Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 21, issue 19
Articles | Volume 21, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4439-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4439-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 21, issue 19
Research article
 | 
14 Oct 2024
Research article |  | 14 Oct 2024

Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) climatologies, fluxes, and trends – Part 1: Differences between seawater DMS estimations

Sankirna D. Joge, Anoop S. Mahajan, Shrivardhan Hulswar, Christa A. Marandino, Martí Galí, Thomas G. Bell, and Rafel Simó

Viewed

Total article views: 1,025 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
830 147 48 1,025 60 24 34
  • HTML: 830
  • PDF: 147
  • XML: 48
  • Total: 1,025
  • Supplement: 60
  • BibTeX: 24
  • EndNote: 34
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,025 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,102 with geography defined and -77 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is the largest natural source of sulfur in the atmosphere and leads to the formation of cloud condensation nuclei. DMS emission and quantification of its impacts have large uncertainties, but a detailed study on the emissions and drivers of their uncertainty is missing to date. The emissions are usually calculated from the seawater DMS concentrations and a flux parameterization. Here we quantify the differences in DMS seawater products, which can affect DMS fluxes.
Read more
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint