Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-393
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-393
22 Nov 2019
 | 22 Nov 2019
Status: this discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Biogeosciences (BG). The manuscript was not accepted for further review after discussion.

On surface fluxes at night – the virtual chamber approach

Bruce B. Hicks, Nebila Lichiheb, Deb L. O'Dell, Joel Oetting, Neal S. Eash, Mark Heuer, and Latoya Myles

Abstract. Quantification of the emission rates of various gases from soils at night remains a challenge, confronting climate science (in the case of CO2 and CH4) and agriculture science (for NH3 and N2O, among others). In the stable conditions prevailing at night, concentrations of such emitted gases build up at the surface during the night, with intermittent interruptions commonly attributed to the passage of packets of turbulence. The utility of conventional micrometeorological experimental methods in such circumstances is questionable, and chamber methods have been developed to meet the challenge. Here, a statistical approach is proposed, in which micrometeorological field data are used to replicate the likely characteristics of a chamber experiment, yielding estimates of surface fluxes at the surface itself and not at some height above it. The methodology proposed is developmental at this time, with details intended to correspond to the use of both closed and vented chambers. Its application to three recent field studies is explored: (1) a study of nocturnal CO2 emission from two test areas (one previously tilled and the other not) in Ohio in 2015; (2) a similar experiment conducted in Zimbabwe in 2013 (one area previously tilled and a second left fallow), and (3) an investigation of NH3 effluxes from a crop previously treated with urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), in Illinois in 2014. There are few measurements with which to compare the results presented here, however the values obtained are within the range of available field data.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Bruce B. Hicks, Nebila Lichiheb, Deb L. O'Dell, Joel Oetting, Neal S. Eash, Mark Heuer, and Latoya Myles
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Bruce B. Hicks, Nebila Lichiheb, Deb L. O'Dell, Joel Oetting, Neal S. Eash, Mark Heuer, and Latoya Myles
Bruce B. Hicks, Nebila Lichiheb, Deb L. O'Dell, Joel Oetting, Neal S. Eash, Mark Heuer, and Latoya Myles

Viewed

Total article views: 902 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
636 209 57 902 44 45
  • HTML: 636
  • PDF: 209
  • XML: 57
  • Total: 902
  • BibTeX: 44
  • EndNote: 45
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Nov 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Nov 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 832 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 829 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Altmetrics