Articles | Volume 17, issue 22
Biogeosciences, 17, 5721–5743, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5721-2020
Biogeosciences, 17, 5721–5743, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5721-2020

Research article 23 Nov 2020

Research article | 23 Nov 2020

Evaluating two soil carbon models within the global land surface model JSBACH using surface and spaceborne observations of atmospheric CO2

Tea Thum et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,538 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,178 338 22 1,538 113 20 23
  • HTML: 1,178
  • PDF: 338
  • XML: 22
  • Total: 1,538
  • Supplement: 113
  • BibTeX: 20
  • EndNote: 23
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,098 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,090 with geography defined and 8 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
Global vegetation models are important tools in estimating the impacts of global climate change. The fate of soil carbon is of the upmost importance as its emissions will enhance the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. To evaluate the skill of global vegetation models to model the soil carbon and its responses to environmental factors, it is important to use different data sources. We evaluated two different soil carbon models by using atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint