Authors have responded satisfactorily to the comments made by the two Reviewers. Based on the response, Authors are advised to incorporate all these changes and to submit revised version of the manuscript for further consideration.

There is still lack of clarity in the revised abstract of the manuscript submitted by Authors. As pointed out under specific comments, some of the sentences and words are rather confusing. A corrected version of the abstract is attached here. Authors may like to consider the changes as appropriate and agreeable to improve the clarity.
Specific comments:
1) First two sentences of the abstract are redundant and should be deleted.
2) Abstract, 3rd line: What authors mean by the phrase “on the quality of dissolved -------. Are they referring to composition of dissolved and particulate OC and ON?
3) Abstract, 6th line: “------ concentrations were stable”. This is not a right phrase to use. See the corrected abstract for better clarity.
4) Abstract, 9th line: Is it stream benches or “branches”. Please check!
5) Abstract, 10th and 13th line: What is cumulative fluxes? Are these integrated over the study period of two months? Pl clarify!
6) Abstract, 14th line: What authors mean by the phrase “Quality parameters of organic matter in soils and runoff --------“. Are they referring to composition of organic matter? See corrected abstract for clarity.
7) Manuscript title should be changed to “Variability in runoff fluxes of dissolved------------------- during intense storm events”.