the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Living coccolithophores from the eastern equatorial Indian Ocean during the spring intermonsoon: Indicators of hydrography
Abstract. We studied the biodiversity of autotrophic calcareous coccolithophore assemblages at 30 locations in the eastern equatorial Indian Ocean (EEIO) (80°–94° E, 6° N–5° S) and evaluated the importance of regional hydrology. We found 25 taxa of coccospheres and 17 taxa of coccoliths. The coccolithophore community was dominated by Gephyrocapsa oceanica, Emiliania huxleyi, Florisphaera profunda, Umbilicosphaera sibogae, and Helicosphaera carteri. The abundance of coccoliths and coccospheres ranged from 0.192×103 to 161.709×103 coccoliths l−1 and 0.192×103 to 68.365×103 cells l−1, averaged at 22.658×103 coccoliths l−1 and 9.386×103 cells l−1, respectively. Biogenic PIC, POC, and rain ratio mean values were 0.498 μgC l−1, 1.047 μgC l−1, and 0.990 respectively. High abundances of both coccoliths and coccospheres in the surface ocean layer occurred north of the equator. Vertically, the great majority of coccoliths and coccospheres were concentrated in water less than 75 m deep. The ratios between the number of coccospheres and free coccoliths across four transects indicated a pattern that varied among different oceanographic settings. The H’ and J values of coccospheres were similar compared with those of coccoliths. Abundant coccolithophores along the equator) mainly occurred west of 90° E, which was in accordance with the presence of Wyrtki jets (WJs). F. profunda was not found in surface water, indicating a stratified and stable water system. U. irregularis dominated in the equatorial zone, suggesting oligotrophic water conditions. Coccosphere distribution was explained by environmental variables, indicated by multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) ordination in response variables and principal components analysis (PCA) ordination in explanatory variables. Coccolithophore distribution was related to temperature, salinity, density and chlorophyll a.
- Preprint
(1655 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
-
RC1: 'Reviewer Comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Jun 2017
-
AC1: 'reply to the comment of reviewer one', Jun Sun, 01 Jul 2017
- RC2: 'Revised manuscript - comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Jul 2017
-
AC1: 'reply to the comment of reviewer one', Jun Sun, 01 Jul 2017
- AC2: 'Rely to reviewer 2', Jun Sun, 07 Jul 2017
- RC3: 'Comments on Manuscript by Jun Sung et al. “Living coccolithophores from the eastern equatorial Indian Ocean during the spring intermonsoon: Indicators of hydrography”', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Aug 2017
-
RC1: 'Reviewer Comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Jun 2017
-
AC1: 'reply to the comment of reviewer one', Jun Sun, 01 Jul 2017
- RC2: 'Revised manuscript - comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Jul 2017
-
AC1: 'reply to the comment of reviewer one', Jun Sun, 01 Jul 2017
- AC2: 'Rely to reviewer 2', Jun Sun, 07 Jul 2017
- RC3: 'Comments on Manuscript by Jun Sung et al. “Living coccolithophores from the eastern equatorial Indian Ocean during the spring intermonsoon: Indicators of hydrography”', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Aug 2017
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
845 | 336 | 99 | 1,280 | 66 | 81 |
- HTML: 845
- PDF: 336
- XML: 99
- Total: 1,280
- BibTeX: 66
- EndNote: 81
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1