Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 21, issue 23
Articles | Volume 21, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5495-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5495-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 21, issue 23
Research article
 | 
11 Dec 2024
Research article |  | 11 Dec 2024

Responses of field-grown maize to different soil types, water regimes, and contrasting vapor pressure deficit

Thuy Huu Nguyen, Thomas Gaiser, Jan Vanderborght, Andrea Schnepf, Felix Bauer, Anja Klotzsche, Lena Lärm, Hubert Hüging, and Frank Ewert

Viewed

Total article views: 721 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
543 129 49 721 51 32 25
  • HTML: 543
  • PDF: 129
  • XML: 49
  • Total: 721
  • Supplement: 51
  • BibTeX: 32
  • EndNote: 25
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jan 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jan 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 721 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 712 with geography defined and 9 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 11 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Leaf water potential was at certain thresholds, depending on soil type, water treatment, and weather conditions. In rainfed plots, the lower water availability in the stony soil resulted in fewer roots with a higher root tissue conductance than the silty soil. In the silty soil, higher stress in the rainfed soil led to more roots with a lower root tissue conductance than in the irrigated plot. Crop responses to water stress can be opposite, depending on soil water conditions that are compared.
Read more
Special issue
Drought, society, and ecosystems (NHESS/BG/GC/HESS inter-journal...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint