Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 18, issue 2
Articles | Volume 18, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-367-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-367-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 2
Research article
 | 
18 Jan 2021
Research article |  | 18 Jan 2021

Machine learning estimates of eddy covariance carbon flux in a scrub in the Mexican highland

Aurelio Guevara-Escobar, Enrique González-Sosa, Mónica Cervantes-Jiménez, Humberto Suzán-Azpiri, Mónica Elisa Queijeiro-Bolaños, Israel Carrillo-Ángeles, and Víctor Hugo Cambrón-Sandoval

Viewed

Total article views: 4,861 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,562 1,191 108 4,861 106 127
  • HTML: 3,562
  • PDF: 1,191
  • XML: 108
  • Total: 4,861
  • BibTeX: 106
  • EndNote: 127
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jan 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jan 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,861 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,595 with geography defined and 266 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 25 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
All vegetation types can sequester carbon dioxide. We compared ground measurements (eddy covariance) with remotely sensed data (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, MODIS) and machine learning ensembles of primary production in a semiarid scrub in Mexico. The annual carbon sink for this vegetation type was −283.5 g C m−2 y−1; MODIS underestimated the primary productivity, and the machine learning modeling was better locally.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint