Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3823-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3823-2021
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
29 Jun 2021
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 29 Jun 2021

Evaluation of ocean dimethylsulfide concentration and emission in CMIP6 models

Josué Bock, Martine Michou, Pierre Nabat, Manabu Abe, Jane P. Mulcahy, Dirk J. L. Olivié, Jörg Schwinger, Parvadha Suntharalingam, Jerry Tjiputra, Marco van Hulten, Michio Watanabe, Andrew Yool, and Roland Séférian

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on bg-2020-463', Martí Galí, 29 Jan 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on bg-2020-463', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Feb 2021
  • RC3: 'Comment on bg-2020-463', Nadja Steiner, 25 Feb 2021

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (20 Apr 2021) by Alexey V. Eliseev
AR by Josué Bock on behalf of the Authors (21 Apr 2021)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (27 Apr 2021) by Alexey V. Eliseev
AR by Josué Bock on behalf of the Authors (30 Apr 2021)
Download
Short summary
In this study we analyse surface ocean dimethylsulfide (DMS) concentration and flux to the atmosphere from four CMIP6 Earth system models over the historical and ssp585 simulations. Our analysis of contemporary (1980–2009) climatologies shows that models better reproduce observations in mid to high latitudes. The models disagree on the sign of the trend of the global DMS flux from 1980 onwards. The models agree on a positive trend of DMS over polar latitudes following sea-ice retreat dynamics.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint