Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-4-1059-2007
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-4-1059-2007
04 Apr 2007
 | 04 Apr 2007
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal BG. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Predicting the global warming potential of agro-ecosystems

S. Lehuger, B. Gabrielle, E. Larmanou, P. Laville, P. Cellier, and B. Loubet

Abstract. Nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide and methane are the main biogenic greenhouse gases (GHG) contributing to the global warming potential (GWP) of agro-ecosystems. Evaluating the impact of agriculture on climate thus requires a capacity to predict the net exchanges of these gases in an integrated manner, as related to environmental conditions and crop management. Here, we used two year-round data sets from two intensively-monitored cropping systems in northern France to test the ability of the biophysical crop model CERES-EGC to simulate GHG exchanges at the plot-scale. The experiments involved maize and rapeseed crops on a loam and rendzina soils, respectively. The model was subsequently extrapolated to predict CO2 and N2O fluxes over an entire crop rotation. Indirect emissions (IE) arising from the production of agricultural inputs and from cropping operations were also added to the final GWP. One experimental site (involving a wheat-maize-barley rotation on a loamy soil) was a net source of GHG with a GWP of 350 kg CO2-C eq ha−1 yr−1, of which 75% were due to IE and 25% to direct N2O emissions. The other site (involving an oilseed rape-wheat-barley rotation on a rendzina) was a net sink of GHG for –250 kg CO2-C eq ha−1 yr−1, mainly due to a higher predicted C sequestration potential and C return from crops. Such modelling approach makes it possible to test various agronomic management scenarios, in order to design productive agro-ecosystems with low global warming impact.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
S. Lehuger, B. Gabrielle, E. Larmanou, P. Laville, P. Cellier, and B. Loubet
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
S. Lehuger, B. Gabrielle, E. Larmanou, P. Laville, P. Cellier, and B. Loubet
S. Lehuger, B. Gabrielle, E. Larmanou, P. Laville, P. Cellier, and B. Loubet

Viewed

Total article views: 1,337 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
835 427 75 1,337 80 54
  • HTML: 835
  • PDF: 427
  • XML: 75
  • Total: 1,337
  • BibTeX: 80
  • EndNote: 54
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Altmetrics