Articles | Volume 16, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3491-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3491-2019
Research article
 | 
17 Sep 2019
Research article |  | 17 Sep 2019

Assessing the peatland hummock–hollow classification framework using high-resolution elevation models: implications for appropriate complexity ecosystem modeling

Paul A. Moore, Maxwell C. Lukenbach, Dan K. Thompson, Nick Kettridge, Gustaf Granath, and James M. Waddington

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (18 Jun 2019) by Andreas Ibrom
AR by Paul Moore on behalf of the Authors (19 Jul 2019)
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (24 Jul 2019) by Andreas Ibrom
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (29 Jul 2019)
ED: Publish as is (06 Aug 2019) by Andreas Ibrom
AR by Paul Moore on behalf of the Authors (12 Aug 2019)
Download
Short summary
Using very-high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs), we assessed the basic structure and microtopographic variability of hummock–hollow plots at boreal and hemi-boreal sites primarily in North America. Using a simple model of peatland biogeochemical function, our results suggest that both surface heating and moss productivity may not be adequately resolved in models which only consider idealized hummock–hollow units.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint