the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Comparing solubility algorithms of greenhouse gases in Earth-System modelling
Abstract. Accurate solubility estimates are fundamental for (i) Earth-System models forecasting the climate change taking into consideration the atmosphere–ocean balances and trades of greenhouse gases, and (ii) using field data to calibrate and validate the algorithms simulating those trades. We found important differences between the formulation generally accepted and a recently proposed alternative relying on a different chemistry background. First, we tested with field data from the Baltic Sea, which also enabled finding differences between using water temperatures measured at 0.5 or 4 m depths. Then, we used data simulated by atmospheric (Meteodata application of WRF) and oceanographic (WW3-NEMO) models of the European Coastal Ocean and Mediterranean to compare the use of the two solubility algorithms in Earth-System modelling. The mismatches between both formulations lead to a difference of millions of tons of CO2, and hundreds of tons of CH4 and N2O, dissolved in the first meter below the sea surface of the whole modelled region.
- Preprint
(1485 KB) - Metadata XML
- Companion paper
-
Supplement
(5133 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
-
RC C6316: 'Comparing solubility algorithms by Vieira et al.', Rik Wanninkhof, 08 Oct 2015
- AC C6616: 'Reply to reviewer', Vasco Vieira, 16 Oct 2015
- AC C8510: 'Reply to reviewer 1', Vasco Vieira, 15 Dec 2015
-
RC C7598: 'Vieira et al (2)', Martin Johnson, 11 Nov 2015
-
AC C8514: 'Reply to reviewer 2', Vasco Vieira, 15 Dec 2015
-
RC C8521: 'An independent review', Martin Johnson, 16 Dec 2015
- SC C8532: 'acknowledge the clarification', Vasco Vieira, 16 Dec 2015
-
RC C8521: 'An independent review', Martin Johnson, 16 Dec 2015
-
AC C8514: 'Reply to reviewer 2', Vasco Vieira, 15 Dec 2015
- EC C8601: 'Editorial decision and additional reply by Reviewer 2', Fortunat Joos, 21 Dec 2015
-
RC C6316: 'Comparing solubility algorithms by Vieira et al.', Rik Wanninkhof, 08 Oct 2015
- AC C6616: 'Reply to reviewer', Vasco Vieira, 16 Oct 2015
- AC C8510: 'Reply to reviewer 1', Vasco Vieira, 15 Dec 2015
-
RC C7598: 'Vieira et al (2)', Martin Johnson, 11 Nov 2015
-
AC C8514: 'Reply to reviewer 2', Vasco Vieira, 15 Dec 2015
-
RC C8521: 'An independent review', Martin Johnson, 16 Dec 2015
- SC C8532: 'acknowledge the clarification', Vasco Vieira, 16 Dec 2015
-
RC C8521: 'An independent review', Martin Johnson, 16 Dec 2015
-
AC C8514: 'Reply to reviewer 2', Vasco Vieira, 15 Dec 2015
- EC C8601: 'Editorial decision and additional reply by Reviewer 2', Fortunat Joos, 21 Dec 2015
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,050 | 274 | 70 | 1,394 | 178 | 53 | 66 |
- HTML: 1,050
- PDF: 274
- XML: 70
- Total: 1,394
- Supplement: 178
- BibTeX: 53
- EndNote: 66