Articles | Volume 18, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2727-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2727-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
30 Apr 2021
Research article |
| 30 Apr 2021
| 30 Apr 2021
Optimal model complexity for terrestrial carbon cycle prediction
Caroline A. Famiglietti
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
T. Luke Smallman
School of GeoSciences and National Centre for Earth Observation,
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Paul A. Levine
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, USA
Sophie Flack-Prain
School of GeoSciences and National Centre for Earth Observation,
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Gregory R. Quetin
Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
Victoria Meyer
Department of Liberal Arts, School of the Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, USA
Nicholas C. Parazoo
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, USA
Stephanie G. Stettz
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, USA
Yan Yang
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, USA
Damien Bonal
Université de Lorraine, AgroParisTech, INRAE, UMR Silva, 54000
Nancy, France
A. Anthony Bloom
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, USA
Mathew Williams
School of GeoSciences and National Centre for Earth Observation,
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Alexandra G. Konings
Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Erica L. McCormick, Lillian E. Sanders, Kaighin A. McColl, and Alexandra G. Konings
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 2417–2432, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2417-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2417-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We estimate daily evapotranspiration (ET) across the United States using the ‘surface flux equilibrium’ approach, which assumes that the balance of temperature and humidity in the atmosphere reflects recent ET on land. Using triple collocation, we compare our estimates to three other ET datasets and find that the surface flux equilibrium ET method performs well. Surface flux equilibrium ET may therefore be useful for hydrologic studies where simple, parameter-free ET estimates are advantageous.
Tim J. Green, David T. Milodowski, T. Luke Smallman, Annikki Mäkelä, and Mathew Williams
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2222, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2222, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Widely used satellite-based products of leaf area index (LAI) used in carbon cycle studies consistently show unrealistically high seasonality over northern evergreen needleleaf forests. This study uses a model-data fusion approach to show how these biases adversely affect carbon cycle model results by comparing outputs against a calibration that includes leaf lifespan data and summer-only LAI. Results highlight the urgent need for modelling studies and LAI producers to address these biases.
Andrew F. Feldman, William K. Smith, Alexandra G. Konings, Martin J. Baur, Marvin Browne, David Chaparro, Charles Devine, Jennifer L. Diehl, Arthur Endsley, Thomas Jagdhuber, Kristine M. Larson, Coral del Mar Valle-Rodriguez, Konstantin Schellenberg, Ruxandra-Maria Zotta, and Shawn P. Serbin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1759, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1759, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Vegetation water observations from 272 field-based GNSS sensors and satellite-based vegetation optical depth are compared across the western U.S. We find significant positive correlations across the sites and identify common conditions that increase the correlations including less forest cover, more homogeneous vegetation across landscapes, and large seasonal amplitudes. These field-based sensors are thus useful tools to evaluate grass and shrub water stress and validate satellite signals.
Nicholas Balasus, Daniel J. Jacob, A. Anthony Bloom, James D. East, Lucas A. Estrada, Sarah E. Hancock, Megan He, Todd A. Mooring, Alexander J. Turner, and John R. Worden
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 4601–4617, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4601-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4601-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We use satellite observations of methane to determine the amount of methane coming from Africa and relate this to the physical processes responsible, with relevance for climate change given methane's potency as a greenhouse gas. We find that the amount of methane coming from Africa has increased by a third across 2019–2024, driven primarily by steady increases in emissions from livestock, in addition to irregular surges from wetlands.
Raphaël Savelli, Dustin Carroll, Dimitris Menemenlis, Jonathan M. Lauderdale, Clément Bertin, Stephanie Dutkiewicz, Manfredi Manizza, A. Anthony Bloom, Karel Castro-Morales, Charles E. Miller, Marc Simard, Kevin W. Bowman, and Hong Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 867–885, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-867-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-867-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Accounting for carbon and nutrients in rivers is essential for resolving carbon dioxide (CO2) exchanges between the ocean and the atmosphere. In this study, we add the effect of present-day rivers to a pioneering global-ocean biogeochemistry model. This study highlights the challenge for global ocean numerical models to cover the complexity of the flow of water and carbon across the Land-to-Ocean Aquatic Continuum.
Rebecca M. Varney, Daniel Hooke, Norman J. Steinert, T. Luke Smallman, Camilla Mathison, and Eleanor J. Burke
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6075, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6075, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The northern high latitudes mitigate climate change by land ecosystems absorbing more carbon from the atmosphere than they release. This carbon sink is sensitive to long-term CO2 emissions. Here, we use a probabilistic framework to quantify the timing and magnitude of a transition to a carbon source in different future emission scenarios, including overshoot. The fate of this region is dependent on the balance between carbon loss from permafrost and gain from increased vegetation productivity.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Hongmei Li, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Kjetil Aas, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Nicolas Bellouin, Alice Benoit-Cattin, Carla F. Berghoff, Raffaele Bernardello, Laurent Bopp, Ida B. M. Brasika, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Nathan O. Collier, Thomas H. Colligan, Margot Cronin, Laique Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Matt P. Enright, Kazutaka Enyo, Michael Erb, Wiley Evans, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Filippa Fransner, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Jefferson Goncalves De Souza, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Bertrand Guenet, Özgür Gürses, Kirsty Harrington, Ian Harris, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Akihiko Ito, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Steve D. Jones, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Yawen Kong, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Charles Koven, Taro Kunimitsu, Xin Lan, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Zhu Liu, Claire Lo Monaco, Lei Ma, Gregg Marland, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Joe Melton, Natalie Monacci, Erwan Monier, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Jens D. Müller, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Lorna R. Nayagam, Yosuke Niwa, Tobias Nutzel, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Naiqing Pan, Sudhanshu Pandey, Denis Pierrot, Zhangcai Qin, Pierre A. G. Regnier, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Ingunn Skjelvan, T. Luke Smallman, Victoria Spada, Mohanan G. Sreeush, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Didier Swingedouw, Roland Séférian, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Hanqin Tian, Xiangjun Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Erik van Ooijen, Guido van der Werf, Sebastiaan J. van de Velde, Anthony Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-659, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-659, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2025 describes the methodology, main results, and datasets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2025). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Liang Feng, Paul I. Palmer, Luke Smallman, Jingfeng Xiao, Paolo Cristofanelli, Ove Hermansen, John Lee, Casper Labuschagne, Simonetta Montaguti, Steffen M. Noe, Stephen M. Platt, Xinrong Ren, Martin Steinbacher, and Irène Xueref-Remy
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 13053–13076, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13053-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13053-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The year 2023 saw unexpectedly large global atmospheric CO2 growth. Satellite data reveal a role for increased tropical emissions. Larger emissions over eastern Brazil can be explained by warmer temperatures, which has led to exceptional drought, while hydrological changes play more of a role in emission increases elsewhere in the tropics. Broadly, we find that this situation continues into 2024.
Meng Zhao, Erica L. McCormick, Geruo A, Alexandra G. Konings, and Bailing Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2293–2307, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2293-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2293-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Root-zone water storage capacity (Sr) helps plants survive droughts and influences water and climate systems. Using GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) satellite data, we estimated Sr globally and found that it exceeds 2 m soil storage in nearly half of the vegetated areas, far more than previously thought. Incorporating our Sr estimates into a global hydrological model improves evapotranspiration simulations, particularly during droughts, highlighting the value of our approach for advancing water resource and ecosystem modeling.
Russell Doughty, Michael C. Wimberly, Dan Wanyama, Helene Peiro, Nicholas Parazoo, Sean Crowell, and Moses Azong Cho
Biogeosciences, 22, 1985–2004, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1985-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1985-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We find West African solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) increases during the dry season and peaks before precipitation, similar to the Amazon. In central Africa, a continental-scale bimodal SIF seasonality appears; its minimum aligns with precipitation, but its maximum seems less environmentally driven. Notably, differences between SIF and vegetation index (VI) seasonality indicate VI-based photosynthesis estimates may be inaccurate.
Wolfgang Knorr, Matthew Williams, Tea Thum, Thomas Kaminski, Michael Voßbeck, Marko Scholze, Tristan Quaife, T. Luke Smallman, Susan C. Steele-Dunne, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Tim Green, Sönke Zaehle, Mika Aurela, Alexandre Bouvet, Emanuel Bueechi, Wouter Dorigo, Tarek S. El-Madany, Mirco Migliavacca, Marika Honkanen, Yann H. Kerr, Anna Kontu, Juha Lemmetyinen, Hannakaisa Lindqvist, Arnaud Mialon, Tuuli Miinalainen, Gaétan Pique, Amanda Ojasalo, Shaun Quegan, Peter J. Rayner, Pablo Reyes-Muñoz, Nemesio Rodríguez-Fernández, Mike Schwank, Jochem Verrelst, Songyan Zhu, Dirk Schüttemeyer, and Matthias Drusch
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2137–2159, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2137-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2137-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
When it comes to climate change, the land surface is where the vast majority of impacts happen. The task of monitoring those impacts across the globe is formidable and must necessarily rely on satellites – at a significant cost: the measurements are only indirect and require comprehensive physical understanding. We have created a comprehensive modelling system that we offer to the research community to explore how satellite data can be better exploited to help us capture the changes that happen on our lands.
Mathew Williams, David T. Milodowski, T. Luke Smallman, Kyle G. Dexter, Gabi C. Hegerl, Iain M. McNicol, Michael O'Sullivan, Carla M. Roesch, Casey M. Ryan, Stephen Sitch, and Aude Valade
Biogeosciences, 22, 1597–1614, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1597-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1597-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Southern African woodlands are important in both regional and global carbon cycles. A new carbon analysis created by combining satellite data with ecosystem modelling shows that the region has a neutral C balance overall but with important spatial variations. Patterns of biomass and C balance across the region are the outcome of climate controls on production and vegetation–fire interactions, which determine the mortality of vegetation and spatial variations in vegetation function.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Hongmei Li, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Carla F. Berghoff, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Patricia Cadule, Katie Campbell, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Thomas Colligan, Jeanne Decayeux, Laique M. Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Carolina Duran Rojas, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Amanda R. Fay, Richard A. Feely, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Xin Lan, Siv K. Lauvset, Nathalie Lefèvre, Zhu Liu, Junjie Liu, Lei Ma, Shamil Maksyutov, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie M. Monacci, Eric J. Morgan, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Craig Neill, Yosuke Niwa, Tobias Nützel, Lea Olivier, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Denis Pierrot, Zhangcai Qin, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Roland Séférian, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Olivier Torres, Etienne Tourigny, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido van der Werf, Rik Wanninkhof, Xuhui Wang, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Zhen Yu, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Ning Zeng, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 965–1039, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2024 describes the methodology, main results, and datasets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2024). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Marcos B. Sanches, Manoel Cardoso, Celso von Randow, Chris Jones, and Mathew Williams
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-942, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-942, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines South America's role in the global carbon cycle using flux and stock analyses from CMIP6 Earth System Models. We discuss the continent’s relevance, model-observation agreement, and the impacts of dry and wet years on major biomes. Additionally, we assess model results indicating that parts of South America could shift from carbon sinks to emitters, significantly affecting the global carbon balance.
Xiaoran Zhu, Dong Chen, Maruko Kogure, Elizabeth Hoy, Logan T. Berner, Amy L. Breen, Abhishek Chatterjee, Scott J. Davidson, Gerald V. Frost, Teresa N. Hollingsworth, Go Iwahana, Randi R. Jandt, Anja N. Kade, Tatiana V. Loboda, Matt J. Macander, Michelle Mack, Charles E. Miller, Eric A. Miller, Susan M. Natali, Martha K. Raynolds, Adrian V. Rocha, Shiro Tsuyuzaki, Craig E. Tweedie, Donald A. Walker, Mathew Williams, Xin Xu, Yingtong Zhang, Nancy French, and Scott Goetz
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3687–3703, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3687-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3687-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Arctic tundra is experiencing widespread physical and biological changes, largely in response to warming, yet scientific understanding of tundra ecology and change remains limited due to relatively limited accessibility and studies compared to other terrestrial biomes. To support synthesis research and inform future studies, we created the Synthesized Alaskan Tundra Field Dataset (SATFiD), which brings together field datasets and includes vegetation, active-layer, and fire properties.
Hannah Nesser, Daniel J. Jacob, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Alba Lorente, Zichong Chen, Xiao Lu, Lu Shen, Zhen Qu, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Margaux Winter, Shuang Ma, A. Anthony Bloom, John R. Worden, Robert N. Stavins, and Cynthia A. Randles
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5069–5091, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5069-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5069-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We quantify 2019 methane emissions in the contiguous US (CONUS) at a ≈ 25 km × 25 km resolution using satellite methane observations. We find a 13 % upward correction to the 2023 US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory (GHGI) for 2019, with large corrections to individual states, urban areas, and landfills. This may present a challenge for US climate policies and goals, many of which target significant reductions in methane emissions.
Russell Doughty, Yujie Wang, Jennifer Johnson, Nicholas Parazoo, Troy Magney, Zoe Pierrat, Xiangming Xiao, Luis Guanter, Philipp Köhler, Christian Frankenberg, Peter Somkuti, Shuang Ma, Yuanwei Qin, Sean Crowell, and Berrien Moore III
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.168167172.20799710/v1, https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.168167172.20799710/v1, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Here we present a novel model of global photosynthesis, ChloFluo, which uses spaceborne chlorophyll fluorescence to estimate the amount of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by chlorophyll. Potential uses of our model are to advance our understanding of the timing and magnitude of photosynthesis, its effect on atmospheric carbon dioxide fluxes, and vegetation response to climate events and change.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Bertrand Decharme, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Patricia Cadule, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Thi-Tuyet-Trang Chau, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Xinyu Dou, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Thomas Gasser, Josefine Ghattas, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Fortunat Joos, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Arne Körtzinger, Xin Lan, Nathalie Lefèvre, Hongmei Li, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Lei Ma, Greg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Gesa Meyer, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin M. O'Brien, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Tsuneo Ono, Melf Paulsen, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Carter M. Powis, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Erik van Ooijen, Rik Wanninkhof, Michio Watanabe, Cathy Wimart-Rousseau, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5301–5369, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2023 describes the methodology, main results, and data sets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2023). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Luana S. Basso, Chris Wilson, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Graciela Tejada, Henrique L. G. Cassol, Egídio Arai, Mathew Williams, T. Luke Smallman, Wouter Peters, Stijn Naus, John B. Miller, and Manuel Gloor
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 9685–9723, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9685-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9685-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Amazon’s carbon balance may have changed due to forest degradation, deforestation and warmer climate. We used an atmospheric model and atmospheric CO2 observations to quantify Amazonian carbon emissions (2010–2018). The region was a small carbon source to the atmosphere, mostly due to fire emissions. Forest uptake compensated for ~ 50 % of the fire emissions, meaning that the remaining forest is still a small carbon sink. We found no clear evidence of weakening carbon uptake over the period.
David T. Milodowski, T. Luke Smallman, and Mathew Williams
Biogeosciences, 20, 3301–3327, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3301-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3301-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Model–data fusion (MDF) allows us to combine ecosystem models with Earth observation data. Fragmented landscapes, with a mosaic of contrasting ecosystems, pose a challenge for MDF. We develop a novel MDF framework to estimate the carbon balance of fragmented landscapes and show the importance of accounting for ecosystem heterogeneity to prevent scale-dependent bias in estimated carbon fluxes, disturbance fluxes in particular, and to improve ecological fidelity of the calibrated models.
Alexander J. Norton, A. Anthony Bloom, Nicholas C. Parazoo, Paul A. Levine, Shuang Ma, Renato K. Braghiere, and T. Luke Smallman
Biogeosciences, 20, 2455–2484, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2455-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2455-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores how the representation of leaf phenology affects our ability to predict changes to the carbon balance of land ecosystems. We calibrate a new leaf phenology model against a diverse range of observations at six forest sites, showing that it improves the predictive capability of the processes underlying the ecosystem carbon balance. We then show how changes in temperature and rainfall affect the ecosystem carbon balance with this new model.
Xueying Yu, Dylan B. Millet, Daven K. Henze, Alexander J. Turner, Alba Lorente Delgado, A. Anthony Bloom, and Jianxiong Sheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3325–3346, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We combine satellite measurements with a novel downscaling method to map global methane emissions at 0.1°×0.1° resolution. These fine-scale emission estimates reveal unreported emission hotspots and shed light on the roles of agriculture, wetlands, and fossil fuels for regional methane budgets. The satellite-derived emissions point in particular to missing fossil fuel emissions in the Middle East and to a large emission underestimate in South Asia that appears to be tied to monsoon rainfall.
Ricardo Dalagnol, Lênio Soares Galvão, Fabien Hubert Wagner, Yhasmin Mendes de Moura, Nathan Gonçalves, Yujie Wang, Alexei Lyapustin, Yan Yang, Sassan Saatchi, and Luiz Eduardo Oliveira Cruz Aragão
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 345–358, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-345-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-345-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The AnisoVeg dataset brings 22 years of monthly satellite data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor for South America at 1 km resolution aimed at vegetation applications. It has nadir-normalized data, which is the most traditional approach to correct satellite data but also unique anisotropy data with strong biophysical meaning, explaining 55 % of Amazon forest height. We expect this dataset to help large-scale estimates of vegetation biomass and carbon.
Robert J. Parker, Chris Wilson, Edward Comyn-Platt, Garry Hayman, Toby R. Marthews, A. Anthony Bloom, Mark F. Lunt, Nicola Gedney, Simon J. Dadson, Joe McNorton, Neil Humpage, Hartmut Boesch, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Paul I. Palmer, and Dai Yamazaki
Biogeosciences, 19, 5779–5805, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane, one of the most important climate gases. The JULES land surface model simulates these emissions. We use satellite data to evaluate how well JULES reproduces the methane seasonal cycle over different tropical wetlands. It performs well for most regions; however, it struggles for some African wetlands influenced heavily by river flooding. We explain the reasons for these deficiencies and highlight how future development will improve these areas.
Brendan Byrne, Junjie Liu, Yonghong Yi, Abhishek Chatterjee, Sourish Basu, Rui Cheng, Russell Doughty, Frédéric Chevallier, Kevin W. Bowman, Nicholas C. Parazoo, David Crisp, Xing Li, Jingfeng Xiao, Stephen Sitch, Bertrand Guenet, Feng Deng, Matthew S. Johnson, Sajeev Philip, Patrick C. McGuire, and Charles E. Miller
Biogeosciences, 19, 4779–4799, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Plants draw CO2 from the atmosphere during the growing season, while respiration releases CO2 to the atmosphere throughout the year, driving seasonal variations in atmospheric CO2 that can be observed by satellites, such as the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2). Using OCO-2 XCO2 data and space-based constraints on plant growth, we show that permafrost-rich northeast Eurasia has a strong seasonal release of CO2 during the autumn, hinting at an unexpectedly large respiration signal from soils.
Vasileios Myrgiotis, Thomas Luke Smallman, and Mathew Williams
Biogeosciences, 19, 4147–4170, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4147-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4147-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that livestock grazing and grass cutting can determine whether a grassland is adding (source) or removing (sink) carbon (C) to/from the atmosphere. The annual C balance of 1855 managed grassland fields in Great Britain was quantified for 2017–2018 using process modelling and earth observation data. The examined fields were, on average, small C sinks, but the summer drought of 2018 led to a 9-fold increase in the number of fields that became C sources in 2018 compared to 2017.
John R. Worden, Daniel H. Cusworth, Zhen Qu, Yi Yin, Yuzhong Zhang, A. Anthony Bloom, Shuang Ma, Brendan K. Byrne, Tia Scarpelli, Joannes D. Maasakkers, David Crisp, Riley Duren, and Daniel J. Jacob
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6811–6841, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6811-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6811-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper is intended to accomplish two goals: 1) describe a new algorithm by which remotely sensed measurements of methane or other tracers can be used to not just quantify methane fluxes, but also attribute these fluxes to specific sources and regions and characterize their uncertainties, and 2) use this new algorithm to provide methane emissions by sector and country in support of the global stock take.
Russell Doughty, Thomas P. Kurosu, Nicholas Parazoo, Philipp Köhler, Yujie Wang, Ying Sun, and Christian Frankenberg
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1513–1529, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1513-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1513-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We describe and compare solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence data produced by NASA from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) and the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) and OCO-3 platforms.
Elias C. Massoud, A. Anthony Bloom, Marcos Longo, John T. Reager, Paul A. Levine, and John R. Worden
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1407–1423, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1407-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1407-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The water balance on river basin scales depends on a number of soil physical processes. Gaining information on these quantities using observations is a key step toward improving the skill of land surface hydrology models. In this study, we use data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (NASA-GRACE) to inform and constrain these hydrologic processes. We show that our model is able to simulate the land hydrologic cycle for a watershed in the Amazon from January 2003 to December 2012.
Yan Yang, A. Anthony Bloom, Shuang Ma, Paul Levine, Alexander Norton, Nicholas C. Parazoo, John T. Reager, John Worden, Gregory R. Quetin, T. Luke Smallman, Mathew Williams, Liang Xu, and Sassan Saatchi
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1789–1802, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1789-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1789-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Global carbon and water have large uncertainties that are hard to quantify in current regional and global models. Field observations provide opportunities for better calibration and validation of current modeling of carbon and water. With the unique structure of CARDAMOM, we have utilized the data assimilation capability and designed the benchmarking framework by using field observations in modeling. Results show that data assimilation improves model performance in different aspects.
Stephanie G. Stettz, Nicholas C. Parazoo, A. Anthony Bloom, Peter D. Blanken, David R. Bowling, Sean P. Burns, Cédric Bacour, Fabienne Maignan, Brett Raczka, Alexander J. Norton, Ian Baker, Mathew Williams, Mingjie Shi, Yongguang Zhang, and Bo Qiu
Biogeosciences, 19, 541–558, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-541-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-541-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Uncertainty in the response of photosynthesis to temperature poses a major challenge to predicting the response of forests to climate change. In this paper, we study how photosynthesis in a mountainous evergreen forest is limited by temperature. This study highlights that cold temperature is a key factor that controls spring photosynthesis. Including the cold-temperature limitation in an ecosystem model improved its ability to simulate spring photosynthesis.
Xiao Lu, Daniel J. Jacob, Haolin Wang, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Yuzhong Zhang, Tia R. Scarpelli, Lu Shen, Zhen Qu, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Hannah Nesser, A. Anthony Bloom, Shuang Ma, John R. Worden, Shaojia Fan, Robert J. Parker, Hartmut Boesch, Ritesh Gautam, Deborah Gordon, Michael D. Moran, Frances Reuland, Claudia A. Octaviano Villasana, and Arlyn Andrews
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 395–418, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-395-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-395-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate methane emissions and trends for 2010–2017 in the gridded national emission inventories for the United States, Canada, and Mexico by inversion of in situ and satellite methane observations. We find that anthropogenic methane emissions for all three countries are underestimated in the national inventories, largely driven by oil emissions. Anthropogenic methane emissions in the US peak in 2014, in contrast to the report of a steadily decreasing trend over 2010–2017 from the US EPA.
Thomas Luke Smallman, David Thomas Milodowski, Eráclito Sousa Neto, Gerbrand Koren, Jean Ometto, and Mathew Williams
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1191–1237, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1191-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1191-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Our study provides a novel assessment of model parameter, structure and climate change scenario uncertainty contribution to future predictions of the Brazilian terrestrial carbon stocks to 2100. We calibrated (2001–2017) five models of the terrestrial C cycle of varied structure. The calibrated models were then projected to 2100 under multiple climate change scenarios. Parameter uncertainty dominates overall uncertainty, being ~ 40 times that of either model structure or climate change scenario.
Zhen Qu, Daniel J. Jacob, Lu Shen, Xiao Lu, Yuzhong Zhang, Tia R. Scarpelli, Hannah Nesser, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Joannes D. Maasakkers, A. Anthony Bloom, John R. Worden, Robert J. Parker, and Alba L. Delgado
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14159–14175, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The recent launch of TROPOMI offers an unprecedented opportunity to quantify the methane budget from a top-down perspective. We use TROPOMI and the more mature GOSAT methane observations to estimate methane emissions and get consistent global budgets. However, TROPOMI shows biases over regions where surface albedo is small and provides less information for the coarse-resolution inversion due to the larger error correlations and spatial variations in the number of observations.
Yi Yin, Frederic Chevallier, Philippe Ciais, Philippe Bousquet, Marielle Saunois, Bo Zheng, John Worden, A. Anthony Bloom, Robert J. Parker, Daniel J. Jacob, Edward J. Dlugokencky, and Christian Frankenberg
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12631–12647, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12631-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12631-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The growth of methane, the second-most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide, has been accelerating in recent years. Using an ensemble of multi-tracer atmospheric inversions constrained by surface or satellite observations, we show that global methane emissions increased by nearly 1 % per year from 2010–2017, with leading contributions from the tropics and East Asia.
Dien Wu, John C. Lin, Henrique F. Duarte, Vineet Yadav, Nicholas C. Parazoo, Tomohiro Oda, and Eric A. Kort
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3633–3661, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3633-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3633-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A model (SMUrF) is presented that estimates biogenic CO2 fluxes over cities around the globe to separate out biogenic fluxes from anthropogenic emissions. The model leverages satellite-based solar-induced fluorescence data and a machine-learning technique. We evaluate the biogenic fluxes against flux observations and show contrasts between biogenic and anthropogenic fluxes over cities, revealing urban–rural flux gradients, diurnal cycles, and the resulting imprints on atmospheric-column CO2.
Anna B. Harper, Karina E. Williams, Patrick C. McGuire, Maria Carolina Duran Rojas, Debbie Hemming, Anne Verhoef, Chris Huntingford, Lucy Rowland, Toby Marthews, Cleiton Breder Eller, Camilla Mathison, Rodolfo L. B. Nobrega, Nicola Gedney, Pier Luigi Vidale, Fred Otu-Larbi, Divya Pandey, Sebastien Garrigues, Azin Wright, Darren Slevin, Martin G. De Kauwe, Eleanor Blyth, Jonas Ardö, Andrew Black, Damien Bonal, Nina Buchmann, Benoit Burban, Kathrin Fuchs, Agnès de Grandcourt, Ivan Mammarella, Lutz Merbold, Leonardo Montagnani, Yann Nouvellon, Natalia Restrepo-Coupe, and Georg Wohlfahrt
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3269–3294, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3269-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3269-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated 10 representations of soil moisture stress in the JULES land surface model against site observations of GPP and latent heat flux. Increasing the soil depth and plant access to deep soil moisture improved many aspects of the simulations, and we recommend these settings in future work using JULES. In addition, using soil matric potential presents the opportunity to include parameters specific to plant functional type to further improve modeled fluxes.
Yanlan Liu, Nataniel M. Holtzman, and Alexandra G. Konings
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2399–2417, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2399-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2399-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The flow of water through plants varies with species-specific traits. To determine how they vary across the world, we mapped the traits that best allowed a model to match microwave satellite data. We also defined average values across a few clusters of trait behavior. These form a tractable solution for use in large-scale models. Transpiration estimates using these clusters were more accurate than if using plant functional types. We expect our maps to improve transpiration forecasts.
Cited articles
Aguilos, M., Herault, B., Burban, B., Wagner, F., and Bonal, D.: What drives
long-term variations in carbon flux and balance in a tropical rainforest in
French Guiana?, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 253–254, 114–123,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.02.009, 2018.
Arora, V. K., Katavouta, A., Williams, R. G., Jones, C. D., Brovkin, V., Friedlingstein, P., Schwinger, J., Bopp, L., Boucher, O., Cadule, P., Chamberlain, M. A., Christian, J. R., Delire, C., Fisher, R. A., Hajima, T., Ilyina, T., Joetzjer, E., Kawamiya, M., Koven, C. D., Krasting, J. P., Law, R. M., Lawrence, D. M., Lenton, A., Lindsay, K., Pongratz, J., Raddatz, T., Séférian, R., Tachiiri, K., Tjiputra, J. F., Wiltshire, A., Wu, T., and Ziehn, T.: Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 17, 4173–4222, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020, 2020.
Atkin, O. K., Bloomfield, K. J., Reich, P. B., Tjoelker, M. G., Asner, G.
P., Bonal, D., Bönisch, G., Bradford, M. G., Cernusak, L. A., Cosio, E.
G., Creek, D., Crous, K. Y., Domingues, T. F., Dukes, J. S., Egerton, J. J.
G., Evans, J. R., Farquhar, G. D., Fyllas, N. M., Gauthier, P. P. G., Gloor,
E., Gimeno, T. E., Griffin, K. L., Guerrieri, R., Heskel, M. A.,
Huntingford, C., Ishida, F. Y., Kattge, J., Lambers, H., Liddell, M. J.,
Lloyd, J., Lusk, C. H., Martin, R. E., Maksimov, A. P., Maximov, T. C.,
Malhi, Y., Medlyn, B. E., Meir, P., Mercado, L. M., Mirotchnick, N., Ng, D.,
Niinemets, Ü., O'Sullivan, O. S., Phillips, O. L., Poorter, L., Poot,
P., Prentice, I. C., Salinas, N., Rowland, L. M., Ryan, M. G., Sitch, S.,
Slot, M., Smith, N. G., Turnbull, M. H., VanderWel, M. C., Valladares, F.,
Veneklaas, E. J., Weerasinghe, L. K., Wirth, C., Wright, I. J., Wythers, K.
R., Xiang, J., Xiang, S., and Zaragoza-Castells, J.: Global variability in
leaf respiration in relation to climate, plant functional types and leaf
traits, New Phytol., 206, 614–636, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13253, 2015.
Atkin, O. K., Bahar, N., Bloomfield, K., Griffin, K. L., Heskel, M. A.,
Huntingford, C., and de la Torre, A. M.: Plant Respiration: Metabolic Fluxes
and Carbon Balance, edited by: Tcherkez, G. and Ghashghaie, J., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 302 pp.,
2017.
Bacour, C., Peylin, P., MacBean, N., Rayner, P. J., Delage, F., Chevallier,
F., Weiss, M., Demarty, J., Santaren, D., Baret, F., Berveiller, D.,
Dufrêne, E., and Prunet, P.: Joint assimilation of eddy covariance flux
measurements and FAPAR products over temperate forests within a
process-oriented biosphere model, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 120,
1839–1857, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG002966, 2015.
Baldocchi, D.: An analytical solution for coupled leaf photosynthesis and
stomatal conductance models, Tree Physiol., 14, 1069–1079,
https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.1069, 1994.
Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., and Berry, J. A.: A model predicting stomatal
conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under
different environmental conditions, in: Progress in Photosynthesis Research,
Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 221–224, 1987.
Berbigier, P., Bonnefond, J., and Mellmann, P.: CO2 and water vapour fluxes for 2 years above Euroflux forest site, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 108, 183–197, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00240-4, 2001.
Beringer, J., Hutley, L. B., Tapper, N. J., and Cernusak, L. A.: Savanna
fires and their impact on net ecosystem productivity in North Australia,
Global Change Biol., 13, 990–1004, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01334.x, 2007.
Berzaghi, F., Wright, I. J., Kramer, K., Oddou-Muratorio, S., Bohn, F. J.,
Reyer, C. P. O., Sabaté, S., Sanders, T. G. M., and Hartig, F.: Towards
a New Generation of Trait-Flexible Vegetation Models, Trends Ecol. Evol.,
35, 191–205, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.11.006, 2020.
Beven, K.: Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological
modelling, Adv. Water Resour., 16, 41–51,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E, 1993.
Beven, K. and Freer, J.: Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty
estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using
the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 249, 11–29,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8, 2001.
Bloom, A. A. and Williams, M.: Constraining ecosystem carbon dynamics in a data-limited world: integrating ecological “common sense” in a model–data fusion framework, Biogeosciences, 12, 1299–1315, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1299-2015, 2015.
Bloom, A. A., Exbrayat, J.-F., van der Velde, I. R., Feng, L., and Williams,
M.: The decadal state of the terrestrial carbon cycle: Global retrievals of
terrestrial carbon allocation, pools, and residence times, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 1285–1290, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515160113, 2016.
Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., Liu, J., Konings, A. G., Worden, J. R., Parazoo, N. C., Meyer, V., Reager, J. T., Worden, H. M., Jiang, Z., Quetin, G. R., Smallman, T. L., Exbrayat, J.-F., Yin, Y., Saatchi, S. S., Williams, M., and Schimel, D. S.: Lagged effects regulate the inter-annual variability of the tropical carbon balance, Biogeosciences, 17, 6393–6422, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6393-2020, 2020.
Bonan, G. B.: Importance of leaf area index and forest type when estimating
photosynthesis in boreal forests, Remote Sens. Environ., 43, 303–314, 1993.
Bonan, G. B. (Ed.): Terrestrial Biosphere Models, in: Climate Change and
Terrestrial Ecosystem Modeling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
UK, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107339217.002, 2019.
Bonan, G. B. and Doney, S. C.: Climate, ecosystems, and planetary futures:
The challenge to predict life in Earth system models, Science, 359,
eaam8328, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8328, 2018.
Bonan, G. B., Williams, M., Fisher, R. A., and Oleson, K. W.: Modeling stomatal conductance in the earth system: linking leaf water-use efficiency and water transport along the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2193–2222, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2193-2014, 2014.
Butler, E. E., Datta, A., Flores-Moreno, H., Chen, M., Wythers, K. R.,
Fazayeli, F., Banerjee, A., Atkin, O. K., Kattge, J., Amiaud, B., Blonder,
B., Boenisch, G., Bond-Lamberty, B., Brown, K. A., Byun, C., Campetella, G.,
Cerabolini, B. E. L., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Craine, J. M., Craven, D., de Vries, F. T., Díaz, S., Domingues, T. F., Forey, E., González-Melo, A., Gross, N., Han, W., Hattingh, W. N., Hickler, T., Jansen, S., Kramer, K., Kraft, N. J. B., Kurokawa, H., Laughlin, D. C., Meir, P., Minden, V., Niinemets, Ü., Onoda, Y., Peñuelas, J., Read, Q., Sack, L., Schamp, B., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Spasojevic, M. J., Sosinski, E., Thornton, P. E., Valladares, F., van Bodegom, P. M., Williams, M., Wirth, C., and Reich, P. B.: Mapping local and global variability in plant trait distributions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 10937–10946,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708984114, 2017.
Caprice, A. (Ed.): The Ultimate Quotable Einstein, Princeton University
Press, Princeton, NJ, 608 pp., 2013.
Collalti, A. and Prentice, I. C.: Is NPP proportional to GPP? Waring's
hypothesis 20 years on, Tree Physiol., 39, 1473–1483,
https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpz034, 2019.
Collalti, A., Ibrom, A., Stockmarr, A., Cescatti, A., Alkama, R.,
Fernández-Martínez, M., Matteucci, G., Sitch, S., Friedlingstein,
P., Ciais, P., Goll, D. S., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Pongratz, J., Arneth, A.,
Haverd, V., and Prentice, I. C.: Forest production efficiency increases with
growth temperature, Nat. Commun., 11, 5322,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19187-w, 2020.
Dietze, M. C., Fox, A., Beck-Johnson, L. M., Betancourt, J. L., Hooten, M.
B., Jarnevich, C. S., Keitt, T. H., Kenney, M. A., Laney, C. M., Larsen, L.
G., Loescher, H. W., Lunch, C. K., Pijanowski, B. C., Randerson, J. T.,
Read, E. K., Tredennick, A. T., Vargas, R., Weathers, K. C., and White, E.
P.: Iterative near-term ecological forecasting: Needs, opportunities, and
challenges, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 1424–1432,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710231115, 2018.
Exbrayat, J.-F., Smallman, T. L., Bloom, A. A., Hutley, L. B., and Williams,
M.: Inverse Determination of the Influence of Fire on Vegetation Carbon
Turnover in the Pantropics, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 1776–1789,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005925, 2018.
Exbrayat, J.-F., Bloom, A. A., Carvalhais, N., Fischer, R., Huth, A.,
MacBean, N., and Williams, M.: Understanding the Land Carbon Cycle with
Space Data: Current Status and Prospects, Surv. Geophys., 40, 735–755,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09506-2, 2019.
Famiglietti, C.: NEE and LAI prediction metrics for DALEC model suite (COMPLEX experiment), https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13409096.v1 (last access: 23 April 2021) [Dataset], 2020.
Famiglietti, C.: COMPLEX Analysis Code, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4716391 [Dataset], last access: 23 April 2021.
Fang, H., Jiang, C., Li, W., Wei, S., Baret, F., Chen, J. M., Garcia-Haro,
J., Liang, S., Liu, R., Myneni, R. B., Pinty, B., Xiao, Z., and Zhu, Z.:
Characterization and intercomparison of global moderate resolution leaf area
index (LAI) products: Analysis of climatologies and theoretical
uncertainties, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 529–548,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20051, 2013.
Feng, X.: Marching in step: The importance of matching model complexity to
data availability in terrestrial biosphere models, Global Change Biol., 26,
3190–3192, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15090, 2020.
Fer, I., Kelly, R., Moorcroft, P. R., Richardson, A. D., Cowdery, E. M., and Dietze, M. C.: Linking big models to big data: efficient ecosystem model calibration through Bayesian model emulation, Biogeosciences, 15, 5801–5830, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5801-2018, 2018.
Fisher, J. B., Huntzinger, D. N., Schwalm, C. R., and Sitch, S.: Modeling
the Terrestrial Biosphere, Annu. Rev. Env. Resour., 39, 91–123,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012913-093456, 2014.
Fisher, R. A. and Koven, C. D.: Perspectives on the future of Land Surface
Models and the challenges of representing complex terrestrial systems, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2018MS001453, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001453, 2020.
Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Anderegg, W. R. L., Christoffersen, B. O.,
Dietze, M. C., Farrior, C. E., Holm, J. A., Hurtt, G. C., Knox, R. G.,
Lawrence, P. J., Lichstein, J. W., Longo, M., Matheny, A. M., Medvigy, D.,
Muller-Landau, H. C., Powell, T. L., Serbin, S. P., Sato, H., Shuman, J. K.,
Smith, B., Trugman, A. T., Viskari, T., Verbeeck, H., Weng, E., Xu, C., Xu,
X., Zhang, T., and Moorcroft, P. R.: Vegetation demographics in Earth System
Models: A review of progress and priorities, Global Change Biol., 24, 35–54,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13910, 2018.
Fisher, R. A., Wieder, W. R., Sanderson, B. M., Koven, C. D., Oleson, K. W.,
Xu, C., Fisher, J. B., Shi, M., Walker, A. P., and Lawrence, D. M.:
Parametric Controls on Vegetation Responses to Biogeochemical Forcing in the
CLM5, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 2879–2895,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001609, 2019.
Flack-Prain, S., Meir, P., Malhi, Y., Smallman, T. L., and Williams, M.:
Does economic optimisation explain LAI and leaf trait distributions across an Amazon soil moisture gradient?, Global Change Biol., 27, 587–605, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15368, 2021.
Forkel, M., Migliavacca, M., Thonicke, K., Reichstein, M., Schaphoff, S.,
Weber, U., and Carvalhais, N.: Codominant water control on global
interannual variability and trends in land surface phenology and greenness,
Global Change Biol., 21, 3414–3435,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12950, 2015.
Fox, A., Williams, M., Richardson, A. D., Cameron, D., Gove, J. H., Quaife,
T., Ricciuto, D., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., and Trudinger, C. M.: The
REFLEX project: Comparing different algorithms and implementations for the
inversion of a terrestrial ecosystem model against eddy covariance data,
Agr. Forest Meteorol., 149, 1597–1615, 2009.
Friedlingstein, P., Meinshausen, M., Arora, V. K., Jones, C. D., Anav, A.,
Liddicoat, S. K., and Knutti, R.: Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections
due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks, J. Climate, 27, 511–526,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00579.1, 2013.
Fuster, B., Sánchez-Zapero, J., Camacho, F., García-Santos, V.,
Verger, A., Lacaze, R., Weiss, M., Baret, F., and Smets, B.: Quality
Assessment of PROBA-V LAI, fAPAR and fCOVER Collection 300 m Products of
Copernicus Global Land Service, Remote Sens., 12, 1017, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061017, 2020.
Fyllas, N. M., Gloor, E., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Quesada, C. A., Domingues, T. F., Galbraith, D. R., Torre-Lezama, A., Vilanova, E., Ramírez-Angulo, H., Higuchi, N., Neill, D. A., Silveira, M., Ferreira, L., Aymard C., G. A., Malhi, Y., Phillips, O. L., and Lloyd, J.: Analysing Amazonian forest productivity using a new individual and trait-based model (TFS v.1), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1251–1269, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1251-2014, 2014.
Gaudinski, J. B., Trumbore, S. E., Davidson, E. A., and Zheng, S.: Soil
carbon cycling in a temperate forest: radiocarbon-based estimates of
residence times, sequestration rates and partitioning of fluxes,
Biogeochemistry, 51, 33–69, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006301010014, 2000.
Ginzburg, L. R. and Jensen, C. X. J.: Rules of thumb for judging ecological
theories, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 121–126, 2004.
Haario, H., Saksman, E., and Tamminen, J.: An adaptive Metropolis algorithm, Bernoulli,
7, 223–242, https://doi.org/10.2307/3318737, 2001.
Hawkins, D. M.: The problem of overfitting, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 44,
1–12, 2004.
Heimann, M. and Reichstein, M.: Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and
climate feedbacks, Nature, 451, 289–292,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06591, 2008.
Hill, T. C., Ryan, E., and Williams, M.: The use of CO2 flux time series for parameter and carbon stock estimation in carbon cycle research, Global Change Biol., 18, 179–193, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02511.x, 2012.
Huntzinger, D. N., Schwalm, C., Michalak, A. M., Schaefer, K., King, A. W., Wei, Y., Jacobson, A., Liu, S., Cook, R. B., Post, W. M., Berthier, G., Hayes, D., Huang, M., Ito, A., Lei, H., Lu, C., Mao, J., Peng, C. H., Peng, S., Poulter, B., Riccuito, D., Shi, X., Tian, H., Wang, W., Zeng, N., Zhao, F., and Zhu, Q.: The North American Carbon Program Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and experimental design, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 2121–2133, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-2121-2013, 2013.
Jia, W., Zhang, H., He, X., and Wu, Q.: Gaussian Weighted Histogram
Intersection for License Plate Classification, in: 18th International
Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06), 20–24 August 2006, Hong Kong, China, 574–577,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2006.596, 2006.
Jiang, C., Ryu, Y., Wang, H., and Keenan, T. F.: An optimality-based model
explains seasonal variation in C3 plant photosynthetic capacity, Global Change Biol., 26, 6493–6510, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15276, 2020.
Jolly, W. M., Graham, J. M., Michaelis, A., Nemani, R., and Running, S. W.:
A flexible, integrated system for generating meteorological surfaces derived
from point sources across multiple geographic scales, Environ. Modell. Softw., 20, 873–882, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.05.003, 2005.
Kattge, J., Bönisch, G., Díaz, S.,
et al.: TRY plant trait database – enhanced coverage and open access, Global Change Biol., 26, 119–188, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14904, 2020.
Keenan, T. F., Carbone, M. S., Reichstein, M., and Richardson, A. D.: The
model-data fusion pitfall: assuming certainty in an uncertain world,
Oecologia, 167, 587, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2106-x, 2011.
Keenan, T. F., Davidson, E. A., Munger, J. W., and Richardson, A. D.: Rate
my data: quantifying the value of ecological data for the development of
models of the terrestrial carbon cycle, Ecol. Appl., 23, 273–286,
https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0747.1, 2013.
Kennedy, D., Swenson, S., Oleson, K. W., Lawrence, D. M., Fisher, R., Lola
da Costa, A. C., and Gentine, P.: Implementing Plant Hydraulics in the
Community Land Model, Version 5, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 485–513,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001500, 2019.
Konings, A. G., Bloom, A. A., Liu, J., Parazoo, N. C., Schimel, D. S., and Bowman, K. W.: Global satellite-driven estimates of heterotrophic respiration, Biogeosciences, 16, 2269–2284, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2269-2019, 2019.
Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson, S.
C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K., Bonan,
G. B., and Slater, A. G.: Parameterization improvements and functional and
structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 3, M03001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045, 2011.
LeBauer, D. S., Wang, D., Richter, K. T., Davidson, C. C., and Dietze, M.
C.: Facilitating feedbacks between field measurements and ecosystem models,
Ecol. Monogr., 83, 133–154, https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0137.1, 2013.
Lever, J., Krzywinski, M., and Altman, N.: Model selection and overfitting,
Nat. Methods, 13, 703–704, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3968, 2016.
López-Blanco, E., Exbrayat, J.-F., Lund, M., Christensen, T. R., Tamstorf, M. P., Slevin, D., Hugelius, G., Bloom, A. A., and Williams, M.: Evaluation of terrestrial pan-Arctic carbon cycling using a data-assimilation system, Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 233–255, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-233-2019, 2019.
Lovenduski, N. S. and Bonan, G. B.: Reducing uncertainty in projections of
terrestrial carbon uptake, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 44020,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa66b8, 2017.
Luo, Y., Keenan, T. F., and Smith, M.: Predictability of the terrestrial
carbon cycle, Global Change Biol., 21, 1737–1751, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12766, 2015.
MacBean, N., Peylin, P., Chevallier, F., Scholze, M., and Schürmann, G.: Consistent assimilation of multiple data streams in a carbon cycle data assimilation system, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3569–3588, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3569-2016, 2016.
MacBean, N., Maignan, F., Bacour, C., Lewis, P., Peylin, P., Guanter, L.,
Köhler, P., Gómez-Dans, J., and Disney, M.: Strong constraint on
modelled global carbon uptake using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence
data, Sci. Rep.-UK, 8, 1973, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20024-w, 2018.
Maji, S., Berg, A. C., and Malik, J.: Classification using intersection
kernel support vector machines is efficient, in: 2008 IEEE Conference on
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 23–28 June 2008, Anchorage, AK, USA, 1–8,
https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587630, 2008.
Munger, W. and Wofsy, S.: Biomass Inventories at Harvard Forest EMS Tower
since 1993 (version 33), Environmental Data Initiative,
https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/, 2020a.
Munger, W. and Wofsy, S.: Canopy-Atmosphere Exchange of Carbon, Water and
Energy at Harvard Forest EMS Tower since 1991 (version 31),Environmental Data Initiative, https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/, 2020b.
Norton, A. J., Rayner, P. J., Koffi, E. N., Scholze, M., Silver, J. D., and Wang, Y.-P.: Estimating global gross primary productivity using chlorophyll fluorescence and a data assimilation system with the BETHY-SCOPE model, Biogeosciences, 16, 3069–3093, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3069-2019, 2019.
Oleson, K. W., Lawrence, D. M., Bonan, G. B., Flanner, M. G., Kluzek, E.,
Lawrence, P. J., Levis, S., Swenson, S. C., Thornton, P. E., and Dai, A.:
Technical description of version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM), NCAR
Tech., Notes (NCAR/TN-478+ STR), https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RR1W7M, 2010.
Pastorello, G., Trotta, C., Canfora, E., et al.: The
FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance
data, Sci. Data, 7, 225, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0534-3, 2020.
Pavlick, R., Drewry, D. T., Bohn, K., Reu, B., and Kleidon, A.: The Jena Diversity-Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (JeDi-DGVM): a diverse approach to representing terrestrial biogeography and biogeochemistry based on plant functional trade-offs, Biogeosciences, 10, 4137–4177, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4137-2013, 2013.
Peaucelle, M., Bacour, C., Ciais, P., Vuichard, N., Kuppel, S.,
Peñuelas, J., Belelli Marchesini, L., Blanken, P. D., Buchmann, N.,
Chen, J., Delpierre, N., Desai, A. R., Dufrene, E., Gianelle, D.,
Gimeno-Colera, C., Gruening, C., Helfter, C., Hörtnagl, L., Ibrom, A.,
Joffre, R., Kato, T., Kolb, T. E., Law, B., Lindroth, A., Mammarella, I.,
Merbold, L., Minerbi, S., Montagnani, L., Šigut, L., Sutton, M.,
Varlagin, A., Vesala, T., Wohlfahrt, G., Wolf, S., Yakir, D., and Viovy, N.:
Covariations between plant functional traits emerge from constraining
parameterization of a terrestrial biosphere model, Global Ecol. Biogeogr.,
28, 1351–1365, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12937, 2019.
Peylin, P., Bacour, C., MacBean, N., Leonard, S., Rayner, P., Kuppel, S., Koffi, E., Kane, A., Maignan, F., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., and Prunet, P.: A new stepwise carbon cycle data assimilation system using multiple data streams to constrain the simulated land surface carbon cycle, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3321–3346, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3321-2016, 2016.
Prentice, I. C., Liang, X., Medlyn, B. E., and Wang, Y.-P.: Reliable, robust and realistic: the three R's of next-generation land-surface modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5987–6005, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5987-2015, 2015.
Quetin, G. R., Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., and Konings, A. G.: Carbon Flux
Variability From a Relatively Simple Ecosystem Model With Assimilated Data
Is Consistent With Terrestrial Biosphere Model Estimates, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001889, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001889, 2020.
Rambal, S., Joffre, R., Ourcival, J. M., Cavender-Bares, J., and Rocheteau,
A.: The growth respiration component in eddy CO2 flux from a Quercus ilex mediterranean forest, Global Change Biol., 10, 1460–1469,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00819.x, 2004.
Raoult, N. M., Jupp, T. E., Cox, P. M., and Luke, C. M.: Land-surface parameter optimisation using data assimilation techniques: the adJULES system V1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2833–2852, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2833-2016, 2016.
Rayner, P. J., Scholze, M., Knorr, W., Kaminski, T., Giering, R., and
Widmann, H.: Two decades of terrestrial carbon fluxes from a carbon cycle
data assimilation system (CCDAS), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB2026,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002254, 2005.
Reich, P. B., Tjoelker, M. G., Pregitzer, K. S., Wright, I. J., Oleksyn, J.,
and Machado, J.-L.: Scaling of respiration to nitrogen in leaves, stems and
roots of higher land plants, Ecol. Lett., 11, 793–801,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01185.x, 2008.
Ryan, M. G.: Effects of Climate Change on Plant Respiration, Ecol. Appl., 1,
157–167, https://doi.org/10.2307/1941808, 1991.
Sakschewski, B., von Bloh, W., Boit, A., Rammig, A., Kattge, J., Poorter,
L., Peñuelas, J., and Thonicke, K.: Leaf and stem economics spectra
drive diversity of functional plant traits in a dynamic global vegetation
model, Global Change Biol., 21, 2711–2725,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12870, 2015.
Sandel, B., Gutiérrez, A. G., Reich, P. B., Schrodt, F., Dickie, J., and
Kattge, J.: Estimating themissing species bias in plant trait measurements,
J. Veg. Sci., 26, 828–838, https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12292, 2015.
Scheiter, S., Langan, L., and Higgins, S. I.: Next-generation dynamic global
vegetation models: learning from community ecology, New Phytol., 198,
957–969, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12210, 2013.
Schimel, D. S., Pavlick, R., Fisher, J. B., Asner, G. P., Saatchi, S. S.,
Townsend, P., Miller, C., Frankenberg, C., Hibbard, K., and Cox, P.:
Observing terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle from space, Global Change Biol., 21, 1762, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12822, 2015.
Scholze, M., Buchwitz, M., Dorigo, W., Guanter, L., and Quegan, S.: Reviews and syntheses: Systematic Earth observations for use in terrestrial carbon cycle data assimilation systems, Biogeosciences, 14, 3401–3429, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3401-2017, 2017.
Schürmann, G. J., Kaminski, T., Köstler, C., Carvalhais, N., Voßbeck, M., Kattge, J., Giering, R., Rödenbeck, C., Heimann, M., and Zaehle, S.: Constraining a land-surface model with multiple observations by application of the MPI-Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System V1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2999–3026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2999-2016, 2016.
Schwalm, C. R., Schaefer, K., Fisher, J. B., Huntzinger, D., Elshorbany, Y.,
Fang, Y., Hayes, D., Jafarov, E., Michalak, A. M., Piper, M., Stofferahn,
E., Wang, K., and Wei, Y.: Divergence in land surface modeling: linking
spread to structure, Environ. Res. Commun., 1, 111004,
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ab4a8a, 2019.
Schwalm, C. R., Huntzinger, D. N., Michalak, A. M., Schaefer, K., Fisher, J.
B., Fang, Y., and Wei, Y.: Modeling suggests fossil fuel emissions have been
driving increased land carbon uptake since the turn of the 20th Century,
Sci. Rep.-UK, 10, 9059, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66103-9, 2020.
Sellers, P. J., Berry, J. A., Collatz, G. J., Field, C. B., and Hall, F. G.:
Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis, and transpiration – III. A reanalysis
using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme, Remote
Sens. Environ., 42, 187–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(92)90102-P, 1992.
Shi, Z., Crowell, S., Luo, Y., and Moore, B.: Model structures amplify
uncertainty in predicted soil carbon responses to climate change, Nat.
Commun., 9, 2171, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04526-9, 2018.
Shiklomanov, A. N., Bond-Lamberty, B., Atkins, J. W., and Gough, C. M.:
Structure and parameter uncertainty in centennial projections of forest
community structure and carbon cycling, Global Change Biol., 26, 6080–6096,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15164, 2020.
Smallman, T. L. and Williams, M.: Description and validation of an intermediate complexity model for ecosystem photosynthesis and evapotranspiration: ACM-GPP-ETv1, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2227–2253, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2227-2019, 2019.
Smallman, T. L., Moncrieff, J. B., and Williams, M.: WRFv3.2-SPAv2: development and validation of a coupled ecosystem–atmosphere model, scaling from surface fluxes of CO2 and energy to atmospheric profiles, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1079–1093, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1079-2013, 2013.
Smallman, T. L., Exbrayat, J.-F., Mencuccini, M., Bloom, A. A., and
Williams, M.: Assimilation of repeated woody biomass observations constrains
decadal ecosystem carbon cycle uncertainty in aggrading forests, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122, 528–545,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003520, 2017.
Smith, N. G., Keenan, T. F., Colin Prentice, I., Wang, H., Wright, I. J.,
Niinemets, Ü., Crous, K. Y., Domingues, T. F., Guerrieri, R., Yoko Ishida, F., Kattge, J., Kruger, E. L., Maire, V., Rogers, A., Serbin, S. P., Tarvainen, L., Togashi, H. F., Townsend, P. A., Wang, M., Weerasinghe, L.
K., and Zhou, S.-X.: Global photosynthetic capacity is optimized to the
environment, Ecol. Lett., 22, 506–517, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13210,
2019.
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M. M. B., Allen, S. K.,
Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M.: Climate
Change 2013: The physical science basis, in: Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of IPCC the intergovernmental panel on climate
change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, 1535 pp.,
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324, 2014.
Suni, T., Rinne, J., Reissell, A., Altimir, N., Keronen, P., Rannik, Ü.,
Maso, M. D., Kulmala, M., and Vesala, T.: Long-term measurements of surface
fluxes above a Scots pine forest in Hyytiälä, southern Finland,
1996–2001, Boreal Environ. Res., 8, 287–301, 2003.
Thomas, R. Q. and Williams, M.: A model using marginal efficiency of investment to analyze carbon and nitrogen interactions in terrestrial ecosystems (ACONITE Version 1), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2015–2037, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2015-2014, 2014.
Thomas, R. Q., Jersild, A. L., Brooks, E. B., Thomas, V. A., and Wynne, R.
H.: A mid-century ecological forecast with partitioned uncertainty predicts
increases in loblolly pine forest productivity, Ecol. Appl., 28, 1503–1519,
https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1761, 2018.
Thomas, R. Q., Williams, M., Cavaleri, M. A., Exbrayat, J.-F., Smallman, T.
L., and Street, L. E.: Alternate Trait-Based Leaf Respiration Schemes
Evaluated at Ecosystem-Scale Through Carbon Optimization Modeling and Canopy
Property Data, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 4629–4644,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001679, 2019.
van Bodegom, P. M., Douma, J. C., Witte, J. P. M., Ordoñez, J. C.,
Bartholomeus, R. P., and Aerts, R.: Going beyond limitations of plant
functional types when predicting global ecosystem–atmosphere fluxes:
exploring the merits of traits-based approaches, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 21,
625–636, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00717.x, 2012.
van Bodegom, P. M., Douma, J. C., and Verheijen, L. M.: A fully traits-based
approach to modeling global vegetation distribution, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 13733–13738, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304551110, 2014.
Verger, A., Baret, F., and Weiss, M.: Near Real-Time Vegetation Monitoring
at Global Scale, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl., 7, 3473–3481, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2328632, 2014.
Verheijen, L. M., Brovkin, V., Aerts, R., Bönisch, G., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Kattge, J., Reich, P. B., Wright, I. J., and van Bodegom, P. M.: Impacts of trait variation through observed trait–climate relationships on performance of an Earth system model: a conceptual analysis, Biogeosciences, 10, 5497–5515, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5497-2013, 2013.
Walker, A. P., Quaife, T., van Bodegom, P. M., De Kauwe, M. G., Keenan, T.
F., Joiner, J., Lomas, M. R., MacBean, N., Xu, C., Yang, X., and Woodward,
F. I.: The impact of alternative trait-scaling hypotheses for the maximum
photosynthetic carboxylation rate (Vcmax) on global gross primary
production, New Phytol., 215, 1370–1386,
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14623, 2017.
Wang, H., Atkin, O. K., Keenan, T. F., Smith, N. G., Wright, I. J.,
Bloomfield, K. J., Kattge, J., Reich, P. B., and Prentice, I. C.:
Acclimation of leaf respiration consistent with optimal photosynthetic
capacity, Global Change Biol., 26, 2573–2583,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14980, 2020.
Waring, R. H. and Schlesinger, W. H.: Forest ecosystems, Concepts and
Management, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, USA, 340 pp., 1985.
Waring, R. H., Landsberg, J. J., and Williams, M.: Net primary production of
forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production?, Tree Physiol.,
18, 129–134, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/18.2.129, 1998.
White, E. P., Yenni, G. M., Taylor, S. D., Christensen, E. M., Bledsoe, E.
K., Simonis, J. L., and Ernest, S. K. M.: Developing an automated iterative
near-term forecasting system for an ecological study, Methods Ecol. Evol.,
10, 332–344, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13104, 2019.
Williams, M., Rastetter, E. B., Fernandes, D. N., Goulden, M. L., Wofsy, S.
C., Shaver, G. R., Melillo, J. M., Munger, J. W., Fan, S.-M., and
Nadelhoffer, K. J.: Modelling the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in a
Quercus–Acer stand at Harvard Forest: the regulation of stomatal
conductance by light, nitrogen and soil/plant hydraulic properties,
Plant Cell Environ., 19, 911–927, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00456.x, 1996.
Williams, M., Rastetter, E. B., Fernandes, D. N., Goulden, M. L., Shaver, G.
R., and Johnson, L. C.: Predicting gross primary productivity in terrestrial
ecosystems, Ecol. Appl., 7, 882–894,
https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0882:PGPPIT]2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Williams, M., Law, B. E., Anthoni, P. M., and Unsworth, M. H.: Use of a
simulation model and ecosystem flux data to examine carbon–water
interactions in ponderosa pine, Tree Physiol., 21, 287–298,
https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/21.5.287, 2001.
Williams, M., Schwarz, P. A., Law, B. E., Irvine, J., and Kurpius, M. R.: An
improved analysis of forest carbon dynamics using data assimilation, Global Change Biol., 11, 89–105, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00891.x,
2005.
Wu, G., Cai, X., Keenan, T. F., Li, S., Luo, X., Fisher, J. B., Cao, R., Li,
F., Purdy, A. J., Zhao, W., Sun, X., and Hu, Z.: Evaluating three
evapotranspiration estimates from model of different complexity over China
using the ILAMB benchmarking system, J. Hydrol., 125553,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125553, 2020a.
Wu, G., Hu, Z., Keenan, T. F., Li, S., Zhao, W., Cao, R. C., Li, Y., Guo,
Q., and Sun, X.: Incorporating spatial variations in parameters for
improvements of an evapotranspiration model, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 125, e2019JG005504, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005504, 2020b.
Yin, Y., Bloom, A. A., Worden, J., Saatchi, S., Yang, Y., Williams, M., Liu,
J., Jiang, Z., Worden, H., Bowman, K., Frankenberg, C., and Schimel, D.:
Fire decline in dry tropical ecosystems enhances decadal land carbon sink,
Nat. Commun., 11, 1900, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15852-2, 2020.
Zhao, Y., Chen, X., Smallman, T. L., Flack-Prain, S., Milodowski, D. T., and
Williams, M.: Characterizing the Error and Bias of Remotely Sensed LAI
Products: An Example for Tropical and Subtropical Evergreen Forests in South
China, 12, 3122, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12193122, 2020.
Short summary
Model uncertainty dominates the spread in terrestrial carbon cycle predictions. Efforts to reduce it typically involve adding processes, thereby increasing model complexity. However, if and how model performance scales with complexity is unclear. Using a suite of 16 structurally distinct carbon cycle models, we find that increased complexity only improves skill if parameters are adequately informed. Otherwise, it can degrade skill, and an intermediate-complexity model is optimal.
Model uncertainty dominates the spread in terrestrial carbon cycle predictions. Efforts to...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint