Articles | Volume 18, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
22 Dec 2021
Research article |
| 22 Dec 2021
| 22 Dec 2021
Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4)
Linda M. J. Kooijmans
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Ara Cho
Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht University, Utrecht,
the Netherlands
Aleya Kaushik
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences,
University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Katherine D. Haynes
Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Ian Baker
Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Ingrid T. Luijkx
Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Mathijs Groenink
Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Wouter Peters
Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Centre for Isotope Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
John B. Miller
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Joseph A. Berry
Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science,
Stanford, CA, USA
Jerome Ogée
INRAE, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, UMR 1391 ISPA, 33140 Villenave-d'Ornon, France
Laura K. Meredith
School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of
Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science,
Stanford, CA, USA
Kukka-Maaria Kohonen
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics,
Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Timo Vesala
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics,
Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Forest
Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Yugra State University, 628012, Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia
Ivan Mammarella
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics,
Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Huilin Chen
Centre for Isotope Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Felix M. Spielmann
Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Georg Wohlfahrt
Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Max Berkelhammer
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of
Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Mary E. Whelan
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New
Brunswick, NJ, USA
Kadmiel Maseyk
School of Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, The Open
University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK
Ulli Seibt
Department of Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Roisin Commane
Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Lamont–Doherty
Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA
Richard Wehr
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of
Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
currently at: Center for Atmospheric and Environmental
Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA
Maarten Krol
Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht University, Utrecht,
the Netherlands
Viewed
Total article views: 2,866 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 26 Jul 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,041 | 776 | 49 | 2,866 | 208 | 44 | 43 |
- HTML: 2,041
- PDF: 776
- XML: 49
- Total: 2,866
- Supplement: 208
- BibTeX: 44
- EndNote: 43
Total article views: 1,873 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 22 Dec 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,355 | 488 | 30 | 1,873 | 127 | 37 | 35 |
- HTML: 1,355
- PDF: 488
- XML: 30
- Total: 1,873
- Supplement: 127
- BibTeX: 37
- EndNote: 35
Total article views: 993 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 26 Jul 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 686 | 288 | 19 | 993 | 81 | 7 | 8 |
- HTML: 686
- PDF: 288
- XML: 19
- Total: 993
- Supplement: 81
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,866 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,738 with geography defined
and 128 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,873 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,793 with geography defined
and 80 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 993 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 945 with geography defined
and 48 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
20 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Remotely Sensed Carbonyl Sulfide Constrains Model Estimates of Amazon Primary Productivity J. Stinecipher et al. 10.1029/2021GL096802
- Quantifying Northern High Latitude Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) Using Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) L. Kuai et al. 10.1029/2021GB007216
- Diurnal variability of atmospheric O2, CO2, and their exchange ratio above a boreal forest in southern Finland K. Faassen et al. 10.5194/acp-23-851-2023
- Long-term fluxes of carbonyl sulfide and their seasonality and interannual variability in a boreal forest T. Vesala et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2569-2022
- Enhanced Photosynthesis and Transpiration in an Old Growth Forest Due To Wildfire Smoke B. Rastogi et al. 10.1029/2022GL097959
- Near-real-time CO2 fluxes from CarbonTracker Europe for high-resolution atmospheric modeling A. van der Woude et al. 10.5194/essd-15-579-2023
- Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide inferred from tower and mobile atmospheric observations in the Netherlands A. Zanchetta et al. 10.5194/bg-20-3539-2023
- Restricted internal diffusion weakens transpiration–photosynthesis coupling during heatwaves: Evidence from leaf carbonyl sulphide exchange W. Sun et al. 10.1111/pce.14840
- Carbon and Water Fluxes of the Boreal Evergreen Needleleaf Forest Biome Constrained by Assimilating Ecosystem Carbonyl Sulfide Flux Observations C. Abadie et al. 10.1029/2023JG007407
- Variations of Carbonyl Sulfide During the Dry/Wet Seasons Over the Amazon X. Wang et al. 10.1029/2022GL101717
- Sea animal colonies enhance carbonyl sulfide emissions from coastal Antarctic tundra W. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00990-4
- Optimizing the carbonic anhydrase temperature response and stomatal conductance of carbonyl sulfide leaf uptake in the Simple Biosphere model (SiB4) A. Cho et al. 10.5194/bg-20-2573-2023
- Constraining the budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide using a 3-D chemical transport model M. Cartwright et al. 10.5194/acp-23-10035-2023
- Simulating canopy carbonyl sulfide uptake of two forest stands through an improved ecosystem model and parameter optimization using an ensemble Kalman filter B. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110212
- Technical note: Novel estimates of the leaf relative uptake rate of carbonyl sulfide from optimality theory G. Wohlfahrt et al. 10.5194/bg-20-589-2023
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- Comment on “An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide” by Quaglia et al. (2022) M. von Hobe et al. 10.5194/acp-23-6591-2023
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS; Part One): Evaluating the Impact of Transport and Emissions on Tropospheric Variability Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Data M. Remaud et al. 10.1029/2022JD037817
- Light and Water Conditions Co-Regulated Stomata and Leaf Relative Uptake Rate (LRU) during Photosynthesis and COS Assimilation: A Meta-Analysis P. Wang et al. 10.3390/su14052840
20 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Remotely Sensed Carbonyl Sulfide Constrains Model Estimates of Amazon Primary Productivity J. Stinecipher et al. 10.1029/2021GL096802
- Quantifying Northern High Latitude Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) Using Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) L. Kuai et al. 10.1029/2021GB007216
- Diurnal variability of atmospheric O2, CO2, and their exchange ratio above a boreal forest in southern Finland K. Faassen et al. 10.5194/acp-23-851-2023
- Long-term fluxes of carbonyl sulfide and their seasonality and interannual variability in a boreal forest T. Vesala et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2569-2022
- Enhanced Photosynthesis and Transpiration in an Old Growth Forest Due To Wildfire Smoke B. Rastogi et al. 10.1029/2022GL097959
- Near-real-time CO2 fluxes from CarbonTracker Europe for high-resolution atmospheric modeling A. van der Woude et al. 10.5194/essd-15-579-2023
- Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide inferred from tower and mobile atmospheric observations in the Netherlands A. Zanchetta et al. 10.5194/bg-20-3539-2023
- Restricted internal diffusion weakens transpiration–photosynthesis coupling during heatwaves: Evidence from leaf carbonyl sulphide exchange W. Sun et al. 10.1111/pce.14840
- Carbon and Water Fluxes of the Boreal Evergreen Needleleaf Forest Biome Constrained by Assimilating Ecosystem Carbonyl Sulfide Flux Observations C. Abadie et al. 10.1029/2023JG007407
- Variations of Carbonyl Sulfide During the Dry/Wet Seasons Over the Amazon X. Wang et al. 10.1029/2022GL101717
- Sea animal colonies enhance carbonyl sulfide emissions from coastal Antarctic tundra W. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00990-4
- Optimizing the carbonic anhydrase temperature response and stomatal conductance of carbonyl sulfide leaf uptake in the Simple Biosphere model (SiB4) A. Cho et al. 10.5194/bg-20-2573-2023
- Constraining the budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide using a 3-D chemical transport model M. Cartwright et al. 10.5194/acp-23-10035-2023
- Simulating canopy carbonyl sulfide uptake of two forest stands through an improved ecosystem model and parameter optimization using an ensemble Kalman filter B. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110212
- Technical note: Novel estimates of the leaf relative uptake rate of carbonyl sulfide from optimality theory G. Wohlfahrt et al. 10.5194/bg-20-589-2023
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- Comment on “An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide” by Quaglia et al. (2022) M. von Hobe et al. 10.5194/acp-23-6591-2023
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS; Part One): Evaluating the Impact of Transport and Emissions on Tropospheric Variability Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Data M. Remaud et al. 10.1029/2022JD037817
- Light and Water Conditions Co-Regulated Stomata and Leaf Relative Uptake Rate (LRU) during Photosynthesis and COS Assimilation: A Meta-Analysis P. Wang et al. 10.3390/su14052840
Latest update: 18 Apr 2024
Short summary
The gas carbonyl sulfide (COS) can be used to estimate photosynthesis. To adopt this approach on regional and global scales, we need biosphere models that can simulate COS exchange. So far, such models have not been evaluated against observations. We evaluate the COS biosphere exchange of the SiB4 model against COS flux observations. We find that the model is capable of simulating key processes in COS biosphere exchange. Still, we give recommendations for further improvement of the model.
The gas carbonyl sulfide (COS) can be used to estimate photosynthesis. To adopt this approach on...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint