Articles | Volume 21, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5495-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5495-2024
Research article
 | 
11 Dec 2024
Research article |  | 11 Dec 2024

Responses of field-grown maize to different soil types, water regimes, and contrasting vapor pressure deficit

Thuy Huu Nguyen, Thomas Gaiser, Jan Vanderborght, Andrea Schnepf, Felix Bauer, Anja Klotzsche, Lena Lärm, Hubert Hüging, and Frank Ewert

Related authors

Comparison of root water uptake models in simulating CO2 and H2O fluxes and growth of wheat
Thuy Huu Nguyen, Matthias Langensiepen, Jan Vanderborght, Hubert Hüging, Cho Miltin Mboh, and Frank Ewert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4943–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4943-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4943-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Earth System Science/Response to Global Change: Climate Change
Sensitivity of tropical woodland savannas to El Niño droughts
Simone Matias Reis, Yadvinder Malhi, Ben Hur Marimon Junior, Beatriz Schwantes Marimon, Huanyuan Zhang-Zheng, Igor Araújo, Renata Freitag, Edmar Almeida de Oliveira, Karine da Silva Peixoto, Luciana Januário de Souza, Ediméia Laura Souza da Silva, Eduarda Bernardes Santos, Kamila Parreira da Silva, Maélly Dállet Alves Gonçalves, Cécile Girardin, Cecilia Dahlsjö, Oliver L. Phillips, and Imma Oliveras Menor
Biogeosciences, 22, 3949–3964, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3949-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3949-2025, 2025
Short summary
Disentangling future effects of climate change and forest disturbance on vegetation composition and land surface properties of the boreal forest
Lucia S. Layritz, Konstantin Gregor, Andreas Krause, Stefan Kruse, Benjamin F. Meyer, Thomas A. M. Pugh, and Anja Rammig
Biogeosciences, 22, 3635–3660, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3635-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3635-2025, 2025
Short summary
Simulating vertical phytoplankton dynamics in a stratified ocean using a two-layered ecosystem model
Qi Zheng, Johannes J. Viljoen, Xuerong Sun, Žarko Kovač, Shubha Sathyendranath, and Robert J. W. Brewin
Biogeosciences, 22, 3253–3278, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3253-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3253-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessing the lifetime of anthropogenic CO2 and its sensitivity to different carbon cycle processes
Christine Kaufhold, Matteo Willeit, Bo Liu, and Andrey Ganopolski
Biogeosciences, 22, 2767–2801, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2767-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2767-2025, 2025
Short summary
Foliar nutrient uptake from dust sustains plant nutrition
Anton Lokshin, Daniel Palchan, Elnatan Golan, Ran Erel, Daniele Andronico, and Avner Gross
Biogeosciences, 22, 2653–2666, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2653-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2653-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdalla, M., Carminati, A., Cai, G., Javaux, M., and Ahmed, M. A.: Stomatal closure of tomato under drought is driven by an increase in soil-root hydraulic resistance, Plant. Cell Environ., 44, 425–431, https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13939, 2021. 
Abdalla, M., Ahmed, M. A., Cai, G., Wankmüller, F., Schwartz, N., Litig, O., Javaux, M., and Carminati, A.: Stomatal closure during water deficit is controlled by below-ground hydraulics, Ann. Bot., 129, 161–170, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcab141, 2022. 
Ahmed, M. A., Zarebanadkouki, M., Meunier, F., Javaux, M., Kaestner, A., and Carminati, A.: Root type matters: Measurement of water uptake by seminal, crown, and lateral roots in maize, J. Exp. Bot., 69, 1199–1206, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx439, 2018. 
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrig. Drain. Pap. No. 56, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-1187(05)80058-6, 1998. 
Aparicio-Tejo, P. and Boyer, J. S.: Significance of Accelerated Leaf Senescence at Low Water Potentials for Water Loss and Grain Yield in Maize1, Crop Sci., 23, 1198–1202, https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300060040x, 1983. 
Download
Short summary
Leaf water potential was at certain thresholds, depending on soil type, water treatment, and weather conditions. In rainfed plots, the lower water availability in the stony soil resulted in fewer roots with a higher root tissue conductance than the silty soil. In the silty soil, higher stress in the rainfed soil led to more roots with a lower root tissue conductance than in the irrigated plot. Crop responses to water stress can be opposite, depending on soil water conditions that are compared.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint