Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-831-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-831-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
14 Feb 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 14 Feb 2019

Towards a more complete quantification of the global carbon cycle

Miko U. F. Kirschbaum, Guang Zeng, Fabiano Ximenes, Donna L. Giltrap, and John R. Zeldis

Viewed

Total article views: 9,683 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
7,395 2,122 166 9,683 385 155 170
  • HTML: 7,395
  • PDF: 2,122
  • XML: 166
  • Total: 9,683
  • Supplement: 385
  • BibTeX: 155
  • EndNote: 170
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 9,683 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 8,452 with geography defined and 1,231 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Globally, C is added to the atmosphere from fossil fuels and deforestation, balanced by ocean uptake and atmospheric increase. The difference (residual sink) is equated to plant uptake. But this omits cement carbonation; transport to oceans by dust; riverine organic C and volatile organics; and increased C in plastic, bitumen, wood, landfills, and lakes. Their inclusion reduces the residual sink from 3.6 to 2.1 GtC yr-1 and thus the inferred ability of the biosphere to alter human C emissions.
Read more
Share
Special issue
The 10th International Carbon Dioxide Conference (ICDC10)...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint