Status: this preprint was under review for the journal BG. A revision for further review has not been submitted.
Mapping landscape scale variations of forest structure, biomass, and productivity in Amazonia
S. Saatchi,Y. Malhi,B. Zutta,W. Buermann,L. O. Anderson,A. M. Araujo,O. L. Phillips,J. Peacock,H. ter Steege,G. Lopez Gonzalez,T. Baker,L. Arroyo,S. Almeida,N. Higuchi,T. Killeen,A. Monteagudo,D. Neill,N. Pitman,A. Prieto,R. Salomão,N. Silva,R. Vásquez Martínez,W. Laurance,and H. A. Ramírez
Abstract. Landscape and environmental variables such as topography, geomorphology, soil types, and climate are important factors affecting forest composition, structure, productivity, and biomass. Here, we combine a network of forest inventories with recently developed global data products from satellite observations in modeling the potential distributions of forest structure and productivity in Amazonia and examine how geomorphology, soil, and precipitation control these distributions. We use the RAINFOR network of forest plots distributed in lowland forests across Amazonia, and satellite observations of tree cover, leaf area index, phenology, moisture, and topographical variations. A maximum entropy estimation (Maxent) model is employed to predict the spatial distribution of several key forest structure parameters: basal area, fraction of large trees, fraction of palms, wood density, productivity, and above-ground biomass at 5 km spatial resolution. A series of statistical tests at selected thresholds as well as across all thresholds and jackknife analysis are used to examine the accuracy of distribution maps and the relative contributions of environmental variables. The final maps were interpreted using soil, precipitation, and geomorphological features of Amazonia and it was found that the length of dry season played a key role in impacting the distribution of all forest variables except the wood density. Soil type had a significant impact on the wood productivity. Most high productivity forests were distributed either on less infertile soils of western Amazonia and Andean foothills, on crystalline shields, and younger alluvial deposits. Areas of low elevation and high density of small rivers of Central Amazonia showed distinct features, hosting mainly forests with low productivity and smaller trees.
Received: 19 Dec 2008 – Discussion started: 04 Jun 2009
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
S. Saatchi,Y. Malhi,B. Zutta,W. Buermann,L. O. Anderson,A. M. Araujo,O. L. Phillips,J. Peacock,H. ter Steege,G. Lopez Gonzalez,T. Baker,L. Arroyo,S. Almeida,N. Higuchi,T. Killeen,A. Monteagudo,D. Neill,N. Pitman,A. Prieto,R. Salomão,N. Silva,R. Vásquez Martínez,W. Laurance,and H. A. Ramírez
RC S1289: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Aug 2009
S. Saatchi,Y. Malhi,B. Zutta,W. Buermann,L. O. Anderson,A. M. Araujo,O. L. Phillips,J. Peacock,H. ter Steege,G. Lopez Gonzalez,T. Baker,L. Arroyo,S. Almeida,N. Higuchi,T. Killeen,A. Monteagudo,D. Neill,N. Pitman,A. Prieto,R. Salomão,N. Silva,R. Vásquez Martínez,W. Laurance,and H. A. Ramírez
S. Saatchi,Y. Malhi,B. Zutta,W. Buermann,L. O. Anderson,A. M. Araujo,O. L. Phillips,J. Peacock,H. ter Steege,G. Lopez Gonzalez,T. Baker,L. Arroyo,S. Almeida,N. Higuchi,T. Killeen,A. Monteagudo,D. Neill,N. Pitman,A. Prieto,R. Salomão,N. Silva,R. Vásquez Martínez,W. Laurance,and H. A. Ramírez
Viewed
Total article views: 3,830 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,823
1,920
87
3,830
83
96
HTML: 1,823
PDF: 1,920
XML: 87
Total: 3,830
BibTeX: 83
EndNote: 96
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Latest update: 08 Nov 2025
S. Saatchi
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Y. Malhi
Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK
B. Zutta
Institute of Environment, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
W. Buermann
Institute of Environment, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
L. O. Anderson
Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK
A. M. Araujo
Museo Noel Kempff Mercado, Santa Cruz, Bolivia
O. L. Phillips
Earth and Biosphere Institute, School of Geography, Univ. of Leeds, UK
J. Peacock
Earth and Biosphere Institute, School of Geography, Univ. of Leeds, UK
H. ter Steege
Department of Plant Ecology and Biodiversity, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
G. Lopez Gonzalez
Earth and Biosphere Institute, School of Geography, Univ. of Leeds, UK
T. Baker
Earth and Biosphere Institute, School of Geography, Univ. of Leeds, UK
L. Arroyo
Museo Noel Kempff Mercado, Santa Cruz, Bolivia
S. Almeida
Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belem, Brazil
N. Higuchi
Instituto National de Pesquisas Amazônicas, Manaus, Brazil
T. Killeen
Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, Washington, DC, USA
A. Monteagudo
Herbario Vargas, Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Cusco, Peru
D. Neill
Herbario Nacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador
N. Pitman
Center for Tropical Conservation, Duke University, Durham, USA
A. Prieto
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Colombia
R. Salomão
Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belem, Brazil
N. Silva
CIFOR, Tapajos, Brazil
R. Vásquez Martínez
Herbario Vargas, Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Cusco, Peru