83 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Impact of peat depth on soil conditions, plant growth, and greenhouse gas emissions on a boreal agricultural drained peatland M. Niiranen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2026.110400
2. Validation and field application of a low-cost device to measure CO2 and evapotranspiration (ET) fluxes R. Macagga et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1317-2024
3. A new chamber design for measuring nitrous oxide emissions in maize crops H. Olfs et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201700008
4. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice grown on organic soils in the temperate zone C. Wüst-Galley et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108641
5. Can mineral soil coverage be a suitable option to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from agriculturally managed peatlands? S. Paul et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109197
6. Nitrous oxide emission budgets and land-use-driven hotspots for organic soils in Europe T. Leppelt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6595-2014
7. Net N2O and CH4 soil fluxes of annual and perennial bioenergy crops in two central German regions K. Walter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.08.011
8. Profitability of Management Systems on German Fenlands M. Rebhann et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111103
9. Zn isotope fractionation during the development of low-humic gleysols from the Mun River Basin, northeast Thailand B. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105565
10. Effect of agricultural management system (“cash crop”, “livestock” and “climate optimized”) on nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions R. Well et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-024-01843-8
11. Soil drainage facilitates earthworm invasion and subsequent carbon loss from peatland soil X. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12894
12. Peatland use and peat soil land cover types in Ireland: Implications for the calculation of GHG emissions in the context of climate action L. Gilet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107792
13. The effects of peat thickness and water table depth on CO2 and N2O emissions from agricultural peatlands – a process-based modelling approach H. Kajasilta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-3567-2026
14. High soil solution carbon and nitrogen concentrations in a drained Atlantic bog are reduced to natural levels by 10 years of rewetting S. Frank et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2309-2014
15. Effects of water management and grassland renewal on the greenhouse gas emissions from intensively used grassland on bog peat B. Tiemeyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109858
16. Variations in CO2 exchange for dairy farms with year-round rotational grazing on drained peatlands D. Campbell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.12.019
17. CO2 fluxes and ecosystem dynamics at five European treeless peatlands – merging data and process oriented modeling C. Metzger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-125-2015
18. Large-scale regionalization of water table depth in peatlands optimized for greenhouse gas emission upscaling M. Bechtold et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3319-2014
19. Hot regions of labile and stable soil organic carbon in Germany – Spatial variability and driving factors C. Vos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-153-2018
20. An adaptive mapping framework for the management of peat soils: A new Irish peat soils map L. Gilet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116933
21. Practical guidelines for reproducible N2O flux chamber measurements in nutrient-poor ecosystems N. Triches et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3407-2025
22. Effect of past peat cultivation practices on present dynamics of dissolved organic carbon S. Frank et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.121
23. Review of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rewetted Agricultural Soils A. Bianchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-021-01507-5
24. Greenhouse Gas Balance of Sphagnum Farming on Highly Decomposed Peat at Former Peat Extraction Sites J. Oestmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00659-z
25. High greenhouse gas emissions after grassland renewal on bog peat soil L. Offermanns et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109309
26. Technical note: A low-cost, automatic soil–plant–atmosphere enclosure system to investigate CO2 and evapotranspiration flux dynamics W. Al Hamwi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5639-2024
27. High emissions of greenhouse gases from grasslands on peat and other organic soils B. Tiemeyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13303
28. Water level, vegetation composition, and plant productivity explain greenhouse gas fluxes in temperate cutover fens after inundation M. Minke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3945-2016
29. Climate Change Mitigation through Land Use on Rewetted Peatlands – Cross-Sectoral Spatial Planning for Paludiculture in Northeast Germany F. Tanneberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01310-8
30. Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Optimizing Groundwater Level in Boreal Cultivated Peatland J. Heikkinen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01833-4
31. Effect of biochar and liming on soil nitrous oxide emissions from a temperate maize cropping system R. Hüppi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-707-2015
32. Impact of CULTAN fertilization with ammonium sulfate on field emissions of nitrous oxide M. Deppe et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.12.015
33. Restricting the nonlinearity parameter in soil greenhouse gas flux calculation for more reliable flux estimates R. Hüppi et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200876
34. Post-Harvest N2O Emissions Can Be Mitigated With Organic Amendments S. Rothardt et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.712013
35. Dynamic C and N stocks – key factors controlling the C gas exchange of maize in heterogenous peatland M. Pohl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2737-2015
36. Greenhouse gas emissions from fen soils used for forage production in northern Germany A. Poyda et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5221-2016
37. Sheep excreta cause no positive priming of peat-derived CO2 and N2O emissions K. Leiber-Sauheitl et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.001
38. Wetter, but not wet enough—Limited greenhouse gas mitigation effects of subsurface irrigation and blocked ditches in an intensively cultivated grassland on fen peat S. Heller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110367
39. Emissions of nitrous oxide and ammonia after cauliflower harvest are influenced by soil type and crop residue management L. Nett et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9801-2
40. Water management effect on soil oxidation, greenhouse gas emissions, and nitrogen leaching in drained peat soils A. Rodriguez et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20247
41. Comparing chamber and eddy covariance based net ecosystem CO2 exchange of fen soils A. Poyda et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201600447
42. Influence of Soil Organic Carbon on Greenhouse Gas Emission Potential After Application of Biogas Residues or Cattle Slurry: Results from a Pot Experiment G. HEINTZE et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60388-6
43. Mapping peat layer properties with multi-coil offset electromagnetic induction and laser scanning elevation data D. Altdorff et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.07.015
44. Detecting small-scale spatial heterogeneity and temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks: a comparison between automatic chamber-derived C budgets and repeated soil inventories M. Hoffmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1003-2017
45. Interactive effects of vegetation and water table depth on belowground C and N mobilization and greenhouse gas emissions in a restored peatland C. Lazcano et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04434-2
46. Assessment of urban CO2 budget: Anthropogenic and biogenic inputs Y. Bezyk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100949
47. The greenhouse gas balance of a drained fen peatland is mainly controlled by land-use rather than soil organic carbon content T. Eickenscheidt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5161-2015
48. Organic Matter Composition of Digestates Has a Stronger Influence on N2O Emissions than the Supply of Ammoniacal Nitrogen I. Petrova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112215
49. The impacts of drainage, nutrient status and management practice on the full carbon balance of grasslands on organic soils in a maritime temperate zone F. Renou-Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4361-2014
50. Measurements versus Estimates of Soil Subsidence and Mineralization Rates at Peatland over 50 Years (1966–2016) R. Oleszczuk et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416459
51. Non-steady-state closed dynamic chamber to measure soil CO2 respiration: A protocol to reduce uncertainty I. Baneschi et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1048948
52. Divergent NEE balances from manual‐chamber CO2 fluxes linked to different measurement and gap‐filling strategies: A source for uncertainty of estimated terrestrial C sources and sinks? V. Huth et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201600493
53. Net ecosystem fluxes and composition of biogenic volatile organic compounds over a maize field–interaction of meteorology and phenological stages F. Wiß et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12454
54. Pore water velocity and ionic strength effects on DOC release from peat-sand mixtures: Results from laboratory and field experiments B. Tiemeyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.02.024
55. A new methodology for organic soils in national greenhouse gas inventories: Data synthesis, derivation and application B. Tiemeyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105838
56. Effect of chemical and mechanical grassland conversion to cropland on soil mineral N dynamics and N2O emission M. Helfrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106975
57. Minor effects of no-till treatment on GHG emissions of boreal cultivated peat soil H. Honkanen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01097-w
58. Gas chromatography vs. quantum cascade laser-based N2O flux measurements using a novel chamber design C. Brümmer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1365-2017
59. Substrate quality of drained organic soils—Implications for carbon dioxide fluxes A. Säurich et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202000475
60. Soil organic matter stoichiometry as indicator for peatland degradation J. Leifeld et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64275-y
61. Previously Unrecognized Land‐Use Control on Deep Soil CO2 Sink K. Tetteh et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.71119
62. From Drainage to Rewetting—Soil Transformations in European Agricultural Peatlands: A Review M. Joel & B. Glina https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16050586
63. Annual CO2 Budget Estimation From Chamber-Based Flux Measurements on Intensively Drained Peat Meadows: Effect of Gap-Filling Strategies W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.803746
64. InSAR shows extensive subsidence of agricultural land in New Zealand M. Harvey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2025.100525
65. Full greenhouse gas balance of silage maize cultivation following grassland: Are no-tillage practices favourable under highly productive soil conditions? I. Struck et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104615
66. Impact of Soil Organic Layer Thickness on Soil-to-Atmosphere GHG Fluxes in Grassland in Latvia D. Purviņa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030387
67. Adaptation of fen peatlands to climate change: rewetting and management shift can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and offset climate warming effects C. Bockermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01113-z
68. Near‐neutral carbon dioxide balance at a seminatural, temperate bog ecosystem M. Hurkuck et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003195
69. Identifying artificially drained pasture soils using machine learning and Earth observation imagery R. O’Hara et al. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.14.034508
70. A Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emission Patterns in Different Water Levels in Peatlands C. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16070985
71. How do sand addition, soil moisture and nutrient status influence greenhouse gas fluxes from drained organic soils? A. Säurich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.04.013
72. How to Improve Cumulative Methane and Nitrous Oxide Flux Estimations of the Non‐Steady‐State Chamber Method? H. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006641
73. Soil mineral N dynamics and N2O emissions following grassland renewal C. Buchen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.013
74. Annual net CO2 fluxes from drained organic soils used for agriculture in the hemiboreal region of Europe A. Bārdule et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4241-2025
75. Combining a root exclusion technique with continuous chamber and porous tube measurements for a pin‐point separation of ecosystem respiration in croplands M. Hoffmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201600489
76. Analysing uncertainties in the calculation of fluxes using whole-plant chambers: random and systematic errors O. Pérez-Priego et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2481-x
77. N use efficiencies and N 2 O emissions in two contrasting, biochar amended soils under winter wheat—cover crop—sorghum rotation R. Hüppi et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/084013
78. Land use-driven historical soil carbon losses in Swiss peatlands C. Wüst-Galley et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00941-5
79. Efficacy of agronomic strategies for mitigation of after-harvest N 2 O emissions of winter oilseed rape B. Vinzent et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.06.009
80. Drained organic soils under agriculture — The more degraded the soil the higher the specific basal respiration A. Säurich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113911
81. N2O emissions and nitrogen dynamics of winter rapeseed fertilized with different N forms and a nitrification inhibitor B. Vinzent et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.028
82. The Variability in the Thermophysical Properties of Soils for Sustainability of the Industrial-Affected Zone of the Siberian Arctic T. Ponomareva et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198892
83. Underestimation of carbon dioxide emissions from organic-rich agricultural soils Z. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01459-8