Articles | Volume 16, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1865-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1865-2019
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
06 May 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 06 May 2019

Reciprocal bias compensation and ensuing uncertainties in model-based climate projections: pelagic biogeochemistry versus ocean mixing

Ulrike Löptien and Heiner Dietze

Viewed

Total article views: 5,993 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
5,107 789 97 5,993 83 85
  • HTML: 5,107
  • PDF: 789
  • XML: 97
  • Total: 5,993
  • BibTeX: 83
  • EndNote: 85
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Dec 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Dec 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,993 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,132 with geography defined and 861 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 25 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions trigger complex climate feedbacks. Output form Earth system models provides a basis for related political decision-making. One challenge is to arrive at reliable model parameter estimates for the ocean biogeochemistry module. We illustrate pitfalls through which flaws in the ocean module are masked by wrongly tuning the biogeochemistry and discuss ensuing uncertainties in climate projections.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint