Articles | Volume 12, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5365-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5365-2015
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
17 Sep 2015
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 17 Sep 2015

Comment on "Solute-specific scaling of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in streams" by Hall et al. (2013)

R. González-Pinzón, J. Mortensen, and D. Van Horn

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (Editor review) (17 Aug 2015) by Katja Fennel
AR by Ricardo González-Pinzón on behalf of the Authors (03 Sep 2015)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (03 Sep 2015) by Katja Fennel
AR by Ricardo González-Pinzón on behalf of the Authors (03 Sep 2015)
Short summary
Hall et al. (2013) presented a synthesis of 969 nutrient tracer experiments and used a scaling method to test the hypothesis that nutrient demand is constant with increasing stream size. In this comment we present a reanalysis of a subset of the data used by Hall et al. (2013) and propose that their correlations between nutrient uptake lengths and specific discharge are inadvertently spurious. Therefore, the conclusions derived from such correlations are debatable.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint