249 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Trade Impacts on Embodied Carbon Emissions—Evidence from the Bilateral Trade between China and Germany J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145076
2. Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study J. Barrett et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.788858
3. A carbon footprint proportional to expenditure - A case for Norway? E. Isaksen & P. Narbel https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.027
4. Environmental Footprints of Agriculture Embodied in International Trade: Sensitivity of Harvested Area Footprint of Chinese Exports J. Weinzettel & R. Wood https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.013
5. The impact of climate changes on agriculture export trade in Pakistan: Evidence from time‐series analysis Y. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12333
6. Biogenic carbon fluxes from global agricultural production and consumption J. Wolf et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005119
7. Global Carbon Budget 2016 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016
8. Residential energy consumption and associated carbon emission in forest rural area in China: A case study in Weichang County F. Lun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2884-1
9. Spatially explicit assessment of water embodied in European trade: A product-level multi-regional input-output analysis S. Lutter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.001
10. Indonesia's contribution to global carbon flows: Which sectors are most responsible for the emissions embodied in trade? E. Wiloso et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.05.005
11. Global Urban Carbon Networks: Linking Inventory to Modeling S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00965
12. A Process‐Model Perspective on Recent Changes in the Carbon Cycle of North America G. Murray‐Tortarolo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG006904
13. A MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT TABLE BASED ON THE GLOBAL TRADE ANALYSIS PROJECT DATABASE (GTAP-MRIO) R. Andrew & G. Peters https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.761953
14. Nitrogen Footprint: A Novel Indicator to Quantify Nitrogen Loss to the Environment A. OITA et al. https://doi.org/10.3370/lca.14.120
15. Renewable Energy for Balancing Carbon Emissions and Reducing Carbon Transfer under Global Value Chains: A Way Forward X. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010234
16. Substantial nitrogen pollution embedded in international trade A. Oita et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2635
17. The Baltic States’ Move toward a Sustainable Energy Future J. Krūmiņš & M. Kļaviņš https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218230
18. Origin and Radiative Forcing of Black Carbon Aerosol: Production and Consumption Perspectives J. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01873
19. Decomposing the anthropogenic causes of climate change A. De Matteis https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-0028-4
20. Uncertainty of Consumption-Based Carbon Accounts J. Rodrigues et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00632
21. CO₂ Embedded in Trade: Trends and Fossil Fuel Drivers S. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2980899
22. Understanding the Role of Energy Productivity, Eco-Innovation and International Trade in Shaping Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions: A Study of BRICS Nations N. Safi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29358-z
23. Quantifying carbon reduction from dietary behavioral changes in Taiwan Y. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2025.2606313
24. Examining differences in public opinion on climate change between college students in China and the USA E. Jamelske et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0229-9
25. Achieving the Paris goals: Consumption-based carbon accounting M. Grasso https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.018
26. Trade Policy Uncertainty, Offshoring, and the Environment: Evidence from US Manufacturing Establishments J. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4345442
27. Uncertainty in temperature response of current consumption-based emissions estimates J. Karstensen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-287-2015
28. Shipborne measurements of methane and carbon dioxide in the Middle East and Mediterranean areas and the contribution from oil and gas emissions J. Paris et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12443-2021
29. Embodied carbon emissions in China-US trade Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9635-x
30. The nexus of environment-related technologies and consumption-based carbon emissions in top five emitters: empirical analysis through dynamic common correlated effects estimator M. Hussain & J. Khan https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15333-z
31. ‘Fair’ inequality, consumption and climate mitigation J. Millward-Hopkins & Y. Oswald https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe14f
32. The economic catch-up of developing countries has mitigated inter-country carbon inequality W. Chen & Z. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.018
33. Identifying critical sectors and supply chain paths for the consumption of domestic resource extraction in China J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.151
34. Changes in the carbon mitigation responsibility of Japan's capital city, Tokyo – analysis of power supply shocks due to nuclear power plant accidents K. Murakami et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101221
35. Empirical study on the impact of international trade and foreign direct investment on carbon emission for belt and road countries Z. Jijian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.122
36. The consumption-based carbon emissions effects of renewable energy and total factor productivity: The evidence from natural gas exporters F. Hasanov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.11.054
37. Urban economy's carbon flow through external trade: Spatial-temporal evolution for Macao B. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.010
38. A Comprehensive Assessment of Anthropogenic and Natural Sources and Sinks of Australasia's Carbon Budget Y. Villalobos et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007845
39. Carbon footprint of a university in a multiregional model: the case of the University of Castilla-La Mancha N. Gómez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.009
40. Investigating environment-society-economy relations in time series in Europe using a synthetic input-state-output framework F. Sporchia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.018
41. Responding to the environmental effects of remittances and trade liberalization in net-importing economies: the role of renewable energy in Sub-Saharan Africa C. Nwani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09403-6
42. Carbon leakage: pollution, trade or politics? G. Michalek & R. Schwarze https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9616-8
43. Carbon fueling complex global value chains tripled in the period 1995–2012 E. Hertwich https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104651
44. Uncovering embodied CO2 flows via North-North trade – A case study of US-Germany trade Q. Wang & Y. Zhou https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.171
45. Carbon emissions embodied in international trade: The post-China era G. Arce et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.084
46. Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus B. Liddle https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.004
47. National attribution of historical climate damages C. Callahan & J. Mankin https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03387-y
48. Impact of Environmental Policy Stringency on Consumption-Based CO2: Role of Economic Policy Uncertainty in Top 11 GDP-Ranked Countries for EKC Hypothesis J. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251361637
49. Reducing the variation of environmental footprint estimates based on multiregional input–output databases P. E. Marian Scott, Prof Daniela Cocch et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2014-0006
50. Beyond Production-Based Accounting: A Comparative SWOT Analysis of GHG Inventory Frameworks and Their Policy Implications R. Gil et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13120240
51. Upscaling Tower-Based Net Ecosystem Productivity to 250 m Resolution with Flux Site Distribution Considerations Q. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030426
52. Changes in per capita CO2 emissions of six large Japanese cities between 1980 and 2000: An analysis using “The Four System Boundaries” approach K. Murakami et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101784
53. Global appropriation of resources causes high international material inequality – Growth is not the solution A. Schaffartzik et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.008
54. Quantifying the potential for consumer-oriented policy to reduce European and foreign carbon emissions D. Moran et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1551186
55. International Carbon Trade and Domestic Climate Politics K. Harrison https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00310
56. Accounting methods for international land-related leakage and distant deforestation drivers S. Henders & M. Ostwald https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.005
57. Evolution of the Scientific Literature on Input–Output Analysis: A Bibliometric Analysis of 1990–2017 Y. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093135
58. EU carbon emissions by multinational enterprises under control-based accounting M. Ortiz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105104
59. Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems J. Dearing et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.012
60. Environmental impact of using specialty feed ingredients in swine and poultry production: A life cycle assessment1 E. Kebreab et al. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9036
61. The Slowdown in Global Air-Pollutant Emission Growth and Driving Factors J. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.08.013
62. Variation in trends of consumption based carbon accounts R. Wood et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0102-x
63. Definitions and methods to estimate regional land carbon fluxes for the second phase of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Project (RECCAP-2) P. Ciais et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1289-2022
64. From digital infrastructure divides to embodied carbon transfer: Evidence from agricultural trade in major global countries C. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2026.103818
65. Life-Cycle Sustainability for Vision 2030: The Impact of Life-cycle Sustainability Practices on Sustainability Performance of Saudi Oil and Gas Sector A. Ghaithan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-025-10338-z
66. Implications of a consumption-based accounting of greenhouse gas emissions from global dairy cattle systems D. Caro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100268
67. Sustaining the low-carbon emission development in Asia and beyond: Sustainable energy, water, transportation and low-carbon emission technology C. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.144
68. Tele-connection of global agricultural land network: Incorporating complex network approach with multi-regional input-output analysis M. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106464
69. Sources of Uncertainty in Regional and Global Terrestrial CO2 Exchange Estimates A. Bastos et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006393
70. Financial Instability and Consumption-based Carbon Emission in E-7 Countries: The Role of Trade and Economic Growth A. Safi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.034
71. Ecological footprint of nations: Comparison of process analysis, and standard and hybrid multiregional input–output analysis J. Weinzettel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.020
72. Decoupling and displaced emissions: on Swedish consumers, Chinese producers and policy to address the climate impact of consumption C. Isenhour & K. Feng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.037
73. National accounting systems as a foundation for embedded emissions accounting in trade-related climate policies A. Reeve & E. Aisbett https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133678
74. Tracking the carbon emissions of Denmark's five regions from a producer and consumer perspective O. Albert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106778
75. Atmospheric Mercury Outflow from China and Interprovincial Trade L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03951
76. A synthesis of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel combustion R. Andres et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1845-2012
77. An Australian Multi‐Regional Waste Supply‐Use Framework J. Fry et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12376
78. Large greenhouse gas savings due to changes in the post-Soviet food systems F. Schierhorn et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1cf1
79. The Australian terrestrial carbon budget V. Haverd et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-851-2013
80. Discrepancies in Carbon Emissions Accounting for Korea’s Steel Industry: A Comparative Analysis of GTAP and OECD ICIO Databases J. Shin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2025.2483321
81. The role of outsourcing in driving global carbon emissions A. Malik & J. Lan https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2016.1172475
82. Global Carbon Budget 2015 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-349-2015
83. From Unidisciplinary to Multidisciplinary Rebound Research: Lessons Learned for Comprehensive Climate and Energy Policies T. Santarius et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00104
84. Hidden emissions of forest transitions: a socio-ecological reading of forest change S. Gingrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.04.005
85. An assessment of the performance of scenarios against historical global emissions for IPCC reports J. Strandsbjerg Tristan Pedersen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102199
86. Empirical Comparison of Input‐Output Methods for Life Cycle Assessment Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12133
87. Emissions in a decarbonised economy? Global lessons from a carbon footprint analysis of Iceland J. Clarke et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.108
88. An integration of net imported emissions into climate change targets K. Scott & J. Barrett https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.016
89. How strong is public support for unilateral climate policy and what drives it? L. McGrath & T. Bernauer https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.484
90. Trends in national biodiversity footprints of land use E. Bjelle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107059
91. Global carbon budget 2014 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-47-2015
92. State of the science in reconciling top‐down and bottom‐up approaches for terrestrial CO2 budget M. Kondo et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14917
93. Globalization and pollution: tele-connecting local primary PM 2.5 emissions to global consumption J. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0380
94. Unleashing the green potential: exploring the dynamic influence of the urban digital economy on carbon emissions X. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00739-8
95. EFFECTS OF SECTOR AGGREGATION ON CO2MULTIPLIERS IN MULTIREGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSES K. Steen-Olsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2014.934325
96. The impact of technological innovation and public‐private partnership investment on sustainable environment in China: Consumption‐based carbon emissions analysis Z. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2086
97. Tracing CO2 emissions in global value chains B. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.013
98. New data‐driven estimation of terrestrial CO2 fluxes in Asia using a standardized database of eddy covariance measurements, remote sensing data, and support vector regression K. Ichii et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003640
99. Global climate forcing of aerosols embodied in international trade J. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2798
100. Carbon neutrality challenges in Belt and Road countries: what factors can contribute to CO2 emissions mitigation? F. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22983-0
101. CONVERGENCE BETWEEN THE EORA, WIOD, EXIOBASE, AND OPENEU'S CONSUMPTION-BASED CARBON ACCOUNTS D. Moran & R. Wood https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2014.935298
102. Institutional quality and environmental sustainability: The role of freedom of press in most freedom of press countries J. Riti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106656
103. Does financial stability and renewable energy promote sustainable environment in G-7 Countries? The role of income and international trade A. Safi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13991-7
104. An environmentally extended global multi-regional input–output analysis of consumption-based and embodied import-based carbon emissions of Turkey N. Mangır & Ü. Şahin https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19290-z
105. Energy, Water and Environmental Footprint Interactions: Implications for the Major Economy Sectors of Europe, South East Asia and Worldwide J. Klemeš et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.630
106. China’s Land Uses in the Multi-Region Input–Output Framework C. Bao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162940
107. Mapping the international flows of GHG emissions within a more feasible consumption-based framework D. Caro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.106
108. Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions F. Pendrill et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.002
109. Mapping the Carbon Footprint of Nations K. Kanemoto et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03227
110. Dual issue of resources and emissions: Resources richness and Carbon Emissions with Oil rents, trade, and mineral rents exploration B. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104066
111. INVESTIGATING ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO HARMONISE MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT DATA A. Geschke et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2014.937069
112. Spatial consumption-based carbon footprint assessments - A review of recent developments in the field J. Heinonen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120335
113. Tourism carbon footprint inventories: A review of the environmentally extended input-output approach Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102928
114. The global emission mitigation potential of avoiding waste and product lifespan extension by Chinese households B. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24322
115. Global Carbon Budget 2021 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
116. Which emissions belong to us? The case for contributory value-chain emissions accounting C. Barry & G. Cullity https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X241312425
117. Cropland area embodied in international trade: Contradictory results from different approaches T. Kastner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.003
118. Pollution Offshoring and Emission Reductions in EU and US Manufacturing C. Brunel https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0035-1
119. Global Carbon Budget 2018 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018
120. Does technological innovation limit trade-adjusted carbon emissions? S. Wahab https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13345-3
121. Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Economic Growth: An Assessment Based on Production and Consumption Emission Inventories O. Fernández-Amador et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.004
122. Understanding New Zealand’s consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions: an application of multi-regional input-output analysis C. Chandrakumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01673-z
123. Supply versus use designs of environmental extensions in input–output analysis: Conceptual and empirical implications for the case of energy H. Wieland et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12975
124. The development of climate institutions in the United States M. Mildenberger https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1947445
125. Heterogeneous effects of remittances and institutional quality in reducing environmental deficit in the presence of EKC hypothesis: A global study with the application of panel quantile regression M. Usman & A. Jahanger https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13216-x
126. Consumption-based carbon accounting: sense and sensibility A. Tukker et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1728208
127. National Policies for Global Emission Reductions: Effectiveness of Carbon Emission Reductions in International Supply Chains S. Nabernegg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.006
128. Implying climate impact from carbon prices and consumption N. Jessop et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2531094
129. Evidence of decoupling consumption-based CO2 emissions from economic growth K. Hubacek et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100074
130. The Political Feasibility of Consumption-Based Carbon Accounting M. Grasso https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2016.1115828
131. Tracing global supply chains to air pollution hotspots D. Moran & K. Kanemoto https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094017
132. Tracing CO2 Emissions in Global Value Chains B. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2541893
133. Research hotspots and trends of carbon neutrality in international trade J. YU et al. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20220514
134. Profiting in a Warming World: Investigating the Link Between Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Capitalist Profitability in OECD States M. Soener https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12559
135. Using Deep Learning to Fill Data Gaps in Environmental Footprint Accounting B. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01640
136. A Carbon Footprint Proportional to Expenditure - a Case for Norway? P. Narbel & E. Isaksen https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2425600
137. On the sustainable trade development: Do Financial inclusion and eco‐innovation matter? Evidence from method of moments quantile regression Q. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2298
138. Assessment of the sustainability of Mexico green investments in the road to Paris S. Banacloche et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111458
139. Analyzing the Effects of Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Usage and Technological Innovation on Environmental Sustainability: Evidence from QUAD Economies M. Imran et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315552
140. Global carbon budget 2013 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-235-2014
141. Export quality upgrading and environmental sustainability: Evidence from the East Asia and Pacific Region V. Trinh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101632
142. Global Carbon Budget 2017 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018
143. EU corporate action as a driver for global emissions abatement: A structural analysis of EU international supply chain carbon dioxide emissions A. Skelton https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.024
144. Global Carbon Budget 2022 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022
145. Input–output and life-cycle emissions accounting: applications in the real world S. Kokoni & J. Skea https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.864190
146. Effect of aggregation and disaggregation on embodied material use of products in input–output analysis A. de Koning et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.05.008
147. Attribution of CO 2 emissions from Brazilian deforestation to consumers between 1990 and 2010 J. Karstensen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024005
148. Environmental regulations, political risk and consumption-based carbon emissions: Evidence from OECD economies T. Hassan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115893
149. Decoupling or delusion? Measuring emissions displacement in foreign trade M. Jiborn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.006
150. Policies and Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions from a Top-Down and a Bottom-Up Perspective K. Wiebe et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2016.71003
151. Global Carbon Budget 2019 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
152. Global Carbon Budget 2020 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020
153. Unveiling the symbiotic effect of trade-embodied carbon: An examination of China’s interactions with Pacific Rim countries W. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-025-2427-z
154. Worldwide fluctuations in carbon emissions: Characterization and synchronization M. Calvia https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100054
155. Global land-water nexus: Agricultural land and freshwater use embodied in worldwide supply chains B. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.138
156. Unraveling the claims for (and against) green growth T. Jackson & P. Victor https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay0749
157. To RAS or not to RAS? What is the difference in outcomes in multi-regional input–output models? K. Wiebe & M. Lenzen https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2016.1192528
158. Understanding the trends in Denmark's global food trade-related greenhouse gas and resource footprint A. Osei-Owusu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127785
159. Multi-gas and multi-source comparisons of six land use emission datasets and AFOLU estimates in the Fifth Assessment Report, for the tropics for 2000–2005 R. Roman-Cuesta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5799-2016
160. Austria’s consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions: Identifying sectoral sources and destinations K. Steininger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.011
161. A comprehensive review of uncertainty in multi-regional input–output modelling M. Badr et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111649
162. Unearthing human progress? Ecomodernism and contrasting definitions of technological progress in the Anthropocene C. Isenhour https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12063
163. Environmental and resource footprints in a global context: Europe’s structural deficit in resource endowments A. Tukker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.002
164. The cleanup of US manufacturing through pollution offshoring J. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2025.104046
165. The role of negative emissions in meeting China’s 2060 carbon neutrality goal J. Fuhrman et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgab004
166. The Devil in the Deal: Trade Embedded Emissions and the Durban Platform C. Isenhour https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2012.730241
167. POLICY-RELEVANT APPLICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTALLY EXTENDED MRIO DATABASES – EXPERIENCES FROM THE UK T. Wiedmann & J. Barrett https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.761596
168. Variability in historical emissions trends suggests a need for a wide range of global scenarios and regional analyses J. Pedersen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00045-y
169. Accounting for value added embodied in trade and consumption: an intercomparison of global multiregional input–output databases K. Steen-Olsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2016.1141751
170. How does a social practice perspective add to the development of policy instruments to reduce consumption-based CO2 emissions? A case study of Austria M. Kammerlander et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1727830
171. GLOBAL MULTIREGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT FRAMEWORKS: AN INTRODUCTION AND OUTLOOK A. Tukker & E. Dietzenbacher https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.761179
172. Constraining future terrestrial carbon cycle projections using observation‐based water and carbon flux estimates S. Mystakidis et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13217
173. Assessing urban low-carbon performance from a metabolic perspective S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-020-9807-y
174. A study of ecologically unequal exchange for 89 countries between 1990 and 2015 F. Hao https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.01.009
175. Does Energy Productivity and Technological Innovation Limit Trade-Adjusted Carbon Emissions? S. Wahab et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860111
176. International trade of global scarce water use in agriculture: Modeling on watershed level with monthly resolution J. Weinzettel & S. Pfister https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.032
177. Can Reducing Income Inequality Decouple Economic Growth from CO2 Emissions? J. McGee & P. Greiner https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118772716
178. Estimating cropland carbon mitigation potentials in China affected by three improved cropland practices F. Lun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3813-2
179. Three‐scope carbon emission inventories of global cities T. Wiedmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13063
180. Integrating terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems to constrain estimates of land-atmosphere carbon exchange J. Casas-Ruiz et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37232-2
181. Not All Emissions Are Created Equal: Multidimensionality in Nations’ Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Affluence/Emissions Nexus X. Huang https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241238962
182. Trends of the EU’s territorial and consumption-based emissions from 1990 to 2016 J. Karstensen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2296-x
183. Global trade in the Anthropocene: A review of trends and direction of environmental factor flows during the Great Acceleration J. Brolin & A. Kander https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019620973711
184. Physical and virtual carbon metabolism of global cities S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13757-3
185. Global outsourcing of carbon emissions 1995–2009: A reassessment N. Baumert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.010
186. Consumption‐based carbon accounting: does it have a future? S. Afionis et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.438
187. Price Corrected Domestic Technology Assumption—A Method To Assess Pollution Embodied in Trade Using Primary Official Statistics Only. With a Case on CO2Emissions Embodied in Imports to Europe A. Tukker et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es303217f
188. Methods for attributing land-use emissions to products S. Davis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2014.913867
189. A Note on the Magnitude of the Feedback Effect in Environmentally Extended Multi‐Region Input‐Output Tables D. Moran et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12658
190. A geo-prediction model for estimating global terrestrial net ecosystem productivity based on the third law of geography Q. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103844
191. How does environmental policy stringency influence green innovation for environmental managements? P. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117766
192. The global carbon budget 1959–2011 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-165-2013
193. Empirical estimates of regional carbon budgets imply reduced global soil heterotrophic respiration P. Ciais et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa145
194. Developing country finance in a post-2020 global climate agreement P. Hannam et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2731
195. Global inequalities in ownership-based carbon footprints L. Chancel & Y. Rehm https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02662-5
196. Bridging the green gap: Do green finance and digital transformation influence sustainable development? A. Safi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107566
197. Recent Progress in Assessment of Resource Efficiency and Environmental Impacts Embodied in Trade: An Introduction to this Special Issue A. Tukker et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12736
198. Exploring the asymmetries between trade and consumption-based carbon emissions: evidence from NPARDL approach . Najibullah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13455-y
199. FIGARO-E3: a high-resolution extended multi-regional input-output database consistent with official statistics I. Cazcarro et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04431-z
200. Developing countries’ responsibilities for CO2 emissions in value chains are larger and growing faster than those of developed countries B. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.01.006
201. The carbon border adjustment mechanism is inefficient in addressing carbon leakage and results in unfair welfare losses X. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2023.02.026
202. Emissions burden shifting in global value chains – winners and losers under multi-regional versus bilateral accounting M. Cadarso et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2018.1431768
203. Pollution Havens? Carbon Taxes, Globalization, and the Geography of Emissions C. Schroeder & L. Stracca https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-025-00288-9
204. Environmental and social footprints of international trade T. Wiedmann & M. Lenzen https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0113-9
205. Beyond peak emission transfers: historical impacts of globalization and future impacts of climate policies on international emission transfers R. Wood et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1619507
206. Reducing uncertainties in decadal variability of the global carbon budget with multiple datasets W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603956113
207. The Asymmetrical Effects of Economic Development on Consumption-based and Production-based Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 1990 to 2014 X. Huang & A. Jorgenson https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118773626
208. Determinants of consumption-based and production-based carbon emissions C. Emenekwe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04311-9
209. Environmental sustainability and decent work G. Montt & N. Maitre https://doi.org/10.1002/wow3.138
210. Re‐framing the climate change debate in the livestock sector: mitigation and adaptation options M. Rivera‐Ferre et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.421
211. Short-time effect of harvesting methods on soil respiration dynamics in a beech forest in southern Mediterranean Italy V. Coletta et al. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2032-010
212. Allocation of global temperature change to consumers J. Karstensen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1333-2
213. Structural Change for a Post-Growth Economy: Investigating the Relationship between Embodied Energy Intensity and Labour Productivity L. Hardt et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030962
214. Enablers of Carbon Neutrality in China’s Energy Sector: A Review Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062657
215. Consumption-based versus production-based accounting of CO2 emissions: Is there evidence for carbon leakage? A. Franzen & S. Mader https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.009
216. Financial inclusion and trade adjusted carbon emissions: Evaluating the role of environment related taxes employing non‐parametric panel methods N. Xin & Z. Xie https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2375
217. Implications of the distribution of German household environmental footprints across income groups for integrating environmental and social policy design G. Hardadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13045
218. The Impact of Energy Productivity and Eco-Innovation on Sustainable Environment in Emerging Seven (E-7) Countries: Does Institutional Quality Matter? A. Safi et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.878243
219. A Study Regarding the Relationship between Carbon Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Economic Development in the Context of the Energy Growth Nexus L. Mihai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174526
220. Energy consumption-based accounts: A comparison of results using different energy extension vectors A. Owen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.089
221. Impact of cutting meat intake on hidden greenhouse gas emissions in an import-reliant city Y. Yau et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabd45
222. On the feasibility of a consumer-based allocation method in national GHG inventories D. Caro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.021
223. The asymmetry of economic growth and the carbon intensity of well-being P. Greiner & J. McGee https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2019.1675567
224. Towards net zero nutrition: The contribution of demand-side change to mitigating UK food emissions A. Garvey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125672
225. Towards Robust, Authoritative Assessments of Environmental Impacts Embodied in Trade: Current State and Recommendations A. Tukker et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12716
226. Hotspots of gross emissions from the land use sector: patterns, uncertainties, and leading emission sources for the period 2000–2005 in the tropics R. Roman-Cuesta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4253-2016
227. Uncovering blind spots in urban carbon management: the role of consumption-based carbon accounting in Bristol, UK J. Millward-Hopkins et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1112-x
228. COMPARING THE GTAP-MRIO AND WIOD DATABASES FOR CARBON FOOTPRINT ANALYSIS I. Arto et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2014.939949
229. Navigating carbon emissions in G-7 economies: a quantile regression analysis of environmental-economic interplay B. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29722-z
230. After Paris: transitions for sustainable consumption D. Welch & D. Southerton https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2018.1560861
231. Drivers of CO2 emissions from electricity generation in the European Union 2000–2015 J. Rodrigues et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110104
232. Wealth Inequality and Carbon Emissions in High-income Countries K. Knight et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496517704872
233. An asymmetric analysis of the role of exports and imports in consumption-based carbon emissions in the G7 economies: evidence from nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag model . Najibullah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14465-6
234. International trade and consumption-based carbon emissions: evaluating the role of composite risk for RCEP economies T. Hassan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15617-4
235. Consumption-based carbon emissions and trade nexus: Evidence from nine oil exporting countries Z. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104806
236. The structure, drivers and policy implications of the European carbon footprint R. Wood et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1639489
237. Beyond production and consumption: using throughflows to untangle the virtual trade of externalities T. Beaufils et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2023.2174003
238. Quantifying city-scale carbon emissions of the construction sector based on multi-regional input-output analysis C. Hung et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.013
239. Is Seasonal Households’ Consumption Good for the Nexus Carbon/Water Footprint? The Spanish Fruits and Vegetables Case M. Tobarra et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00221
240. Financial accessibility and environmental performance: a trade-adjusted analysis of renewable energy’s impact in major emerging markets S. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05744-5
241. A compromise to break the climate impasse M. Grasso & J. Roberts https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2259
242. China's “Exported Carbon” Peak: Patterns, Drivers, and Implications Z. Mi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077915
243. Carbon dioxide emissions and international trade at the turn of the millennium O. Fernández-Amador et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.005
244. Revising Emission Responsibilities through Consumption-Based Accounting: A European and Post-Brexit Perspective P. Fezzigna et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020488
245. Disequilibrium of terrestrial ecosystem CO2 budget caused by disturbance-induced emissions and non-CO2 carbon export flows: a global model assessment A. Ito https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-685-2019
246. Consumption- Versus Production-Based Emission Policies M. Jakob et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012342
247. Virtual carbon and water flows embodied in international trade: a review on consumption-based analysis X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.129
248. The role of Economic Policy Uncertainty and Foreign Direct Investment on Consumption- Based Carbon Emission in G7 Countries H. Güngör https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4816362
249. Towards accepted procedures for calculating international consumption-based carbon accounts A. Tukker et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1722605