Articles | Volume 10, issue 7
Biogeosciences, 10, 4927–4936, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4927-2013
Biogeosciences, 10, 4927–4936, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4927-2013

Technical note 22 Jul 2013

Technical note | 22 Jul 2013

Technical Note: Comparison of storage strategies of sea surface microlayer samples

K. Schneider-Zapp1, M. E. Salter2, P. J. Mann3, and R. C. Upstill-Goddard1 K. Schneider-Zapp et al.
  • 1Ocean Research Group, School of Marine Science and Technology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
  • 2Department of Applied Environmental Science (ITM), Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 8, 11418 Stockholm, Sweden
  • 3Woods Hole Research Center, 149 Woods Hole Road, Falmouth, MA, USA

Abstract. The sea surface microlayer (SML) is an important biogeochemical system whose physico-chemical analysis often necessitates some degree of sample storage. However, many SML components degrade with time so the development of optimal storage protocols is paramount. We here briefly review some commonly used treatment and storage protocols. Using freshwater and saline SML samples from a river estuary, we investigated temporal changes in surfactant activity (SA) and the absorbance and fluorescence of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) over four weeks, following selected sample treatment and storage protocols. Some variability in the effectiveness of individual protocols most likely reflects sample provenance. None of the various protocols examined performed any better than dark storage at 4 °C without pre-treatment. We therefore recommend storing samples refrigerated in the dark.

Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint