Articles | Volume 19, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022
Research article
 | 
16 Dec 2022
Research article |  | 16 Dec 2022

Evaluation of wetland CH4 in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES) land surface model using satellite observations

Robert J. Parker, Chris Wilson, Edward Comyn-Platt, Garry Hayman, Toby R. Marthews, A. Anthony Bloom, Mark F. Lunt, Nicola Gedney, Simon J. Dadson, Joe McNorton, Neil Humpage, Hartmut Boesch, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Paul I. Palmer, and Dai Yamazaki

Viewed

Total article views: 3,680 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,841 766 73 3,680 45 46
  • HTML: 2,841
  • PDF: 766
  • XML: 73
  • Total: 3,680
  • BibTeX: 45
  • EndNote: 46
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jan 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jan 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,680 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,565 with geography defined and 115 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane, one of the most important climate gases. The JULES land surface model simulates these emissions. We use satellite data to evaluate how well JULES reproduces the methane seasonal cycle over different tropical wetlands. It performs well for most regions; however, it struggles for some African wetlands influenced heavily by river flooding. We explain the reasons for these deficiencies and highlight how future development will improve these areas.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint