Articles | Volume 17, issue 16
Biogeosciences, 17, 4173–4222, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020
Biogeosciences, 17, 4173–4222, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020

Research article 18 Aug 2020

Research article | 18 Aug 2020

Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models

Vivek K. Arora et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (10 Mar 2020) by Alexey V. Eliseev
AR by Vivek Arora on behalf of the Authors (04 May 2020)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (08 May 2020) by Alexey V. Eliseev
ED: Publish as is (18 May 2020) by Alexey V. Eliseev

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval
AA by Vivek Arora on behalf of the Authors (14 Aug 2020)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (16 Aug 2020) by Alexey V. Eliseev
Download
Short summary
Since the preindustrial period, land and ocean have taken up about half of the carbon emitted into the atmosphere by humans. Comparison of different earth system models with the carbon cycle allows us to assess how carbon uptake by land and ocean differs among models. This yields an estimate of uncertainty in our understanding of how land and ocean respond to increasing atmospheric CO2. This paper summarizes results from two such model intercomparison projects that use an idealized scenario.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint