174 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Methane emissions from global rice fields: Magnitude, spatiotemporal patterns, and environmental controls B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005381
2. Solar radiation drives methane emissions from the shoots of Scots pine S. Tenhovirta et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18120
3. Advancements and opportunities to improve bottom–up estimates of global wetland methane emissions Q. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adad02
4. Cold‐Season Methane Fluxes Simulated by GCP‐CH4 Models A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103037
5. Spatio-temporal dynamics of water use efficiency over forest ecosystems using time series satellite data and carbon flux measurements T. Sett et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121385
6. Estimation of methane emissions from inundated areas in northern Eurasia using a process-based model and remotely sensed inundation dynamics data A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-025-00786-4
7. Agriculture-informed Neural Networks for Predicting Nitrous Oxide Emissions C. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1145/3696113
8. Global Carbon Budget 2016 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016
9. Estimation of Canada's methane emissions: inverse modelling analysis using the Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) measurement network M. Ishizawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10013-2024
10. Modelling methane emissions from natural wetlands by development and application of the TRIPLEX-GHG model Q. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-981-2014
11. Development of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and the evaluation of biogeochemical processes and feedbacks T. Hajima et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020
12. PMIP4 experiments using MIROC-ES2L Earth system model R. Ohgaito et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1195-2021
13. Disequilibrium of terrestrial ecosystem CO2 budget caused by disturbance-induced emissions and non-CO2 carbon export flows: a global model assessment A. Ito https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-685-2019
14. A model-independent open-source geospatial tool for managing point-based environmental model simulations at multiple spatial locations K. Thorp & K. Bronson https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.002
15. Long-term changes in CH4 emissions: Comparing ΔCH4/ΔCO2 ratios between observation and proved model in East Asia (2010–2020) S. Kenea et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119437
16. European anthropogenic AFOLU greenhouse gas emissions: a review and benchmark data A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-961-2020
17. Uncertainties in the national inventory of methane emissions from rice cultivation: field measurements and modeling approaches W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-163-2017
18. The terrestrial carbon budget of South and Southeast Asia M. Cervarich et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/105006
19. Global Carbon Budget 2017 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018
20. Plant nutrient acquisition under elevated CO2 and implications for the land carbon sink T. Cambron et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02386-y
21. The Global N2O Model Intercomparison Project H. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0212.1
22. Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review L. Spafford & A. MacDougall https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5863-2021
23. Weakened growth of cropland‐N2O emissions in China associated with nationwide policy interventions Z. Shang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14741
24. Pronounced inter-model uncertainties in TRENDY-simulated terrestrial carbon sink responses to hydroclimatic extremes Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae4b55
25. Multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) observations of formaldehyde and nitrogen dioxide at three sites in Asia and comparison with the global chemistry transport model CHASER H. Hoque et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12559-2022
26. Detectability of Arctic methane sources at six sites performing continuous atmospheric measurements T. Thonat et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8371-2017
27. Dynamics of Ecosystem Water Use Efficiency in Citrus Orchards of Central India Using Eddy Covariance and Landsat Measurements S. Peddinti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00416-3
28. Satellite-detected large CO2 release in southwestern North America during the 2020–2021 drought and associated wildfires H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad3cf7
29. Long-term and Multidisciplinary Research on Carbon Cycling and Forest Ecosystem Functions in a Mountainous Landscape: Development and Perspectives H. MURAOKA et al. https://doi.org/10.5026/jgeography.128.129
30. Global Carbon Budget 2022 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022
31. Methane dynamics in vegetated habitats in inland waters: quantification, regulation, and global significance P. Bodmer et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1332968
32. Inter-seasonal and spatial distribution of ground-level greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, N2O) over Nagpur in India and their management roadmap D. Majumdar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5829-2
33. Temperate northern hemisphere dominates the global soil CH4 sink X. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-7126-3
34. Discrepancies between Global Forest Net Primary Productivity Estimates Derived from MODIS and Forest Inventory Data and Underlying Factors J. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13081441
35. Pinus sylvestris as a missing source of nitrous oxide and methane in boreal forest K. Machacova et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23410
36. Description and basic evaluation of simulated mean state, internal variability, and climate sensitivity in MIROC6 H. Tatebe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2727-2019
37. Exploring sub-daily to seasonal variations in methane exchange in a single-crop rice paddy in central Japan H. Iwata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.015
38. Observational constraints reduce model spread but not uncertainty in global wetland methane emission estimates K. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16755
39. Assessment of Anthropogenic Methane Emissions over Large Regions Based on GOSAT Observations and High Resolution Transport Modeling R. Janardanan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090941
40. Machine-learning-based estimates of global natural vegetated wetland methane emissions (2000–2025) M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3507-2026
41. Global methane and nitrous oxide emissions from terrestrial ecosystems due to multiple environmental changes H. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/EHS14-0015.1
42. Spatial and temporal patterns of methane uptake in the urban environment Y. Bezyk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101073
43. Green water will deviate the planetary boundary twice by the end of the 21st Century D. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2026.105482
44. Does replacing coal with wood lower CO 2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy J. Sterman et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa512
45. A 4D-Var inversion system based on the icosahedral grid model (NICAM-TM 4D-Var v1.0) – Part 2: Optimization scheme and identical twin experiment of atmospheric CO2 inversion Y. Niwa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2201-2017
46. Methane Emission Estimates by the Global High-Resolution Inverse Model Using National Inventories F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212489
47. Global Methane Budget 2000–2020 M. Saunois et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1873-2025
48. Recent stabilization of agricultural non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions in China Y. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaf040
49. Melt period methane emissions in northern high latitude wetlands are governed by the length of the period and presence of permafrost S. Hyvärinen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7555-2026
50. Variability and quasi-decadal changes in the methane budget over the period 2000–2012 M. Saunois et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017
51. Multi-model ensemble successfully predicted atmospheric methane consumption in soils across the complex landscape M. Glagolev et al. https://doi.org/10.18822/edgcc625761
52. Multi-spatial scale assessment and multi-dataset fusion of global terrestrial evapotranspiration datasets Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6445-2025
53. Sensitivity of land use change emission estimates to historical land use and land cover mapping S. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005360
54. Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics of global wetlands: comprehensive evaluation of a new sub-grid TOPMODEL parameterization and uncertainties Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1387-2016
55. Uncertainty Quantification of Global Net Methane Emissions From Terrestrial Ecosystems Using a Mechanistically Based Biogeochemistry Model L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005428
56. Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP D. Stevenson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020
57. More enhanced non-growing season methane exchanges under warming on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170438
58. Simulations of atmospheric methane for Cape Grim, Tasmania, to constrain southeastern Australian methane emissions Z. Loh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-305-2015
59. MIROC-INTEG-LAND version 1: a global biogeochemical land surface model with human water management, crop growth, and land-use change T. Yokohata et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4713-2020
60. Country-Scale Analysis of Methane Emissions with a High-Resolution Inverse Model Using GOSAT and Surface Observations R. Janardanan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030375
61. Methane uptake by four land-use types in the agro-pastoral region of northern China Y. Rong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.003
62. Toward a long-term atmospheric CO2 inversion for elucidating natural carbon fluxes: technical notes of NISMON-CO2 v2021.1 Y. Niwa et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-022-00502-6
63. Methane uptake in a temperate forest soil using continuous closed-chamber measurements M. Ueyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.05.004
64. Controlling variables and emission factors of methane from global rice fields J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10419-2018
65. Inferring methane fluxes at a larch forest using Lagrangian, Eulerian, and hybrid inverse models M. Ueyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002716
66. The consolidated European synthesis of CH4 and N2O emissions for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2019 A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023
67. Comparative Review of Global Methane Budget Estimation: Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Integrated Approaches B. Alem et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18091336
68. Modeling the large-scale effects of surface moisture heterogeneity on wetland carbon fluxes in the West Siberian Lowland T. Bohn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6559-2013
69. Global Carbon Budget 2021 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
70. Fraction of nitrous oxide production in nitrification and its effect on total soil emission: A meta-analysis and global-scale sensitivity analysis using a process-based model M. Inatomi et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219159
71. A conjugate BFGS method for accurate estimation of a posterior error covariance matrix in a linear inverse problem Y. Niwa & Y. Fujii https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3838
72. Best practices in software development for robust and reproducible geoscientific models based on insights from the Global Carbon Budget's dynamic vegetation models K. Gregor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2407-2026
73. On the scaling of climate impact indicators with global mean temperature increase: a case study of terrestrial ecosystems and water resources A. Tanaka et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1911-6
74. Methane emissions from Australia estimated by inverse analysis using in-situ and Satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2025.2488595
75. Bottom‐Up Evaluation of the Methane Budget in Asia and Its Subregions A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007723
76. Dynamics and environmental drivers of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes at the soil and ecosystem levels in a wet tropical forest L. Bréchet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-8031-2025
77. Variations of tropospheric methane over Japan during 1988–2010 T. Umezawa et al. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.23837
78. Development and Evaluation of a Multi-Year Fractional Surface Water Data Set Derived from Active/Passive Microwave Remote Sensing Data R. Schroeder et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71215843
79. HIMMELI v1.0: HelsinkI Model of MEthane buiLd-up and emIssion for peatlands M. Raivonen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4665-2017
80. Air temperature and precipitation constraining the modelled wetland methane emissions in a boreal region in northern Europe T. Aalto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-323-2025
81. Land-use and land-cover change carbon emissions between 1901 and 2012 constrained by biomass observations W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5053-2017
82. Quantification of the ecosystem carrying capacity on China’s Loess Plateau W. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.020
83. Interannual variability on methane emissions in monsoon Asia derived from GOSAT and surface observations F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd352
84. The global methane budget 2000–2012 M. Saunois et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016
85. Estimation of fire-induced carbon emissions from Equatorial Asia in 2015 using in situ aircraft and ship observations Y. Niwa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9455-2021
86. How Will Deforestation and Vegetation Degradation Affect Global Fire Activity? C. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001786
87. Global carbon budget 2013 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-235-2014
88. Using Atmospheric Inverse Modelling of Methane Budgets with Copernicus Land Water and Wetness Data to Detect Land Use-Related Emissions M. Tenkanen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16010124
89. Sandy soils in the forests of northern Michigan (USA) as methane sinks: Impacts of tree species composition and winter snowpacks C. Kasmerchak et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122527
90. Observational evidence of high methane emissions over a city in western India N. Chandra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.007
91. The Role of Emission Sources and Atmospheric Sink in the Seasonal Cycle of CH4 and δ13-CH4: Analysis Based on the Atmospheric Chemistry Transport Model TM5 V. Kangasaho et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060888
92. Seasonal Variations of CO₂, CH₄, N₂O and CO in the Mid-Troposphere over the Western North Pacific Observed Using a C-130H Cargo Aircraft Y. NIWA et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2014-104
93. Improved global estimations of gross primary productivity of natural vegetation types by incorporating plant functional type S. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102328
94. Scaling relations between leaf and plant water use efficiencies in rainfed Cotton S. Chintala et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108680
95. Constraining models for methane oxidation based on long-term continuous chamber measurements in a temperate forest soil M. Ueyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108654
96. Effect of varying soil water potentials on methanogenesis in aerated marshland soils D. Wagner https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14980-y
97. Methane (CH4) emission estimates for South Korea using Lagrangian-based inversion modeling (2010–2021) S. Kenea et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100440
98. Spring onsets of a young forest in interior Alaska determined based on time‑lapse camera and eddy covariance measurements S. KAWASHIMA et al. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-21-00003
99. Reviews and syntheses: Four decades of modeling methane cycling in terrestrial ecosystems X. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3735-2016
100. Global and Regional CH4 Emissions for 1995–2013 Derived From Atmospheric CH4, δ13C‐CH4, and δD‐CH4 Observations and a Chemical Transport Model R. Fujita et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032903
101. Temporal Variations of the Mole Fraction, Carbon, and Hydrogen Isotope Ratios of Atmospheric Methane in the Hudson Bay Lowlands, Canada R. Fujita et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027972
102. Global soil nitrous oxide emissions since the preindustrial era estimated by an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models: Magnitude, attribution, and uncertainty H. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14514
103. Global CH4 fluxes derived from JAXA/GOSAT lower-tropospheric partial column data and the CarbonTracker Europe-CH4 atmospheric inverse model A. Tsuruta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7829-2025
104. Global Carbon Budget 2025 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3211-2026
105. Evaluating CHASER V4.0 global formaldehyde (HCHO) simulations using satellite, aircraft, and ground-based remote-sensing observations H. Hoque et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5545-2024
106. Seasonal Variations of CH4 Emissions in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China Are Driven by Agricultural Activities W. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0383-9
107. Regional Methane Emission Estimation Based on Observed Atmospheric Concentrations (2002-2012) P. PATRA et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2016-006
108. Bottom-up evaluation of the regional methane budget of northern lands from 1980 to 2015 A. Ito https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2020.100558
109. Utilizing Earth Observations of Soil Freeze/Thaw Data and Atmospheric Concentrations to Estimate Cold Season Methane Emissions in the Northern High Latitudes M. Tenkanen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13245059
110. Do Soil Methanotrophs Really Remove About 5% of Atmospheric Methane? X. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091864
111. Strong sensitivity of the isotopic composition of methane to the plausible range of tropospheric chlorine S. Strode et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8405-2020
112. Methane uptake in global forest and grassland soils from 1981 to 2010 L. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.082
113. Frontiers in Hydrology and Water Resources Research T. TANAKA et al. https://doi.org/10.3178/jjshwr.31.509
114. The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017 M. Saunois et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020
115. The consolidated European synthesis of CH4 and N2O emissions for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2017 A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2307-2021
116. Estimation of methane emission from rice paddy soils in Japan using the diagnostic ecosystem model T. SASAI et al. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-16-00013
117. An observation-constrained assessment of the climate sensitivity and future trajectories of wetland methane emissions E. Koffi et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay4444
118. Partitioning anthropogenic and natural methane emissions in Finland during 2000–2021 by combining bottom-up and top-down estimates M. Tenkanen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2181-2025
119. The carbon budget of South Asia P. Patra et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-513-2013
120. Recent Changes in Global Photosynthesis and Terrestrial Ecosystem Respiration Constrained From Multiple Observations W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076622
121. Global methane emission estimates for 2000–2012 from CarbonTracker Europe-CH4 v1.0 A. Tsuruta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1261-2017
122. Meteorological Control of Subtropical South American Methane Emissions Estimated from GOSAT Observations H. Takagi et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2021-037
123. Model-based evaluation of methane emissions from paddy fields in East Asia A. ITO et al. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-21-00037
124. Methane budget of East Asia, 1990–2015: A bottom-up evaluation A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.263
125. Global Carbon Budget 2023 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023
126. Influence of methane emissions on the GHG emissions of fossil fuels B. Pieprzyk & P. Hilje https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1959
127. Variations in global methane sources and sinks during 1910–2010 A. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2595-2015
128. Global Carbon Budget 2015 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-349-2015
129. Methane emissions from global wetlands: An assessment of the uncertainty associated with various wetland extent data sets B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.001
130. Denitrification and associated nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide emissions from the Amazonian wetlands J. Guilhen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4297-2020
131. Global responses of wetland methane emissions to extreme temperature and precipitation M. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118907
132. Analysis of atmospheric CH4 in Canadian Arctic and estimation of the regional CH4 fluxes M. Ishizawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4637-2019
133. Methane exchange in a poorly-drained black spruce forest over permafrost observed using the eddy covariance technique H. Iwata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.08.252
134. Importance of root uptake of 14CO2 on 14C transfer to plants impacted by below-ground 14CH4 release M. Ota & T. Tanaka https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.012
135. Enhanced Methane Emissions during Amazonian Drought by Biomass Burning M. Saito et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166039
136. Hiatus of wetland methane emissions associated with recent La Niña episodes in the Asian monsoon region X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05219-0
137. Global carbon budget 2014 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-47-2015
138. Emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) from soil surfaces and their historical changes in East Asia: a model-based assessment A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0215-4
139. Large XCH4 anomaly in summer 2013 over northeast Asia observed by GOSAT M. Ishizawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9149-2016
140. Disentangling climatic and anthropogenic controls on global terrestrial evapotranspiration trends J. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094008
141. Role of OH variability in the stalling of the global atmospheric CH4 growth rate from 1999 to 2006 J. McNorton et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7943-2016
142. Global Carbon Budget 2020 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020
143. WETCHIMP-WSL: intercomparison of wetland methane emissions models over West Siberia T. Bohn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3321-2015
144. Process-based modelling of the methane balance in periglacial landscapes (JSBACH-methane) S. Kaiser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-333-2017
145. Evapotranspiration simulations in ISIMIP2a—Evaluation of spatio-temporal characteristics with a comprehensive ensemble of independent datasets R. Wartenburger et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4bb
146. Global Carbon Budget 2024 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025
147. Spatio-temporal variations of the atmospheric greenhouse gases and their sources and sinks in the Arctic region S. Morimoto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2020.100553
148. A model-based comparison of paleo-physical processes in the Bay of Bengal M. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-024-02165-2
149. Seasonal variability of tropical wetland CH4 emissions: the role of the methanogen-available carbon pool A. Bloom et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2821-2012
150. Genomic and phenotypic differentiation among Methanosarcina mazei populations from Columbia River sediment N. Youngblut et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.31
151. Multi-observational estimation of regional and sectoral emission contributions to the persistent high growth rate of atmospheric CH4 for 2020–2022 Y. Niwa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6757-2025
152. Accounting for Methane Dynamics in the Upper Yangtze River Valley Dammed Reservoir in China: A Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Approach Q. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4048896
153. Global Carbon Budget 2019 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
154. Global termite methane emissions have been affected by climate and land-use changes A. Ito https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44529-1
155. Methane Emissions from Wetlands on the Tibetan Plateau over the Past 40 Years T. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17162491
156. Will a Transition to Timber Construction Cool the Climate? G. Churkina & A. Organschi https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074271
157. Satellite-Based Monitoring of Methane Emissions from China’s Rice Hub R. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c09822
158. Economic and ecological importance of termites: A global review S. Govorushko https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12328
159. Lessons learned from more than a decade of greenhouse gas flux measurements at boreal forests in eastern Siberia and interior Alaska T. Hiyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2020.100607
160. MATHEMATICAL MODELS OF METHANE CONSUMPTION BY SOILS: A REVIEW M. Glagolev et al. https://doi.org/10.18822/edgcc622937
161. A cool-temperate young larch plantation as a net methane source - A 4-year continuous hyperbolic relaxed eddy accumulation and chamber measurements M. Ueyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.025
162. Methane emission from pan-Arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901–2016 A. Ito https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.12.001
163. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO 2 sink A. Ahlström et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1668
164. Methane budget estimates in Finland from the CarbonTracker Europe-CH₄ data assimilation system A. Tsuruta et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2018.1565030
165. Modelling of the wetland methane budget to estimate its transport to groundwater M. Glagolev et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1093/1/012017
166. Warm and wet spring compensated for the reduction in carbon sinks due to an extreme summer heatwave-drought event in 2022 in southern China Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111060
167. Estimating Trends and Variation of Net Biome Productivity in India for 1980–2012 Using a Land Surface Model S. Gahlot et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075777
168. Interconnected hydroclimatic shifts in Northern Eurasia: decadal variability and the impact of Arctic change Y. Iijima et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-026-00803-0
169. High-precision measurements of the methane flux over a larch forest based on a hyperbolic relaxed eddy accumulation method using a laser spectrometer M. Ueyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.029
170. Seasonal and interannual variability in wetland methane emissions simulated by CLM4Me' and CAM-chem and comparisons to observations of concentrations L. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4029-2015
171. Effects of water vapor dilution on trace gas flux, and practical correction methods Y. HARAZONO et al. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-14-00003
172. Enhanced regional terrestrial carbon uptake over Korea revealed by atmospheric CO2 measurements from 1999 to 2017 J. Yun et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15061
173. CH4 exchanges of the natural ecosystems in China during the past three decades: The role of wetland extent and its dynamics D. Wei & X. Wang https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003418
174. Atmospheric observations suggest methane emissions in north-eastern China growing with natural gas use F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19462-4