Articles | Volume 18, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2727-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2727-2021
Research article
 | 
30 Apr 2021
Research article |  | 30 Apr 2021

Optimal model complexity for terrestrial carbon cycle prediction

Caroline A. Famiglietti, T. Luke Smallman, Paul A. Levine, Sophie Flack-Prain, Gregory R. Quetin, Victoria Meyer, Nicholas C. Parazoo, Stephanie G. Stettz, Yan Yang, Damien Bonal, A. Anthony Bloom, Mathew Williams, and Alexandra G. Konings

Viewed

Total article views: 3,747 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,569 1,130 48 3,747 264 56 74
  • HTML: 2,569
  • PDF: 1,130
  • XML: 48
  • Total: 3,747
  • Supplement: 264
  • BibTeX: 56
  • EndNote: 74
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Dec 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Dec 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,747 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,490 with geography defined and 257 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Model uncertainty dominates the spread in terrestrial carbon cycle predictions. Efforts to reduce it typically involve adding processes, thereby increasing model complexity. However, if and how model performance scales with complexity is unclear. Using a suite of 16 structurally distinct carbon cycle models, we find that increased complexity only improves skill if parameters are adequately informed. Otherwise, it can degrade skill, and an intermediate-complexity model is optimal.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint