Articles | Volume 17, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5939-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5939-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Robust processing of airborne laser scans to plant area density profiles
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Julia Freier
Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology, Kassel, Germany
Ebba Dellwik
Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
Related authors
Hugo Olivares-Espinosa and Johan Arnqvist
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-114, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-114, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents an investigation into varying modelling choices for large eddy simulation over realistic forests. The focus is on how to represent the impact of upstream forest cover on the wind statistics. The work clearly demonstrates the advantage of using an explicit drag formulation together with forest density maps from airborne laser scans over using roughness length and displacement height, mainly because it leverages observable quantities and minimizes the impact uncertain choices.
Christoffer Hallgren, Johan Arnqvist, Erik Nilsson, Stefan Ivanell, Metodija Shapkalijevski, August Thomasson, Heidi Pettersson, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1183–1207, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1183-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1183-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Non-idealized wind profiles with negative shear in part of the profile (e.g., low-level jets) frequently occur in coastal environments and are important to take into consideration for offshore wind power. Using observations from a coastal site in the Baltic Sea, we analyze in which meteorological and sea state conditions these profiles occur and study how they alter the turbulence structure of the boundary layer compared to idealized profiles.
Hugo Olivares-Espinosa and Johan Arnqvist
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-114, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-114, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents an investigation into varying modelling choices for large eddy simulation over realistic forests. The focus is on how to represent the impact of upstream forest cover on the wind statistics. The work clearly demonstrates the advantage of using an explicit drag formulation together with forest density maps from airborne laser scans over using roughness length and displacement height, mainly because it leverages observable quantities and minimizes the impact uncertain choices.
Christoffer Hallgren, Johan Arnqvist, Erik Nilsson, Stefan Ivanell, Metodija Shapkalijevski, August Thomasson, Heidi Pettersson, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1183–1207, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1183-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1183-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Non-idealized wind profiles with negative shear in part of the profile (e.g., low-level jets) frequently occur in coastal environments and are important to take into consideration for offshore wind power. Using observations from a coastal site in the Baltic Sea, we analyze in which meteorological and sea state conditions these profiles occur and study how they alter the turbulence structure of the boundary layer compared to idealized profiles.
Nikolas Angelou, Jakob Mann, and Ebba Dellwik
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2255–2268, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2255-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2255-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we use state-of-the-art scanning wind lidars to investigate the wind field in the near-wake region of a mature, open-grown tree. Our measurements provide for the first time a picture of the mean and the turbulent spatial fluctuations in the flow in the wake of a tree in its natural environment. Our observations support the hypothesis that even simple models can realistically simulate the turbulent fluctuations in the wake and thus predict the effect of trees in flow models.
Toby D. Jackson, Sarab Sethi, Ebba Dellwik, Nikolas Angelou, Amanda Bunce, Tim van Emmerik, Marine Duperat, Jean-Claude Ruel, Axel Wellpott, Skip Van Bloem, Alexis Achim, Brian Kane, Dominick M. Ciruzzi, Steven P. Loheide II, Ken James, Daniel Burcham, John Moore, Dirk Schindler, Sven Kolbe, Kilian Wiegmann, Mark Rudnicki, Victor J. Lieffers, John Selker, Andrew V. Gougherty, Tim Newson, Andrew Koeser, Jason Miesbauer, Roger Samelson, Jim Wagner, Anthony R. Ambrose, Andreas Detter, Steffen Rust, David Coomes, and Barry Gardiner
Biogeosciences, 18, 4059–4072, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4059-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4059-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We have all seen trees swaying in the wind, but did you know that this motion can teach us about ecology? We summarized tree motion data from many different studies and looked for similarities between trees. We found that the motion of trees in conifer forests is quite similar to each other, whereas open-grown trees and broadleaf forests show more variation. It has been suggested that additional damping or amplification of tree motion occurs at high wind speeds, but we found no evidence of this.
Cited articles
Almeida, D. R. A. d., Stark, S. C., Shao, G., Schietti, J., Nelson,
B. W., Silva, C. A., Gorgens, E. B., Valbuena, R., Papa, D. d. A.,
and Brancalion, P. H. S.: Optimizing the Remote Detection of Tropical
Rainforest Structure with Airborne Lidar: Leaf Area Profile Sensitivity to
Pulse Density and Spatial Sampling, Remote Sensing, 11, 92,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11010092, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j
Arnqvist, J.: ALS2PAD software, GitHub repository, available at:
https://github.com/johanarnqvist/ALS2PAD, last access: 27 November 2020. a
ASPRS: LAS SPECIFICATION Version 1.4 – R13, Tech. rep., American Society for
Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, available at:
https://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/LAS_1_4_r13.pdf (last access: 27 November 2020),
2013. a
Blair, J. B. and Hofton, M. A.: Modeling laser altimeter return waveforms over
complex vegetation using high-resolution elevation data, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 26, 2509–2512, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010484,
1999. a
Boudreault, L. É., Bechmann, A., Tarvainen, L., Klemedtsson, L.,
Shendryk, I., and Dellwik, E.: A LiDAR method of canopy structure retrieval
for wind modeling of heterogeneous forests, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 201, 86–97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.10.014, 2015. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j
Bréda, N. J. J.: Ground based measurements of leaf area index: a review of
methods, instruments and current controversies, J. Exp.
