Articles | Volume 18, issue 20
Biogeosciences, 18, 5639–5668, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5639-2021
Biogeosciences, 18, 5639–5668, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5639-2021

Research article 20 Oct 2021

Research article | 20 Oct 2021

Assessing the representation of the Australian carbon cycle in global vegetation models

Lina Teckentrup et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on bg-2021-66', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Jun 2021
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lina Teckentrup, 30 Aug 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on bg-2021-66', Ben Bond-Lamberty, 05 Aug 2021
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Lina Teckentrup, 30 Aug 2021

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (03 Sep 2021) by Ben Bond-Lamberty
AR by Lina Teckentrup on behalf of the Authors (08 Sep 2021)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (14 Sep 2021) by Ben Bond-Lamberty
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (21 Sep 2021)
ED: Publish as is (22 Sep 2021) by Ben Bond-Lamberty
Download
Short summary
The Australian continent is included in global assessments of the carbon cycle such as the global carbon budget, yet the performance of dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) over Australia has rarely been evaluated. We assessed simulations by an ensemble of dynamic global vegetation models over Australia and highlighted a number of key areas that lead to model divergence on both short (inter-annual) and long (decadal) timescales.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint