Research article 03 Nov 2017
Research article | 03 Nov 2017
Global consequences of afforestation and bioenergy cultivation on ecosystem service indicators
Andreas Krause et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 5,052 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 May 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4,013 | 945 | 94 | 5,052 | 178 | 85 | 120 |
- HTML: 4,013
- PDF: 945
- XML: 94
- Total: 5,052
- Supplement: 178
- BibTeX: 85
- EndNote: 120
Total article views: 4,509 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Nov 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,665 | 767 | 77 | 4,509 | 178 | 81 | 100 |
- HTML: 3,665
- PDF: 767
- XML: 77
- Total: 4,509
- Supplement: 178
- BibTeX: 81
- EndNote: 100
Total article views: 543 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 May 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
348 | 178 | 17 | 543 | 4 | 20 |
- HTML: 348
- PDF: 178
- XML: 17
- Total: 543
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,302 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,285 with geography defined
and 17 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,763 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,749 with geography defined
and 14 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 539 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 536 with geography defined
and 3 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
20 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land-based climate-change mitigation efforts A. Krause et al. 10.1111/gcb.14144
- Carbon Sequestration Potential from Large-Scale Reforestation and Sugarcane Expansion on Abandoned Agricultural Lands in Brazil I. Kerdan et al. 10.1007/s41050-019-00012-3
- Multimodel Analysis of Future Land Use and Climate Change Impacts on Ecosystem Functioning A. Krause et al. 10.1029/2018EF001123
- From political to climate crisis O. Cavalett 10.1038/s41558-018-0228-4
- Climate impacts of retention forestry in a Swedish boreal pine forest F. Cherubini et al. 10.1080/1747423X.2018.1529831
- Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade‐offs J. Doelman et al. 10.1111/gcb.14887
- Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets A. Harper et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-05340-z
- Modeling forest plantations for carbon uptake with the LPJmL dynamic global vegetation model M. Braakhekke et al. 10.5194/esd-10-617-2019
- A regional assessment of land‐based carbon mitigation potentials: Bioenergy, BECCS, reforestation, and forest management A. Krause et al. 10.1111/gcbb.12675
- Which practices co‐deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification? P. Smith et al. 10.1111/gcb.14878
- Achievement of Paris climate goals unlikely due to time lags in the land system C. Brown et al. 10.1038/s41558-019-0400-5
- Future projections of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe with two integrated assessment models C. Veerkamp et al. 10.1007/s10113-020-01685-8
- Effects of Soil Organic construction on Regional Surface ET and GPP of Coal mine goaf L. Gang et al. 10.1088/1742-6596/1549/2/022091
- Climate extremes, land–climate feedbacks and land-use forcing at 1.5°C S. Seneviratne et al. 10.1098/rsta.2016.0450
- Differences between low-end and high-end climate change impacts in Europe across multiple sectors P. Harrison et al. 10.1007/s10113-018-1352-4
- A novel energy systems model to explore the role of land use and reforestation in achieving carbon mitigation targets: A Brazil case study I. García Kerdan et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.345
- Diverging land-use projections cause large variability in their impacts on ecosystems and related indicators for ecosystem services A. Bayer et al. 10.5194/esd-12-327-2021
- Impacts of future agricultural change on ecosystem service indicators S. Rabin et al. 10.5194/esd-11-357-2020
- Land management and climate change determine second‐generation bioenergy potential of the US Northern Great Plains K. Dolan et al. 10.1111/gcbb.12686
- Rangeland Livelihood Strategies under Varying Climate Regimes: Model Insights from Southern Kenya R. Kariuki et al. 10.3390/land7020047
20 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land-based climate-change mitigation efforts A. Krause et al. 10.1111/gcb.14144
- Carbon Sequestration Potential from Large-Scale Reforestation and Sugarcane Expansion on Abandoned Agricultural Lands in Brazil I. Kerdan et al. 10.1007/s41050-019-00012-3
- Multimodel Analysis of Future Land Use and Climate Change Impacts on Ecosystem Functioning A. Krause et al. 10.1029/2018EF001123
- From political to climate crisis O. Cavalett 10.1038/s41558-018-0228-4
- Climate impacts of retention forestry in a Swedish boreal pine forest F. Cherubini et al. 10.1080/1747423X.2018.1529831
- Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade‐offs J. Doelman et al. 10.1111/gcb.14887
- Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets A. Harper et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-05340-z
- Modeling forest plantations for carbon uptake with the LPJmL dynamic global vegetation model M. Braakhekke et al. 10.5194/esd-10-617-2019
- A regional assessment of land‐based carbon mitigation potentials: Bioenergy, BECCS, reforestation, and forest management A. Krause et al. 10.1111/gcbb.12675
- Which practices co‐deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification? P. Smith et al. 10.1111/gcb.14878
- Achievement of Paris climate goals unlikely due to time lags in the land system C. Brown et al. 10.1038/s41558-019-0400-5
- Future projections of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe with two integrated assessment models C. Veerkamp et al. 10.1007/s10113-020-01685-8
- Effects of Soil Organic construction on Regional Surface ET and GPP of Coal mine goaf L. Gang et al. 10.1088/1742-6596/1549/2/022091
- Climate extremes, land–climate feedbacks and land-use forcing at 1.5°C S. Seneviratne et al. 10.1098/rsta.2016.0450
- Differences between low-end and high-end climate change impacts in Europe across multiple sectors P. Harrison et al. 10.1007/s10113-018-1352-4
- A novel energy systems model to explore the role of land use and reforestation in achieving carbon mitigation targets: A Brazil case study I. García Kerdan et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.345
- Diverging land-use projections cause large variability in their impacts on ecosystems and related indicators for ecosystem services A. Bayer et al. 10.5194/esd-12-327-2021
- Impacts of future agricultural change on ecosystem service indicators S. Rabin et al. 10.5194/esd-11-357-2020
- Land management and climate change determine second‐generation bioenergy potential of the US Northern Great Plains K. Dolan et al. 10.1111/gcbb.12686
- Rangeland Livelihood Strategies under Varying Climate Regimes: Model Insights from Southern Kenya R. Kariuki et al. 10.3390/land7020047
Latest update: 21 Apr 2021
Short summary
Many climate change mitigation scenarios require negative emissions from land management. However, environmental side effects are often not considered. Here, we use projections of future land use from two land-use models as input to a vegetation model. We show that carbon removal via bioenergy production or forest maintenance and expansion affect a range of ecosystem functions. Largest impacts are found for crop production, nitrogen losses, and emissions of biogenic volatile organic compounds.
Many climate change mitigation scenarios require negative emissions from land management....
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint