247 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Dynamic Stability of Soil Carbon: Reassessing the “Permanence” of Soil Carbon Sequestration K. Dynarski et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.514701
2. Microbial Models for Simulating Soil Carbon Dynamics: A Review A. Chandel et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007436
3. Jena Soil Model (JSM v1.0; revision 1934): a microbial soil organic carbon model integrated with nitrogen and phosphorus processes L. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-783-2020
4. Social dynamics within decomposer communities lead to nitrogen retention and organic matter build-up in soils C. Kaiser et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9960
5. Microbial lifestyles driven by C: N stoichiometric imbalance govern responses of carbon metabolism to nitrogen addition B. Kang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2026.110162
6. Direct evidence for microbial-derived soil organic matter formation and its ecophysiological controls C. Kallenbach et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13630
7. Using plant, microbe, and soil fauna traits to improve the predictive power of biogeochemical models E. Fry et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13092
8. Multi 'omics comparison reveals metabolome biochemistry, not microbiome composition or gene expression, corresponds to elevated biogeochemical function in the hyporheic zone E. Graham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.256
9. The Carbon Transfer From Plant to Soil Is More Efficient in Less Productive Ecosystems X. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007727
10. Nitrogen Fertilizer Suppresses Mineralization of Soil Organic Matter in Maize Agroecosystems N. Mahal et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00059
11. Dual, differential isotope labeling shows the preferential movement of labile plant constituents into mineral‐bonded soil organic matter M. Haddix et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13237
12. Dispersal-Based Microbial Community Assembly Decreases Biogeochemical Function E. Graham & J. Stegen https://doi.org/10.3390/pr5040065
13. Integrating plant litter quality, soil organic matter stabilization, and the carbon saturation concept M. Castellano et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12982
14. Biomass and biofuel crop effects on biodiversity and ecosystem services in the North Central US D. Landis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.02.003
15. Improved global-scale predictions of soil carbon stocks with Millennial Version 2 R. Abramoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108466
16. Microbial necromass carbon and nitrogen persistence are decoupled in agricultural grassland soils K. Buckeridge et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00439-0
17. Explicitly representing soil microbial processes in Earth system models W. Wieder et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005188
18. On Upscaling of Soil Microbial Processes and Biogeochemical Fluxes From Aggregates to Landscapes A. Ebrahimi & D. Or https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JG004347
19. Microbial dynamics and soil physicochemical properties explain large‐scale variations in soil organic carbon H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14994
20. AMPSOM: A measureable pool soil organic carbon and nitrogen model for arable cropping systems I. Tougma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106291
21. High microbial diversity stabilizes the responses of soil organic carbon decomposition to warming in the subsoil on the Tibetan Plateau M. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15553
22. How to adequately represent biological processes in modeling multifunctionality of arable soils H. Vogel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-024-01802-3
23. MiPrime: A model for the microbially mediated impacts of organic amendments on measurable soil organic carbon fractions and associated priming effects D. Kok et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109618
24. Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon Mineralization Under Straw Addition: Evidence from a Controlled Incubation Experiment X. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15112642
25. Climate Effects on Subsoil Carbon Loss Mediated by Soil Chemistry A. Possinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04909
26. Soil C and N models that integrate microbial diversity B. Louis et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-016-0571-5
27. Urban Grassland Management Implications for Soil C and N Dynamics: A Microbial Perspective G. Thompson & J. Kao-Kniffin https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00315
28. Microbial Controls on the Biogeochemical Dynamics in the Subsurface M. Thullner & P. Regnier https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2019.85.9
29. Model formulation of microbial CO2 production and efficiency can significantly influence short and long term soil C projections F. Ballantyne IV & S. Billings https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0085-1
30. Metabolic tradeoffs and heterogeneity in microbial responses to temperature determine the fate of litter carbon in simulations of a warmer world G. Pold et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4875-2019
31. Carbon Use Efficiency and Its Temperature Sensitivity Covary in Soil Bacteria G. Pold et al. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02293-19
