Articles | Volume 13, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3359-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3359-2016
Reviews and syntheses
 | 
09 Jun 2016
Reviews and syntheses |  | 09 Jun 2016

The status and challenge of global fire modelling

Stijn Hantson, Almut Arneth, Sandy P. Harrison, Douglas I. Kelley, I. Colin Prentice, Sam S. Rabin, Sally Archibald, Florent Mouillot, Steve R. Arnold, Paulo Artaxo, Dominique Bachelet, Philippe Ciais, Matthew Forrest, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thomas Hickler, Jed O. Kaplan, Silvia Kloster, Wolfgang Knorr, Gitta Lasslop, Fang Li, Stephane Mangeon, Joe R. Melton, Andrea Meyn, Stephen Sitch, Allan Spessa, Guido R. van der Werf, Apostolos Voulgarakis, and Chao Yue

Viewed

Total article views: 10,899 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
6,027 4,256 616 10,899 195 220
  • HTML: 6,027
  • PDF: 4,256
  • XML: 616
  • Total: 10,899
  • BibTeX: 195
  • EndNote: 220
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jan 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jan 2016)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Discussed (final revised paper)

Discussed (final revised paper)

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Our ability to predict the magnitude and geographic pattern of past and future fire impacts rests on our ability to model fire regimes. A large variety of models exist, and it is unclear which type of model or degree of complexity is required to model fire adequately at regional to global scales. In this paper we summarize the current state of the art in fire-regime modelling and model evaluation, and outline what lessons may be learned from the Fire Model Intercomparison Project – FireMIP.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint