Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-937-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-937-2018
Technical note
 | 
15 Feb 2018
Technical note |  | 15 Feb 2018

Technical note: Comparison of methane ebullition modelling approaches used in terrestrial wetland models

Olli Peltola, Maarit Raivonen, Xuefei Li, and Timo Vesala

Viewed

Total article views: 2,732 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,649 996 87 2,732 267 83 103
  • HTML: 1,649
  • PDF: 996
  • XML: 87
  • Total: 2,732
  • Supplement: 267
  • BibTeX: 83
  • EndNote: 103
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jul 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jul 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,732 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,621 with geography defined and 111 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Emission via bubbling, i.e. ebullition, is one of the main CH4 emission pathways from wetlands to the atmosphere, yet it is still coarsely represented in wetland CH4 models. In this study three ebullition modelling approaches are evaluated. Modeled annual CH4 emissions were similar, whereas temporal variability in CH4 emissions varied an order of magnitude between the approaches. Hence realistic description of ebullition is needed when models are compared to and calibrated against measurements.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint