Articles | Volume 18, issue 20
Biogeosciences, 18, 5639–5668, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5639-2021
Biogeosciences, 18, 5639–5668, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5639-2021

Research article 20 Oct 2021

Research article | 20 Oct 2021

Assessing the representation of the Australian carbon cycle in global vegetation models

Lina Teckentrup et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,823 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,347 449 27 1,823 19 18
  • HTML: 1,347
  • PDF: 449
  • XML: 27
  • Total: 1,823
  • BibTeX: 19
  • EndNote: 18
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,669 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,669 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 19 Jan 2022
Download
Short summary
The Australian continent is included in global assessments of the carbon cycle such as the global carbon budget, yet the performance of dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) over Australia has rarely been evaluated. We assessed simulations by an ensemble of dynamic global vegetation models over Australia and highlighted a number of key areas that lead to model divergence on both short (inter-annual) and long (decadal) timescales.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint