Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1829-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1829-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
Research article
 | 
30 Apr 2019
Research article |  | 30 Apr 2019

How representative are FLUXNET measurements of surface fluxes during temperature extremes?

Sophie V. J. van der Horst, Andrew J. Pitman, Martin G. De Kauwe, Anna Ukkola, Gab Abramowitz, and Peter Isaac

Viewed

Total article views: 3,941 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,762 1,086 93 3,941 1,074 105 143
  • HTML: 2,762
  • PDF: 1,086
  • XML: 93
  • Total: 3,941
  • Supplement: 1,074
  • BibTeX: 105
  • EndNote: 143
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,941 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,282 with geography defined and 659 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 06 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
Measurements of surface fluxes are taken around the world and are extremely valuable for understanding how the land and atmopshere interact, and how the land can amplify temerature extremes. However, do these measurements sample extreme temperatures, or are they biased to the average? We examine this question and highlight data that do measure surface fluxes under extreme conditions. This provides a way forward to help model developers improve their models.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint