Articles | Volume 18, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5639-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5639-2021
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
20 Oct 2021
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 20 Oct 2021

Assessing the representation of the Australian carbon cycle in global vegetation models

Lina Teckentrup, Martin G. De Kauwe, Andrew J. Pitman, Daniel S. Goll, Vanessa Haverd, Atul K. Jain, Emilie Joetzjer, Etsushi Kato, Sebastian Lienert, Danica Lombardozzi, Patrick C. McGuire, Joe R. Melton, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Julia Pongratz, Stephen Sitch, Anthony P. Walker, and Sönke Zaehle

Viewed

Total article views: 5,212 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,026 1,110 76 5,212 84 72
  • HTML: 4,026
  • PDF: 1,110
  • XML: 76
  • Total: 5,212
  • BibTeX: 84
  • EndNote: 72
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,212 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,944 with geography defined and 268 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
The Australian continent is included in global assessments of the carbon cycle such as the global carbon budget, yet the performance of dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) over Australia has rarely been evaluated. We assessed simulations by an ensemble of dynamic global vegetation models over Australia and highlighted a number of key areas that lead to model divergence on both short (inter-annual) and long (decadal) timescales.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint