, which was approximately 2.7–16.1 % of the Krka River discharge into the estuary. By establishing the nutrient budgets in the KRE surface layer, SGD dominated the nutrient sources, followed by Krka River. SGD-derived dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and dissolved orthosilicate (DSi) contributed 26.8–68.6 % and 9.5–38.3 % to the total DIN and DSi fluxes into the surface waters of KRE, respectively. This indicates that SGD was likely a major external source of those nutrients in the KRE. We have identified that SGD-derived nutrients and their high N : P ratios may affect the ecosystem productivity in the KRE and nearby Adriatic.
This preprint has been retracted.
-
Retraction notice
This preprint has been retracted.
-
Preprint
(2382 KB)
Interactive discussion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf08e/cf08e471eb31ab8e7fafb1d845a6e182c8661e07" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f973d/f973d72f1cc61c03a6db358cea8eb74314226c0c" alt="Supplement"
-
RC1: 'Ra manuscript', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Aug 2017
-
AC1: 'Author Response to RC1 comments', Jinzhou Du, 08 Nov 2017
-
AC1: 'Author Response to RC1 comments', Jinzhou Du, 08 Nov 2017
-
RC2: 'Comments', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Sep 2017
-
AC2: 'Author Response to RC2 comments', Jinzhou Du, 08 Nov 2017
-
AC2: 'Author Response to RC2 comments', Jinzhou Du, 08 Nov 2017
Interactive discussion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf08e/cf08e471eb31ab8e7fafb1d845a6e182c8661e07" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f973d/f973d72f1cc61c03a6db358cea8eb74314226c0c" alt="Supplement"
-
RC1: 'Ra manuscript', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Aug 2017
-
AC1: 'Author Response to RC1 comments', Jinzhou Du, 08 Nov 2017
-
AC1: 'Author Response to RC1 comments', Jinzhou Du, 08 Nov 2017
-
RC2: 'Comments', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Sep 2017
-
AC2: 'Author Response to RC2 comments', Jinzhou Du, 08 Nov 2017
-
AC2: 'Author Response to RC2 comments', Jinzhou Du, 08 Nov 2017
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,081 | 431 | 63 | 1,575 | 64 | 79 |
- HTML: 1,081
- PDF: 431
- XML: 63
- Total: 1,575
- BibTeX: 64
- EndNote: 79
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1