Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-4-3913-2007
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-4-3913-2007
25 Oct 2007
 | 25 Oct 2007
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal BG but the revision was not accepted.

Copepod feeding and reproduction in relation to phytoplankton development during the PeECE III mesocosm experiment

Y. Carotenuto, S. Putzeys, P. Simonelli, A. Paulino, M. Meyerhöfer, K. Suffrian, A. Antia, and J. C. Nejstgaard

Abstract. Within the frame of the Pelagic Ecosystem CO2 Enrichment (PeECE III) experiment, reproduction and feeding of the copepod Calanus finmarchicus was monitored in relation to phytoplankton development in two mesocosms, at present 1× (350 μatm) and ca 3× present (1050 μatm) CO2 concentrations, respectively. Both mesocosms showed rapid phytoplankton growth after the initial nutrient additions and reached maximum chlorophyll (Chl) a concentrations around day 10. Flow-cytometry and specific pigment analysis (HPLC-CHEMTAX), showed that diatoms and prymnesiophyceae (Emiliania huxleyi (Ehux) and other nanoplankton) dominated the biomass. Feeding and egg production rates of C. finmarchicus developed similarly in both mesocosms, and were positively correlated with Chla, Ehux, diatom and prymnesiophyceae concentrations. Although the total number of copepod nauplii recruited during the experiment was similar in 1× and 3×, significantly less nauplii were recruited in 3× during the peak of the bloom compared to in 1×. We conclude that the algae responsible for the higher biomass in 3× during the peak of the bloom (diatoms and Ehux), may have been relatively inferior food for C. finmarchicus naupliar recruitment, possibly due to a high C:N ratio (>8). Nevertheless, the 3 fold increase in CO2 concentration did not show any clear overall effect on bulk phytoplankton or zooplankton development over the whole experiment, suggesting a more complex coupling between increased CO2 and the nutritional status of the system.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Y. Carotenuto, S. Putzeys, P. Simonelli, A. Paulino, M. Meyerhöfer, K. Suffrian, A. Antia, and J. C. Nejstgaard
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Y. Carotenuto, S. Putzeys, P. Simonelli, A. Paulino, M. Meyerhöfer, K. Suffrian, A. Antia, and J. C. Nejstgaard
Y. Carotenuto, S. Putzeys, P. Simonelli, A. Paulino, M. Meyerhöfer, K. Suffrian, A. Antia, and J. C. Nejstgaard

Viewed

Total article views: 1,694 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,046 578 70 1,694 66 48
  • HTML: 1,046
  • PDF: 578
  • XML: 70
  • Total: 1,694
  • BibTeX: 66
  • EndNote: 48
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Download
Altmetrics