Bot., 54, 2403–2417, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg263, 2003. a, b, c, d
Dellwik, E., Bingöl, F., and Mann, J.: Flow distortion at a dense forest
edge, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 676–686,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2155, 2014. a, b, c, d
Detto, M., Asner, G. P., Muller-Landau, H. C., and Sonnentag, O.: Spatial
variability in tropical forest leaf area density from multireturn lidar and
modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 120, 294–309,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002774,
2015. a
Gielen, B., Acosta, M., Altimir, N., Buchmann, N., Cescatti, A., Ceschia, E.,
Fleck, S., Hörtnagl, L., Klumpp, K., Kolari, P., Lohila, A., Loustau, D.,
Marañon-Jimenez, S., Manise, T., Matteucci, G., Merbold, L., Metzger, C.,
Moureaux, C., Montagnani, L., Nilsson, M. B., Osborne, B., Papale, D.,
Pavelka, M., Saunders, M., Simioni, G., Soudani, K., Sonnentag, O., Tallec,
T., Tuittila, E.-S., Peichl, M., Pokorny, R., Vincke, C., and Wohlfahrt, G.:
Ancillary vegetation measurements at ICOS ecosystem stations, Int.
Agrophys., 32, 645–664, https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2017-0048, 2018. a
Ivanell, S., Arnqvist, J., Avila, M., Cavar, D., Chavez-Arroyo, R. A., Olivares-Espinosa, H., Peralta, C., Adib, J., and Witha, B.: Micro-scale model comparison (benchmark) at the moderately complex forested site Ryningsnäs, Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 929–946, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-929-2018, 2018. a, b
Monsi, M. and Saeki, T.: On the factor light in plant communities and its
importance for matter production, Ann. Bot., 95, 549–567,
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci052, 2005. a, b
Patton, E. G., Sullivan, P. P., Shaw, R. H., Finnigan, J. J., and Weil, J. C.:
Atmospheric Stability Influences on Coupled Boundary Layer and Canopy
Turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 1621–1647,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0068.1, 2016. a
Popescu, S. C., Zhao, K., Neuenschwander, A., and Lin, C.: Satellite lidar vs.
small footprint airborne lidar: Comparing the accuracy of aboveground biomass
estimates and forest structure metrics at footprint level, Remote Sens.
Environ., 115, 2786–2797,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.01.026, 2011.
a
Smallman, T. L., Moncrieff, J. B., and Williams, M.: WRFv3.2-SPAv2: development and validation of a coupled ecosystem–atmosphere model, scaling from surface fluxes of CO2 and energy to atmospheric profiles, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1079–1093, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1079-2013, 2013. a
Sogachev, A., Menzhulin, G. V., Heimann, M., and Lloyd, J.: A simple
three-dimensional canopy – planetary boundary layer simulation model for
scalar concentrations and fluxes, Tellus B, 54, 784–819,
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.2002.201353.x,
2002. a
Vincent, G., Antin, C., Laurans, M., Heurtebize, J., Durrieu, S., Lavalley, C.,
and Dauzat, J.: Mapping plant area index of tropical evergreen forest by
airborne laser scanning. A cross-validation study using LAI2200 optical
sensor, Remote Sens. Environ., 198, 254–266,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.05.034,
2017. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Wagner, W., Hollaus, M., Briese, C., and Ducic, V.: 3D vegetation mapping using
small-footprint full-waveform airborne laser scanners, Int.
J. Remote Sens., 29, 1433–1452, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701736398,
2008. a
Williams, M., Rastetter, E. B., Fernandes, D. N., Goulden, M. L., Wofsy, S. C.,
Shaver, G. R., Melillo, J. M., Munger, J. W., Fan, S.-M., and Nadelhoffer,
K. J.: Modelling the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in a Quercus – Acer
stand at Harvard Forest: the regulation of stomatal conductance by light,
nitrogen and soil/plant hydraulic properties, Plant Cell Environ., 19,
911–927, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00456.x,
1996. a
Yan, G., Hu, R., Luo, J., Weiss, M., Jiang, H., Mu, X., Xie, D., and Zhang, W.:
Review of indirect optical measurements of leaf area index: Recent advances,
challenges, and perspectives, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 265, 390–411, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.033,
2019. a, b, c
Short summary
Data generated by airborne laser scans enable the characterization of surface vegetation for any application that might need it, such as forest management, modeling for numerical weather prediction, or wind energy estimation. In this work we present a new algorithm for calculating the vegetation density using data from airborne laser scans. The new routine is more robust than earlier methods, and an implementation in popular programming languages accompanies the article to support new users.
Data generated by airborne laser scans enable the characterization of surface vegetation for any...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint