Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-5-4481-2008
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-5-4481-2008
26 Nov 2008
 | 26 Nov 2008
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal BG. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Characterisation of ecosystem water-use efficiency of european forests from eddy covariance measurements

F. G. Kuglitsch, M. Reichstein, C. Beer, A. Carrara, R. Ceulemans, A. Granier, I. A. Janssens, B. Koestner, A. Lindroth, D. Loustau, G. Matteucci, L. Montagnani, E. J. Moors, D. Papale, K. Pilegaard, S. Rambal, C. Rebmann, E. D. Schulze, G. Seufert, H. Verbeeck, T. Vesala, M. Aubinet, C. Bernhofer, T. Foken, T. Grünwald, B. Heinesch, W. Kutsch, T. Laurila, B. Longdoz, F. Miglietta, M. J. Sanz, and R. Valentini

Abstract. Water-use efficiency (WUE) has been recognized as an important characteristic of vegetation productivity in various natural scientific disciplines for decades, but only recently at the ecosystem level, where different ways exist to characterize water-use efficiency. Hence, the objective of this research was (a) to systematically compare different ways of calculating ecosystem water-use efficiency (WUEe) from eddy-covariance measurements, (b) quantify the diurnal, seasonal and interannual variability of WUEe in relation to meteorological conditions, and (c) analyse between-site variability of WUEe as affected by vegetation type and climatic conditions, across sites in European forest ecosystems.

Day-to-day variability of gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) were more strongly coupled than net ecosystem production (NEP) and ET, obviously because NEP also depends on the respiration that is not heavily coupled to water fluxes. However, the slope of daytime NEP versus ET (mNEP) from half-hourly measurements of a single day may also be used as a WUEe-estimate giving very similar results to those of the GPP-ET slope (mGPP), since the diurnal variation is dominated by GPP. Since ET is the sum of transpiration (linked to GPP) and evaporation from wet vegetation and soil surfaces (not linked to GPP) we expected that WUEe is increasing when days after rain are excluded from the analysis. However only very minor changes were found, justifying an analysis of WUEe related to vegetation type.

In most of the studied ecosystems the instantaneous WUEGPP was quite sensitive to diurnally varying meteorological conditions and tended to decline from the morning to the afternoon by more than 50% because of increasing vapour pressure deficits (VPD).

Seasonally, WUEGPP increased with a rising monthly precipitation sum and rising average monthly temperatures up to a threshold of 11, 14 and 18°C in boreal, temperate and Mediterranean ecosystems, respectively. Across all sites, the highest monthly WUEGPP-values were detected at times of positive anomalies of summer-precipitation. During drought periods with high temperatures, high VPD, little precipitation and low soil water content, the water-use efficiency of gross carbon uptake (WUEGPP) tended to decrease in all forest types because of a stronger decline of GPP compared to ET.

However the largest variation of growing season WUEGPP was found between-sites and significantly related to vegetation type: WUEGPP was highest in ecosystems dominated by deciduous trees ranging from 5.0 g CO2 kg H2O−1 for temperate broad-leaved deciduous forests (TD), to 4.5 for temperate mixed forests (TM), 3.5 for temperate evergreen conifers (TC), 3.4 for Mediterranean broad-leaved deciduous forests (MD), 3.3 for Mediterranean broad-leaved evergreen forests (Mbeg), 3.1 for Mediterranean evergreen conifers (MC), 2.9 for boreal evergreen conifers (BC) and only 1.2 g CO2 kg H2O−1 for a boreal wetland site (BT). Although vegetation type and meteorology co-vary, the WUEGPP variation was hardly related to meteorology, as we could show by comparing similar meteorological conditions only. Furthermore we compared across-site WUEGPP only under conditions when the 10% high GPP rates were exhibited. The between site differences remained, and at all sites ecosystem reached higher WUEGPP levels under this condition. This means when vegetation is most productive usually it also maximises the amount of carbon gained per water lost.

Overall our results show that water-use efficiency exhibits a strong time-scale dependency in the sense that at longer time-scale meteorological conditions play a smaller role compared to shorter time scale. Moreover, we highlight the role of vegetation in determining carbon-water relation at ecosystem level. Consequently, all predictions of changing carbon-water cycle under changing climate should take into this role and the differences between vegetation types. These results show the strong time-scale dependency of water-use efficiency

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
F. G. Kuglitsch, M. Reichstein, C. Beer, A. Carrara, R. Ceulemans, A. Granier, I. A. Janssens, B. Koestner, A. Lindroth, D. Loustau, G. Matteucci, L. Montagnani, E. J. Moors, D. Papale, K. Pilegaard, S. Rambal, C. Rebmann, E. D. Schulze, G. Seufert, H. Verbeeck, T. Vesala, M. Aubinet, C. Bernhofer, T. Foken, T. Grünwald, B. Heinesch, W. Kutsch, T. Laurila, B. Longdoz, F. Miglietta, M. J. Sanz, and R. Valentini
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
F. G. Kuglitsch, M. Reichstein, C. Beer, A. Carrara, R. Ceulemans, A. Granier, I. A. Janssens, B. Koestner, A. Lindroth, D. Loustau, G. Matteucci, L. Montagnani, E. J. Moors, D. Papale, K. Pilegaard, S. Rambal, C. Rebmann, E. D. Schulze, G. Seufert, H. Verbeeck, T. Vesala, M. Aubinet, C. Bernhofer, T. Foken, T. Grünwald, B. Heinesch, W. Kutsch, T. Laurila, B. Longdoz, F. Miglietta, M. J. Sanz, and R. Valentini
F. G. Kuglitsch, M. Reichstein, C. Beer, A. Carrara, R. Ceulemans, A. Granier, I. A. Janssens, B. Koestner, A. Lindroth, D. Loustau, G. Matteucci, L. Montagnani, E. J. Moors, D. Papale, K. Pilegaard, S. Rambal, C. Rebmann, E. D. Schulze, G. Seufert, H. Verbeeck, T. Vesala, M. Aubinet, C. Bernhofer, T. Foken, T. Grünwald, B. Heinesch, W. Kutsch, T. Laurila, B. Longdoz, F. Miglietta, M. J. Sanz, and R. Valentini

Viewed

Total article views: 4,172 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,626 1,468 78 4,172 71 85
  • HTML: 2,626
  • PDF: 1,468
  • XML: 78
  • Total: 4,172
  • BibTeX: 71
  • EndNote: 85
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Altmetrics