Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 19, issue 6
Articles | Volume 19, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1753-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1753-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 6
Research article
 | 
28 Mar 2022
Research article |  | 28 Mar 2022

Influence of plant ecophysiology on ozone dry deposition: comparing between multiplicative and photosynthesis-based dry deposition schemes and their responses to rising CO2 level

Shihan Sun, Amos P. K. Tai, David H. Y. Yung, Anthony Y. H. Wong, Jason A. Ducker, and Christopher D. Holmes

Viewed

Total article views: 2,864 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,117 672 75 2,864 208 64 82
  • HTML: 2,117
  • PDF: 672
  • XML: 75
  • Total: 2,864
  • Supplement: 208
  • BibTeX: 64
  • EndNote: 82
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Oct 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Oct 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,864 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,723 with geography defined and 141 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
We developed and used a terrestrial biosphere model to compare and evaluate widely used empirical dry deposition schemes with different stomatal approaches and found that using photosynthesis-based stomatal approaches can reduce biases in modeled dry deposition velocities in current chemical transport models. Our study shows systematic errors in current dry deposition schemes and the importance of representing plant ecophysiological processes in models under a changing climate.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint