Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 16, issue 9
Articles | Volume 16, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1865-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1865-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 9
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
06 May 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 06 May 2019

Reciprocal bias compensation and ensuing uncertainties in model-based climate projections: pelagic biogeochemistry versus ocean mixing

Ulrike Löptien and Heiner Dietze

Viewed

Total article views: 6,669 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
5,591 951 127 6,669 105 133
  • HTML: 5,591
  • PDF: 951
  • XML: 127
  • Total: 6,669
  • BibTeX: 105
  • EndNote: 133
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Dec 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Dec 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,669 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,800 with geography defined and 869 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions trigger complex climate feedbacks. Output form Earth system models provides a basis for related political decision-making. One challenge is to arrive at reliable model parameter estimates for the ocean biogeochemistry module. We illustrate pitfalls through which flaws in the ocean module are masked by wrongly tuning the biogeochemistry and discuss ensuing uncertainties in climate projections.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint