Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-937-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-937-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
Technical note
 | 
15 Feb 2018
Technical note |  | 15 Feb 2018

Technical note: Comparison of methane ebullition modelling approaches used in terrestrial wetland models

Olli Peltola, Maarit Raivonen, Xuefei Li, and Timo Vesala

Viewed

Total article views: 3,286 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,969 1,216 101 3,286 279 118 152
  • HTML: 1,969
  • PDF: 1,216
  • XML: 101
  • Total: 3,286
  • Supplement: 279
  • BibTeX: 118
  • EndNote: 152
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jul 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jul 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,286 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,176 with geography defined and 110 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 01 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Emission via bubbling, i.e. ebullition, is one of the main CH4 emission pathways from wetlands to the atmosphere, yet it is still coarsely represented in wetland CH4 models. In this study three ebullition modelling approaches are evaluated. Modeled annual CH4 emissions were similar, whereas temporal variability in CH4 emissions varied an order of magnitude between the approaches. Hence realistic description of ebullition is needed when models are compared to and calibrated against measurements.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint