Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-8-5505-2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-8-5505-2011
09 Jun 2011
 | 09 Jun 2011
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal BG but the revision was not accepted.

Contributions of agricultural plants and soils to N2O emission in a farmland

J. Li, X. Lee, Q. Yu, X. Tong, Z. Qin, and B. Macdonald

Abstract. The goal of this study was to quantify the roles of plants and soil in the N2O budget of a cropland in North China. Plant and soil N2O fluxes were measured with transparent and dark plant chambers and soil chambers, respectively, in three adjacent fields of fertilized cotton, fertilized maize and unfertilized soybean. During the observation period, the soil flux was 448 ± 89, 230 ± 74 and 90 ± 14 μg N2O m−2 h−1 in cotton, maize and soybean fields, respectively. The plant flux was 54 ± 43 and 16 ± 41 μg N2O m−2 h−1, about 10 % and 26 % to the total ecosystem flux, for the cotton and the soybean field, respectively. Ignoring the contribution of plants would cause an obvious underestimation on the ecosystem N2O flux. The influence of sunlight on plant N2O flux was insignificant. However, in the cotton field, the responses of the plant N2O flux to air temperature and soil ammonium content were significant under sunlight but insignificant under darkness, suggesting that stomatal activity might influence the release process. In the cotton field, temperature sensitivity of plant N2O emission was 1.13, much lower than the value of soil flux (5.74). No relationship was found between plant N2O flux and soil nitrate content. It was implied that nitrate reduction in plants might not be the main source of plant N2O emission under field conditions. The seasonal patterns of the soil and plant N2O emissions were similarly affected by fertilization, indicating that plants might serve as a passive conduit transporting N2O produced in the soil.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
J. Li, X. Lee, Q. Yu, X. Tong, Z. Qin, and B. Macdonald
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
J. Li, X. Lee, Q. Yu, X. Tong, Z. Qin, and B. Macdonald
J. Li, X. Lee, Q. Yu, X. Tong, Z. Qin, and B. Macdonald

Viewed

Total article views: 1,826 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
974 773 79 1,826 58 62
  • HTML: 974
  • PDF: 773
  • XML: 79
  • Total: 1,826
  • BibTeX: 58
  • EndNote: 62
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Download
Altmetrics