Articles | Volume 21, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5305-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Microbial response to deliquescence of nitrate-rich soils in the hyperarid Atacama Desert
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 27 Nov 2024)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 22 Jul 2024)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1859', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Aug 2024
- AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Felix Leo Arens, 11 Sep 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1859', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Sep 2024
- AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Felix Leo Arens, 11 Sep 2024
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Felix Leo Arens, 11 Sep 2024
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (18 Sep 2024) by Tina Treude
AR by Felix Leo Arens on behalf of the Authors (18 Sep 2024)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (02 Oct 2024) by Tina Treude
AR by Felix Leo Arens on behalf of the Authors (08 Oct 2024)
Manuscript
This study focusses on deliquescent soil surfaces in the Atacama Desert to evaluate their potential as habitat for microorganisms. While using a range of different proxies they gained important information that hygroscopic salts provide lower microbial abundances and that their activities are lower than in non-deliquescent soil surfaces which leads them to the conclusion that high nitrate concentrations suppress the microbial activity but preserve eolian-derived biomolecules.
Although in the last decades the Atacama was already intensively studied regarding its habitability, nitrate rich soil crusts have been neglected so far. Therefore, this study provides an important value for the current state of the art regarding the habitability of the Atacama Desert and also other extraterrestrial surfaces e.g., on Mars.
I recommend the publication of this study in Biogeosciences following some minor revisions.
In the Introduction, I was missing a passage about the night and day shift which become very important when reading the rest of the paper e.g., the results part of it.
L29: Could you add a sentence to better point out the current research gap (e.g., habitability of salts in the Atacama Desert or what is the significance of nitrates for microbial life in one of the most arid regions on Earth, serving as an outstanding Martian analog?)
L29: Are the words “newly discovered” so important to mention at this point? A potential reader maybe does not know directly that there are already many investigations before. If there are so many could you point them out a bit more clearly in the Introduction part?
L46: can you replace “absolute desert” with “hyperarid core” which you mention later to keep it more consistent?
L57: the one of the last islands….is found or one of the last islands are found. Next sentence also starts with “these” so refers to a plural form.
L59: of salts
L64: write salars also in italic
Figure 1: a) replace “Sanitago” with “Santiago”
L86: can lead to the exposure of the salt-rich subsurface or can lead to the exposure of salt-rich subsurfaces
87: Similar to halite nodules, salt-encrusted surfaces can form. These are composed of sulfate, chloride and nitrate salts and develop a similar efflorescence morphology.
Section 2.1
Am I right that you had 3 sampling sites, where you sampled the a) deliquescence affected area and b) non deliquescence affected area. Then in these 3x2 sites you took 3 samples in the morning for geochemical analysis and 3 for biological samples and the same in the evening?! Did you also disinfect your shovel or sampling equipment?
Would it not also have been nice to repeat that sampling for at least 2 or 3 days for having a better data base.
As Temperature and RH of the air was measured in 2018 and 2019, I guess the samples were also taken during that time? Can you add the time as well, please.
What about statistics? Can you add something about it please?
L137: which standards did you use? And what about blanks?
L161: was conducted
For the PLFAs did you also measure a standard for comparison and identification?
L161: was conducted
You said before that you monitored RH and and temperature between 2018 and 2019 but only show the data during the time of sampling which is great, but I was wondering how to categorize it during this long time series. Where are we here just in a good mean of the time?!
L270: Why did you only analyze the samples taken during the morning for the geochemical analyses?
L395: When you say “follow the water” for the search of life and there is a difference between day and night why did you measure e.g., PLFAs only in the morning?
L446: wind.Hence