Articles | Volume 14, issue 8
Research article
24 Apr 2017
Research article |  | 24 Apr 2017

The nitrogen, carbon and greenhouse gas budget of a grazed, cut and fertilised temperate grassland

Stephanie K. Jones, Carole Helfter, Margaret Anderson, Mhairi Coyle, Claire Campbell, Daniela Famulari, Chiara Di Marco, Netty van Dijk, Y. Sim Tang, Cairistiona F. E. Topp, Ralf Kiese, Reimo Kindler, Jan Siemens, Marion Schrumpf, Klaus Kaiser, Eiko Nemitz, Peter E. Levy, Robert M. Rees, Mark A. Sutton, and Ute M. Skiba


Total article views: 4,108 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,377 1,528 203 4,108 264 81 117
  • HTML: 2,377
  • PDF: 1,528
  • XML: 203
  • Total: 4,108
  • Supplement: 264
  • BibTeX: 81
  • EndNote: 117
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jun 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jun 2016)


Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 28 May 2023
Short summary
We assessed the nitrogen (N), carbon (C) and greenhouse gas (GHG) budget from an intensively managed grassland in southern Scotland using flux budget calculations as well as changes in soil N and C pools over time. Estimates from flux budget calculations indicated that N and C were sequestered, whereas soil stock measurements indicated a smaller N storage and a loss of C from the ecosystem. The GHG sink strength of the net CO2 ecosystem exchange was strongly affected by CH4 and N2O emissions.
Final-revised paper