32. Emerging multiscale insights on microbial carbon use efficiency in the land carbon cycle X. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52160-5
33. Responses of two nonlinear microbial models to warming and increased carbon input Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-887-2016
34. Identifying Data Needed to Reduce Parameter Uncertainty in a Coupled Microbial Soil C and N Decomposition Model M. Saifuddin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006593
35. Eco‐Evolutionary Optimality in Soil Organic Matter Models E. Schwarz et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70278
36. Ecological and functional effects of fungal endophytes on wood decomposition L. Cline et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12949
37. A Continental‐Scale Estimate of Soil Organic Carbon Change at NEON Sites and Their Environmental and Edaphic Controls J. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG006981
38. A new approach to continuous monitoring of carbon use efficiency and biosynthesis in soil microbes from measurement of CO2 and O2 K. Smart et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-87-2025
39. Soil organic carbon is not just for soil scientists: measurement recommendations for diverse practitioners S. Billings et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2290
40. At the Nexus of History, Ecology, and Hydrobiogeochemistry: Improved Predictions across Scales through Integration J. Stegen https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00167-17
41. Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter C. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14781
42. Mechanisms for Retention of Low Molecular Weight Organic Carbon Varies with Soil Depth at a Coastal Prairie Ecosystem J. McFarland et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3955839
43. An evaluation of carbon indicators of soil health in long-term agricultural experiments D. Liptzin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108708
44. Spatial and temporal turnover of soil microbial communities is not linked to function in a primary tropical forest S. Kivlin & C. Hawkes https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2985
45. Linear two-pool models are insufficient to infer soil organic matter decomposition temperature sensitivity from incubations J. Tang & W. Riley https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-020-00678-3
46. Modeling biochar effects on soil organic carbon on croplands in a microbial decomposition model (MIMICS-BC_v1.0) M. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024
47. A Model of the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Soil Carbon Following Coastal Wetland Loss Applied to a Louisiana Salt Marsh in the Mississippi River Deltaic Plain D. Schoolmaster et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG006807
48. The implications of microbial and substrate limitation for the fates of carbon in different organic soil horizon types of boreal forest ecosystems: a mechanistically based model analysis Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4477-2014
49. 土壤温<bold>、</bold>湿度调控土壤呼吸过程的参数化进展及趋势 澄. 王 & 祥. 冯 https://doi.org/10.1360/SSTe-2024-0295
50. Response to ‘Stochastic and deterministic interpretation of pool models’ B. Waring et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15580
51. Fungal Traits That Drive Ecosystem Dynamics on Land K. Treseder & J. Lennon https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00001-15
52. Sporadic P limitation constrains microbial growth and facilitates SOM accumulation in the stoichiometrically coupled, acclimating microbe–plant–soil model G. Pold et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108489
53. Soil organic carbon fractions under conventional and no-till management: Insights from legacy total SOC data supported by process-based modelling G. Mara et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2026.128237
54. When and why microbial-explicit soil organic carbon models can be unstable E. Schwarz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3441-2024
55. Microbial growth rate is a stronger predictor of soil organic carbon than carbon use efficiency X. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-025-02961-8
56. Plant roots stimulate the decomposition of complex, but not simple, soil carbon J. Moore et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13510
57. Knowns and unknowns of the soil fungal necrobiome P. Kennedy & F. Maillard https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2022.08.011
58. Plant litter traits control microbial decomposition and drive soil carbon stabilization J. Ridgeway et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108857
59. Microbial models with minimal mineral protection can explain long-term soil organic carbon persistence D. Woolf & J. Lehmann https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43026-8
60. Life and death in the soil microbiome: how ecological processes influence biogeochemistry N. Sokol et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00695-z
61. Nonlinear microbial thermal response and its implications for abrupt soil organic carbon responses to warming K. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57900-9
62. Soil Biodiversity Integrates Solutions for a Sustainable Future E. Bach et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072662
63. The relationships between heavy metals and bacterial communities in a coal gangue site B. Kou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121136
64. Is the fate of glucose-derived carbon more strongly driven by nutrient availability, soil texture, or microbial biomass size? C. Creamer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.025
65. Allocation and turnover of rhizodeposited carbon in different soil microbial groups J. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107973
66. Pangenomes suggest ecological-evolutionary responses to experimental soil warming M. Choudoir et al. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00059-25
67. KEYLINK: towards a more integrative soil representation for inclusion in ecosystem scale models. I. review and model concept G. Deckmyn et al. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9750
68. Improving Soil Carbon Estimates by Linking Conceptual Pools Against Measurable Carbon Fractions in the DAYCENT Model Version 4.5 S. Dangal et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002622
69. Next-generation soil monitoring: linking metagenomics, biosensors, and ecological modeling for sustainable agriculture R. Romero-Arguelles et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1861333
70. Sustained microbial reorganization after 30 years of variations in litter deposition underpins the persistence of soil organic matter molecular classes I. Wrightson et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5VA00350D
71. Legume Cover Crop Contributions to Ecological Nutrient Management in Upper Midwest Vegetable Systems S. Perrone et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.712152
72. Coupling of microbial-explicit model and machine learning improves the prediction and turnover process simulation of soil organic carbon X. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csag.2024.100001
73. Land‐use legacies regulate decomposition dynamics following bioenergy crop conversion C. Kallenbach & A. Stuart Grandy https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12218
74. Simulating the land carbon sink: Progresses and challenges of terrestrial ecosystem models W. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110264
75. Biological mechanisms may contribute to soil carbon saturation patterns M. Craig et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15584
76. A Microbial‐Explicit Soil Organic Carbon Decomposition Model (MESDM): Development and Testing at a Semiarid Grassland Site X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002485
77. Design and performance of micro-zone C diffusion device to explore the importance of distance for soil microorganisms to utilize available exogenous carbon source L. Yu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105494
78. Soil carbon cycling proxies: Understanding their critical role in predicting climate change feedbacks V. Bailey et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13926
79. Lifting the Profile of Deep Forest Soil Carbon L. Garrett et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8040105
80. Modelling the dynamic physical protection of soil organic carbon: Insights into carbon predictions and explanation of the priming effect Z. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13793
81. Fast-decaying plant litter enhances soil carbon in temperate forests but not through microbial physiological traits M. Craig et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28715-9
82. Changes in interannual climate sensitivities of terrestrial carbon fluxes during the 21st century predicted by CMIP5 Earth System Models Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003124
83. Effects of Microbial-Mineral Interactions on Organic Carbon Stabilization in a Ponderosa Pine Root Zone: A Micro-Scale Approach A. Dohnalkova et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.799694
84. Carbon acquisition ecological strategies to connect soil microbial biodiversity and carbon cycling E. Morrissey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108893
85. Variation in Temperature Dependences across Europe Reveals the Climate Sensitivity of Soil Microbial Decomposers C. Cruz-Paredes et al. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02090-22
86. Mechanistic Microbial Death Pathways Improve Regional Soil Carbon Simulations across Diverse Cropland Ecosystems W. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c16652
87. Modeling demographic-driven vegetation dynamics and ecosystem biogeochemical cycling in NASA GISS's Earth system model (ModelE-BiomeE v.1.0) E. Weng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8153-2022
88. Representing Organic Matter Thermodynamics in Biogeochemical Reactions via Substrate-Explicit Modeling H. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.531756
89. Modeling Global Soil Carbon and Soil Microbial Carbon by Integrating Microbial Processes into the Ecosystem Process Model TRIPLEX‐GHG K. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000920
90. Slowed decomposition in ectomycorrhizal ecosystems is independent of plant chemistry C. Averill https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.003
91. Title: Plant Litter Traits Control Microbial Decomposition and Drive Soil Carbon Stabilization J. Ridgeway et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4101155
92. Can models adequately reflect how long-term nitrogen enrichment alters the forest soil carbon cycle? B. Eastman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-201-2024
93. Decomposition of olive-mill waste compost, goat manure and Medicago sativa in Lebanese soils as measured using the litterbag technique Z. Al Chami et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR15023
94. Ecological stoichiometry as a foundation for omics-enabled biogeochemical models of soil organic matter decomposition E. Graham & K. Hofmockel https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-021-00851-2
95. Model behavior of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: predicting soil carbon dynamics under climate change K. Treseder https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2015-0245
96. Stoichiometrically coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling in the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization model version 1.0 (MIMICS-CN v1.0) E. Kyker-Snowman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4413-2020
97. Molecular and Microscopic Insights into the Formation of Soil Organic Matter in a Red Pine Rhizosphere A. Dohnalkova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/soils1010004
98. Microbial community-level regulation explains soil carbon responses to long-term litter manipulations K. Georgiou et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01116-z
99. Substrate quality and concentration control decomposition and microbial strategies in a model soil system J. Schnecker et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00571-8
100. Distinct Assembly Processes and Microbial Communities Constrain Soil Organic Carbon Formation M. Anthony et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.03.006
101. Stoichiometric and structural uncertainty in soil food web models R. Buchkowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13706
102. Soil Macroinvertebrate Presence Alters Microbial Community Composition and Activity in the Rhizosphere N. Bray et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00256
103. Temperature sensitivity of ecoenzyme kinetics driving litter decomposition: The effects of nitrogen enrichment, litter chemistry, and decomposer community X. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107878
104. The re-imagining of a framework for agricultural land use: A pathway for integrating agricultural practices into ecosystem services, planetary boundaries and sustainable development goals J. Moore https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01483-w
105. Soil carbon dynamics shape bacterial communities across grassland and agricultural soils with implications for phosphorus P. Banerjee et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2026.1756894
106. Growth rate as a link between microbial diversity and soil biogeochemistry M. Foley et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02520-7
107. Progress and perspective in parameterizing soil respiration responses to temperature and moisture C. Wang & X. Feng https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-024-1554-y
108. Soil Functional Zone Management: A Vehicle for Enhancing Production and Soil Ecosystem Services in Row-Crop Agroecosystems A. Williams et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00065
109. Soil organic matter accumulation in relation to changing soil volume, mass, and structure: Concepts and calculations P. Sollins & J. Gregg https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.04.013
110. Vertically Divergent Responses of SOC Decomposition to Soil Moisture in a Changing Climate M. Pallandt et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006684
111. Simulating measurable ecosystem carbon and nitrogen dynamics with the mechanistically defined MEMS 2.0 model Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3147-2021
112. Weak interactions between strong interactors in an old‐field ecosystem: Control of nitrogen cycling by coupled herbivores and detritivores R. Buchkowski & O. Schmitz https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13932
113. Microbiological indicators of soil carbon dynamics M. Semenov https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2025-124-116-143
114. Global soil organic carbon changes and economic revenues with biochar application M. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12915
115. Embracing the dynamic nature of soil structure: A paradigm illuminating the role of life in critical zones of the Anthropocene P. Sullivan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103873
116. SAMM version 1.0: a numerical model for microbial- mediated soil aggregate formation M. Laub et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-931-2024
117. Denitrification and the challenge of scaling microsite knowledge to the globe G. Robertson https://doi.org/10.1002/mlf2.12080
118. Applying population and community ecology theory to advance understanding of belowground biogeochemistry R. Buchkowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12712
119. Particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon turnover revealed by modelling their long-term dynamics X. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108780
120. Aging exo-enzymes can create temporally shifting, temperature-dependent resource landscapes for microbes S. Billings et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0273-x
121. Microtopographic differences in soil properties and microbial community composition at the field scale N. Suriyavirun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.12.024
122. Temperature sensitivities of extracellular enzymeVmaxandKmacross thermal environments S. Allison et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14045
123. Challenges in mechanistic modeling of methane production and release in agricultural soils: Perspective on limitations and opportunities S. Beegum et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2026.2612932
124. Faster than expected: release of nitrogen and phosphorus from decomposing woody litter B. Wijas et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20362
125. Large variability of soil microbial diversity and functions in an over 20-year old Eucalyptus grandis plantation M. Brondani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106008
126. Methodological uncertainty in estimating carbon turnover times of soil fractions W. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.06.003
127. Unifying soil organic matter formation and persistence frameworks: the MEMS model A. Robertson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1225-2019
128. Microbial physiology and necromass regulate agricultural soil carbon accumulation C. Kallenbach et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.005
129. Temperature controls production but hydrology regulates export of dissolved organic carbon at the catchment scale H. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-945-2020
130. Divergent controls of soil organic carbon between observations and process-based models K. Georgiou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-021-00819-2
131. Microbial biomass – not diversity – drives soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization in Spanish holm oak ecosystems E. Bruni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117408
132. Increasing the spatial and temporal impact of ecological research: A roadmap for integrating a novel terrestrial process into an Earth system model E. Kyker‐Snowman et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15894
133. Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root exudates M. Keiluweit et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2580
134. SUPECA kinetics for scaling redox reactions in networks of mixed substrates and consumers and an example application to aerobic soil respiration J. Tang & W. Riley https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3277-2017
135. Improved model simulation of soil carbon cycling by representing the microbially derived organic carbon pool X. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-00914-0
136. The Roles of Invertebrates in the Urban Soil Microbiome N. Bray & K. Wickings https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00359
137. Aligning theoretical and empirical representations of soil carbon-to-nitrogen stoichiometry with process-based terrestrial biogeochemistry models K. Rocci et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109272
138. Diverse microbial communities show uniform respiration response to nitrogen addition in simulated early-stage leaf litter decomposition experiments R. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-026-01322-2
139. Modeling ecosystem-scale carbon dynamics in soil: The microbial dimension J. Schimel https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.108948
140. Genomic Features Predict Bacterial Life History Strategies in Soil, as Identified by Metagenomic Stable Isotope Probing S. Barnett et al. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03584-22
141. Modeling adaptation of carbon use efficiency in microbial communities S. Allison https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00571
142. KEYLINK: towards a more integrative soil representation for inclusion in ecosystem scale models—II: model description, implementation and testing O. Flores et al. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10707
143. Radiocarbon analysis reveals underestimation of soil organic carbon persistence in new-generation soil models A. Brunmayr et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5961-2024
144. Organic Carbon Sequestration by Secondary Fe–Mn Complex Minerals via the Anoxic Redox Reaction of Fe(II) and Birnessite S. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c12756
145. Trophic level mediates soil microbial community composition and function J. Lucas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107756
146. Organo–organic and organo–mineral interfaces in soil at the nanometer scale A. Possinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19792-9
147. From pools to flow: The PROMISE framework for new insights on soil carbon cycling in a changing world B. Waring et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15365
148. Multisubstrate DNA stable isotope probing reveals guild structure of bacteria that mediate soil carbon cycling S. Barnett et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115292118
149. Microbial-explicit processes and refined perennial plant traits improve modeled ecosystem carbon dynamics D. Berardi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116851
150. Interplay between temperature and redox conditions regulates wetland biogeochemistry and greenhouse gas emissions L. Ho et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180413
151. Nutrients cause consolidation of soil carbon flux to small proportion of bacterial community B. Stone et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23676-x
152. Minerals, microbes and melanin drive differential incorporation of fungal necromass carbon and nitrogen into mineral-associated organic matter K. Beidler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109843
153. Representing life in the Earth system with soil microbial functional traits in the MIMICS model W. Wieder et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1789-2015
154. Collembola (Isotomidae) and mowing management practices control distinct aspects of thatch decomposition in a lawn mesocosm experiment H. Bock & K. Wickings https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150896
155. Unimodal productivity–diversity relationships among bacterial communities in a simple polar soil ecosystem K. Geyer & J. Barrett https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14639
156. Arctic Soil Governs Whether Climate Change Drives Global Losses or Gains in Soil Carbon W. Wieder et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085543
157. Non-monotonic and distinct temperature responses of respiration of soil microbial functional groups Z. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107902
158. Beyond microbes: Are fauna the next frontier in soil biogeochemical models? A. Grandy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.008
159. Varying effects of stream restoration on riparian soil carbon persistence and methane emissions in the southern Rocky Mountains, United States A. Krichels et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70423
160. Competition alters predicted forest carbon cycle responses to nitrogen availability and elevated CO2: simulations using an explicitly competitive, game-theoretic vegetation demographic model E. Weng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4577-2019
161. Modelling the effect of climate–substrate interactions on soil organic matter decomposition with the Jena Soil Model M. Pallandt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1907-2025
162. How do soil microbes shape ecosystem biogeochemistry in the context of global change? E. Abs et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16331
163. 21 Tesla Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometer Greatly Expands Mass Spectrometry Toolbox J. Shaw et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-016-1507-9
164. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome N. Fierer https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87
165. Modern Development of Soil Organic Matter Dynamics Models (Review) I. Ryzhova et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687424700467
166. Reviews and syntheses: Ironing out wrinkles in the soil phosphorus cycling paradigm C. McConnell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5309-2020
167. Quantifying the fate of nitrogen from cereal rye root and shoot biomass using 15N R. Roth et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-022-10213-5
168. Using explainable AI to diagnose the representation of environmental drivers in process-based soil organic carbon models L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-7845-2025
169. Divergent carbon use efficiency-growth rate tradeoff in popular biological growth models J. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-3995-2026
170. Kinetic Properties of Microbial Exoenzymes Vary With Soil Depth but Have Similar Temperature Sensitivities Through the Soil Profile R. Alves et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.735282
171. Terrestrial and marine perspectives on modeling organic matter degradation pathways A. Burd et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12987
172. The Millennial model: in search of measurable pools and transformations for modeling soil carbon in the new century R. Abramoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0409-7
173. Testing microbial models with data from a 14C glucose tracer experiment S. Hagerty et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108781
174. Reducing Interdisciplinary Roadblocks Through Multi‐Network Collaboration on Plant–Microbial Interactions H. Andres et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.70060
175. Nitrogen-rich compounds constitute an increasing proportion of organic matter with depth in Oi-Oe-Oa-A horizons of temperate forests A. Fine et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.02.039
176. An assessment of cumulative CO2 efflux as proxy of organic matter turnover time in the soil priming effect: analysis using the lumped parameter approach T. Sengupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05569-w
177. Cover crop root contributions to soil carbon in a no‐till corn bioenergy cropping system E. Austin et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12428
178. Spatio-temporal heterogeneity in extracellular enzyme activities tracks variation in saprotrophic fungal biomass in a temperate hardwood forest M. Midgley & R. Phillips https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107600
179. Microbial necromass as the central architect of soil carbon: Reconciling plant inputs, microbial processing, and mineral stabilization in a critical synthesis H. Etesami https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scca.2026.100221
180. Modeling Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics Across Land Uses in Tropical Andean Ecosystems V. Mondragón Valencia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14122425
181. Integrating Microbial Community Data Into an Ecosystem‐Scale Model to Predict Litter Decomposition in the Face of Climate Change K. Rocci et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70352
182. A Mechanistic Model of Microbially Mediated Soil Biogeochemical Processes: A Reality Check S. Fatichi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006077
183. Temperature effects on carbon storage are controlled by soil stabilisation capacities I. Hartley et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27101-1
184. Contrasting effects of maize litter and litter-derived biochar on the temperature sensitivity of paddy soil organic matter decomposition J. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1008744
185. ORCHIMIC (v1.0), a microbe-mediated model for soil organic matter decomposition Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2111-2018
186. Modern development of soil organic matter dynamics models (review) I. Ryzhova et al. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0137-0944-17-2024-79-4-122-129
187. Pairing litter decomposition with microbial community structures using the Tea Bag Index (TBI) A. Daebeler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-163-2022
188. Grass invasion effects on forest soil carbon depend on landscape‐level land use patterns M. Craig et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1770.1
189. Litter and soil characteristics mediate the buffering effect of snow cover on litter decomposition S. Ibanez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04803-x
190. Climate indices as predictors of global soil organic carbon stocks Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353676.2024.2335000
191. 21st‐century biogeochemical modeling: Challenges for Century‐based models and where do we go from here? D. Berardi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12730
192. Al-bearing minerals as the primary loci for the sequestration of microbial necromass carbon in soils J. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2026.110189
193. Moisture-driven divergence in mineral-associated soil carbon persistence K. Heckman et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210044120
194. Investigating microbial transformations of soil organic matter: synthesizing knowledge from disparate fields to guide new experimentation S. Billings et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-313-2015
195. The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry T. Crowther et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0550
196. Modeling the Role of Root Exudation in Critical Zone Nutrient Dynamics S. Roque‐Malo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026606
197. Leveraging traits for insight into the fungal ecology of burned ecosystems J. Hopkins & A. Bennett https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70008
198. Microbial carbon use efficiency: accounting for population, community, and ecosystem-scale controls over the fate of metabolized organic matter K. Geyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0191-y
199. Dynamic parameterization of the nutrient resorption process in forest ecosystems with a hybrid model L. Hua et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2026.100453
200. Controls on Soil Organic Carbon Partitioning and Stabilization in the California Sierra Nevada C. Rasmussen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2030041
201. Leveraging the signature of heterotrophic respiration on atmospheric CO2 for model benchmarking S. Basile et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1293-2020
202. Significant role of microbial nitrogen use efficiency in regulating long-term soil carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-026-01985-x
203. Mechanisms for retention of low molecular weight organic carbon varies with soil depth at a coastal prairie ecosystem J. McFarland et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108601
204. Unraveling flood dynamics at sub-daily time scales in semi-arid to arid basins in south Morocco M. Rachdane et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-07022-0
205. Multiple models and experiments underscore large uncertainty in soil carbon dynamics B. Sulman et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0509-z
206. Bioenergy crop Miscanthus x giganteus acts as an ecosystem engineer to increase bacterial diversity and soil organic matter on marginal land J. Kane et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109178
207. Grazing enhances belowground carbon allocation, microbial biomass, and soil carbon in a subtropical grassland C. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14070
208. Bacterial community dynamics explain carbon mineralization and assimilation in soils of different land‐use history S. Barnett et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16146
209. Microbial assemblies associated with temperature sensitivity of soil respiration along an altitudinal gradient X. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153257
210. Process-Based Modeling of Forest Soil Carbon Dynamics M. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16101579
211. Ectomycorrhizal mediation of soil carbon sequestration: from carbon allocation to necromass stabilization and priming effects Y. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1865735
212. Response of Soil Organic Carbon Components in Pinus yunnanensis Stand to Altitude Variation B. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010004
213. Extracellular enzyme kinetics and thermodynamics along a climate gradient in southern California N. Baker & S. Allison https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.07.005
214. More replenishment than priming loss of soil organic carbon with additional carbon input J. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05667-7
215. A Bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical models H. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4043-2020
216. C-STABILITY an innovative modeling framework to leverage the continuous representation of organic matter J. Sainte-Marie et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21079-6
217. A review on modelling forest biogeochemistry and the coupled forest – soil interactions in a changing world F. Sauke et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106381
218. A soil food web approach to integrate soil fauna into multitrophic biogeochemistry J. Lejoly et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03322-4
219. Emergent properties of organic matter decomposition by soil enzymes B. Wang & S. Allison https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107522
220. Evidence for the existence and ecological relevance of fast-cycling mineral-associated organic matter A. Jilling et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02681-8
221. Enhanced soil organic carbon estimation via hybrid modeling: A data-driven solution to carbon inputs Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.117739
222. Distinct Source Water Chemistry Shapes Contrasting Concentration‐Discharge Patterns W. Zhi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024257
223. Assessing the response of soil carbon in Australia to changing inputs and climate using a consistent modelling framework J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5185-2021
224. Dynamics of Fungal and Bacterial Biomass Carbon in Natural Ecosystems: Site‐Level Applications of the CLM‐Microbe Model L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002283
225. Constraining Carbon and Nutrient Flows in Soil With Ecological Stoichiometry R. Buchkowski et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00382
226. Clarifying the evidence for microbial‐ and plant‐derived soil organic matter, and the path toward a more quantitative understanding E. Whalen et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16413
227. The path from root input to mineral-associated soil carbon is dictated by habitat-specific microbial traits and soil moisture N. Sokol et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109367
228. Eco-evolutionary controls of microbial extracellular enzyme production in soils E. Schwarz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2026.110211
229. Microbial seasonality promotes soil respiratory carbon emission in natural ecosystems: A modeling study L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15627
230. Molecular Determination of Organic Adsorption Sites on Smectite during Fe Redox Processes Using ToF-SIMS Analysis L. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08407
231. Increasing organic stocks in agricultural soils: Knowledge gaps and potential innovations C. Chenu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04.011
232. Litter-, soil- and C:N-stoichiometry-associated shifts in fungal communities along a subtropical forest succession Z. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.03.037
233. Nitrogen recycling in coupled green and brown food webs: Weak effects of herbivory and detritivory when nitrogen passes through soil R. Buchkowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13079
234. Exploring Trait Trade-Offs for Fungal Decomposers in a Southern California Grassland C. Alster et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.655987
235. Comparing models of microbial–substrate interactions and their response to warming D. Sihi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1733-2016
236. Multi‐decadal time series of remotely sensed vegetation improves prediction of soil carbon in a subtropical grassland C. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1557
237. Advancing integrated terrestrial nutrient budget modeling: Challenges and opportunities for improvement across space, time, and end-users C. Pasut et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103721
238. Invasive plant-derived dissolved organic matter alters microbial communities and carbon cycling in soils M. McLeod et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108191
239. Abiotic and Biotic Controls on Soil Organo–Mineral Interactions: Developing Model Structures to Analyze Why Soil Organic Matter Persists D. Dwivedi et al. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2019.85.11
240. Challenges in integrating dissolved organic matter chemodiversity into kinetic models of soil respiration A. Chakrawal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109954
241. Microbial community regulation of extracellular enzyme production can mediate patterns of particulate and mineral-associated organic matter accumulation in undersaturated soils P. Hansen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.110056
242. The changing faces of soil organic matter research P. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12500
243. Enhanced predictions of measurable soil carbon pools in the Australian rangelands with the Millennial v2 model M. Zhang & R. Viscarra Rossel https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.117811
244. Carbon cycle confidence and uncertainty: Exploring variation among soil biogeochemical models W. Wieder et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13979
245. Leveraging observed soil heterotrophic respiration fluxes as a novel constraint on global‐scale models J. Jian et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15795
246. ANIMAL MANURE AS FERTILIZER: CHANGES IN SOIL ATTRIBUTES, PRODUCTIVITY AND FOOD COMPOSITION A. Loss et al. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i9.2019.615
247. Soil Phosphorus Dynamics are an Overlooked but Dominant Control on Mineral‐Associated Organic Matter H. Lieberman et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70307