Dear Dr. Bartsch,
thank you for your detailed response to reviewer 1.
1. Please consider to integrate these detailed explanations in the main manuscript text or supplement (if you think this is more feasible).
2. Can you please also address, the reviewer question regarding the use of the L-band and its correlation to map biomass? The reviewer #1 had stated: "What about using L band? Many studies have shown good correlations of L band with
vegetation biomass. If the C band better discerns wet and dry surface, than peatland
SOC stocks should be predicted better? See P5L18-21."

Regarding reviewer 2:
1. Please integrate your reply to the wider use of the carbon map in the discussion section.
2. Please integrate the corrections and explanations regarding the figures and corrected text in the manuscript.

The reason why I am asking for these things is that you did not indicate where you would implement each correction or explanation in the revised manuscript. If you do so accordingly, the revised text is ready for publication in my view.
Best wishes,
Kirsten Thonicke.