43 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Declining coccolithophore blooms in the North Atlantic and Western Barents Sea G. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adw5268
2. Coccolithophore responses to environmental variability in the South China Sea: species composition and calcite content X. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4843-2016
3. Effect of Light, Temperature, and Nutrient Deficiency on Structural and Functional Characteristics of the Coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (Prymnesiophyceae) L. Stelmakh & O. Alatartseva https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082925601017
4. Over-calcified forms of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi in high-CO2 waters are not preadapted to ocean acidification P. von Dassow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1515-2018
5. Phytoplankton defenses: Do Emiliania huxleyi coccoliths protect against microzooplankton predators? S. Strom et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10655
6. Reduced growth with increased quotas of particulate organic and inorganic carbon in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi under future ocean climate change conditions Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6357-2020
7. Temperature Induced Physiological Reaction Norms of the Coccolithophore Gephyrocapsa oceanica and Resulting Coccolith Sr/Ca and Mg/Ca Ratios M. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.582521
8. Resilience of Emiliania huxleyi to future changes in subantarctic waters E. Armstrong et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284415
9. Lipid biomarker production by marine phytoplankton under different nutrient and temperature regimes Y. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2019.01.008
10. Strain-specific morphological response of the dominant calcifying phytoplankton species Emiliania huxleyi to salinity change C. Gebühr et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246745
11. Nutritional response of a coccolithophore to changing pH and temperature R. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12204
12. Coccolithophore Distribution in the Western Black Sea in the Summer of 2016 M. Dimiza et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15121194
13. Individual and interactive effects of ocean acidification, global warming, and UV radiation on phytoplankton K. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1329-6
14. How will the key marine calcifier Emiliania huxleyi respond to a warmer and more thermally variable ocean? X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4393-2019
15. Meta-analysis reveals responses of coccolithophores and diatoms to warming J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.106275
16. Phosphorus limitation and heat stress decrease calcification in Emiliania huxleyi A. Gerecht et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-833-2018
17. Temperature effects on sinking velocity of different Emiliania huxleyi strains A. Rosas-Navarro et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194386
18. Emiliania huxleyi coccolith calcite mass modulation by morphological changes and ecology in the Mediterranean Sea B. D’Amario et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201161
19. A 15-million-year-long record of phenotypic evolution in the heavily calcified coccolithophore Helicosphaera and its biogeochemical implications L. Šupraha & J. Henderiks https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2955-2020
20. Structural and functional parameters of the Black Sea phytoplankton during the summer bloom of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi L. Stelmakh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103594
21. Morphology, phylogenetic position, and ecophysiological features of the coccolithophore Chrysotila dentata (Prymnesiophyceae) isolated from the Bohai Sea, China H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00318884.2019.1644477
22. Coccolithophore community response to ocean acidification and warming in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea: results from a mesocosm experiment B. D’Amario et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69519-5
23. Environmental Drivers of Coccolithophore Growth in the Pacific Sector of the Southern Ocean H. Oliver et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007751
24. Short-term response of Emiliania huxleyi growth and morphology to abrupt salinity stress R. Sheward et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3121-2024
25. Coccolithophore growth and calcification in a changing ocean K. Krumhardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.10.007
26. Intraspecific Diversity in Thermal Performance Determines Phytoplankton Ecological Niche A. Krinos et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70055
27. The cellular response to ocean warming in Emiliania huxleyi C. Dedman et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1177349
28. Climate change, tropical fisheries and prospects for sustainable development V. Lam et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0071-9
29. A New Approach to Estimating Coccolithophore Calcification Rates From Space J. Hopkins & W. Balch https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004235
30. Can morphological features of coccolithophores serve as a reliable proxy to reconstruct environmental conditions of the past? G. Faucher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1007-2020
31. Effects of Temperature and Light on Methane Production of Widespread Marine Phytoplankton T. Klintzsch et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005793
32. Calcification moderates the biochemical responses of Gephyrocapsa oceanica to ocean acidification X. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2021.2016841
33. Exposure to oil from the 2015 Refugio spill alters the physiology of a common harmful algal bloom species, Pseudo-nitzschia australis, and the ubiquitous coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi T. Ladd et al. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12710
34. Stable isotope fractionation of strontium in coccolithophore calcite: Influence of temperature and carbonate chemistry M. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12276
35. Ocean acidification affects physiology of coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi and weakens its mechanical resistance to copepods H. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.106232
36. Effect of environmental parameters on growth and calcification in marine coccolithophore Gephyrocapsa huxleyi CCMP371 N. Mazumdar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2026.134576
37. The Effect of cytoskeleton inhibitors on coccolith morphology in Coccolithus braarudii and Scyphosphaera apsteinii G. Langer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.13303
38. Rapid diversification underlying the global dominance of a cosmopolitan phytoplankton E. Bendif et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01365-5
39. Simultaneous shifts in elemental stoichiometry and fatty acids of Emiliania huxleyi in response to environmental changes R. Bi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1029-2018
40. Biscutum constans coccolith size patterns across the mid Cretaceous in the western Tethys: Paleoecological implications C. Bottini & G. Faucher https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109852
41. Relationship between coccolith length and thickness in the coccolithophore species Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica S. Linge Johnsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220725
42. Refining the alkenone-pCO2 method II: Towards resolving the physiological parameter ‘b’ Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.05.002
43. Late Quaternary coccolith weight variations in the northern South China Sea and their environmental controls X. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2019.101798