Articles | Volume 15, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018
Reviews and syntheses
 | 
09 Nov 2018
Reviews and syntheses |  | 09 Nov 2018

Reviews and syntheses: the GESAMP atmospheric iron deposition model intercomparison study

Stelios Myriokefalitakis, Akinori Ito, Maria Kanakidou, Athanasios Nenes, Maarten C. Krol, Natalie M. Mahowald, Rachel A. Scanza, Douglas S. Hamilton, Matthew S. Johnson, Nicholas Meskhidze, Jasper F. Kok, Cecile Guieu, Alex R. Baker, Timothy D. Jickells, Manmohan M. Sarin, Srinivas Bikkina, Rachel Shelley, Andrew Bowie, Morgane M. G. Perron, and Robert A. Duce

Viewed

Total article views: 4,490 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,974 1,433 83 4,490 450 73 108
  • HTML: 2,974
  • PDF: 1,433
  • XML: 83
  • Total: 4,490
  • Supplement: 450
  • BibTeX: 73
  • EndNote: 108
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jul 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jul 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,490 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,228 with geography defined and 262 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
The first atmospheric iron (Fe) deposition model intercomparison is presented in this study, as a result of the deliberations of the United Nations Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP; http://www.gesamp.org/) Working Group 38. We conclude that model diversity over remote oceans reflects uncertainty in the Fe content parameterizations of dust aerosols, combustion aerosol emissions and the size distribution of transported aerosol Fe.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint