42 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Soil incubation study showed biogas digestate to cause higher and more variable short‐term N2O and N2 fluxes than mineral‐N C. Buchen-Tschiskale et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201900075
2. Value addition and risk assessment of dairy digestate as biofertilizer on crop yield and soil fertility S. Mukhtar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09354-8
3. Effects of Biogas Digestate on Winter Wheat Yield, Nitrogen Balance, and Nitrous Oxide Emissions under Organic Farming Conditions F. Winkhart et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081739
4. Short-term effect of pig slurry and its digestate application on biochemical properties of soils and emissions of volatile organic compounds C. Monard et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103376
5. Assessing nitrous oxide emissions and productivity of cropping systems for biogas production using digestate and mineral fertilisation in a coastal marsh site A. Herrmann et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1231767
6. Nutritional Status and Nitrogen Uptake Dynamics of Waxy-Type Winter Wheat Under Liquid Organic Fertilization A. Arlauskienė et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243799
7. Full greenhouse gas balance of silage maize cultivation following grassland: Are no-tillage practices favourable under highly productive soil conditions? I. Struck et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104615
8. Effects of Biogas Slurry, Biochar, and Mineral Fertilizer Co-Application on Net Ecosystem Carbon Balance and Ecosystem Service Value in Greenhouse Farmland Q. Sa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15132087
9. Advanced Processing of Food Waste Based Digestate for Mitigating Nitrogen Losses in a Winter Wheat Crop A. Sánchez-Rodríguez et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00035
10. The effect of application of digestate and agro-food industry sludges on Dystric Cambisol porosity K. Skic et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238469
11. Adaptation of fen peatlands to climate change: rewetting and management shift can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and offset climate warming effects C. Bockermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01113-z
12. A new methodology for organic soils in national greenhouse gas inventories: Data synthesis, derivation and application B. Tiemeyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105838
13. Emissions of nitrous oxide and methane after field application of liquid organic fertilizers and biochar N. Efosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108642
14. Life cycle assessment of anaerobic digestion systems G. Gopal et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-10-2018-0178
15. Livestock-induced N2O emissions may limit the benefits of converting cropland to grazed grassland as a greenhouse gas mitigation strategy for agricultural peatlands Y. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105764
16. Effects of Organic Maize Cropping Systems on Nitrogen Balances and Nitrous Oxide Emissions F. Winkhart et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070907
17. Agricultural Use of Biogas Digestate as a Replacement Fertilizers M. Koszel & E. Lorencowicz https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.004
18. Effect of Solid Digestate Amendment on The Dynamics of N Soluble Forms in Two Contrasting Soil Profiles under Mediterranean Environment G. Badagliacca et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071311
19. The greenhouse gas balance of a drained fen peatland is mainly controlled by land-use rather than soil organic carbon content T. Eickenscheidt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5161-2015
20. Influence of Soil Organic Carbon on Greenhouse Gas Emission Potential After Application of Biogas Residues or Cattle Slurry: Results from a Pot Experiment G. HEINTZE et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60388-6
21. Fertilisation of permanent grasslands with digestate and its effect on soil properties and sustainable biomass production J. Holatko et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126914
22. From waste to resource: biogas and digestate valorization strategies for sustainable energy and agriculture I. Adnane et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108006
23. Emissions of carbon dioxide and methane from fields fertilized with digestate from an agricultural biogas plant R. Czubaszek & A. Wysocka-Czubaszek https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2016-0087
24. Maize carbon dynamics are driven by soil erosion state and plant phenology rather than nitrogen fertilization form M. Hoffmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.09.004
25. Legacy effects override soil properties for CO2 and N2O but not CH4 emissions following digestate application to soil M. Rosace et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12688
26. No-Till and Solid Digestate Amendment Selectively Affect the Potential Denitrification Activity in Two Mediterranean Orchard Soils M. Monti et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems5020031
27. Continuous Biogas Slurry Substitution of Chemical Fertilizer with Wheat/Maize Straw Return Alters Surface and Subsoil Physicochemical and Aggregate Properties Differently F. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229324600258
28. Effects of Biogas Slurry Application on Vegetation Community Restoration in Degraded Grassland Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052605
29. Ammonia emissions after trailing hose application of digestates and cattle slurry N. Efosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-025-10407-7
30. Use of solid anaerobic digestate and no-tillage practice for restoring the fertility status of two Mediterranean orchard soils with contrasting properties G. Badagliacca et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107010
31. Environmental impact of biogas: A short review of current knowledge V. Paolini et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2018.1459076
32. New opportunities for the European Biogas industry: A review on current installation development, production potentials and yield improvements for manure and agricultural waste mixtures C. Bumharter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135867
33. Detecting small-scale spatial heterogeneity and temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks: a comparison between automatic chamber-derived C budgets and repeated soil inventories M. Hoffmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1003-2017
34. Use of digestate as an alternative to mineral fertilizer: effects on growth and crop quality M. Panuccio et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1520980
35. Mitigation of GHG Emissions from Soils Fertilized with Livestock Chain Residues A. Lagomarsino et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12071593
36. Unveiling on-farm anaerobic digestion systems diversity: A typology analysis of Northern French farms S. Amsaguine et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2026.101486
37. Biogas slurry topdressing as replacement of chemical fertilizers boosts water and nitrogen use efficiency and yield in semiarid rainfed field crops H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109725
38. High emissions of greenhouse gases from grasslands on peat and other organic soils B. Tiemeyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13303
39. Impacts on Soil Health of Soil Improvers Derived from Agri-Food Processing Residues: a Systematic Review with a Focus on European Field Studies M. Caldara et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-026-03037-7
40. Digestate Application on Grassland: Effects of Application Method and Rate on GHG Emissions and Forage Performance P. Šařec et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051243
41. Repeated Solid Digestate Amendment Increases Denitrifying Enzyme Activity in an Acid Clayey Soil G. Badagliacca et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8010014
42. Interannual Effect of Digestate Fertilization on Yields and Quality of Winter Rye Forage J. Pazdera et al. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun.2023.009