Articles | Volume 12, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5563-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5563-2015
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
30 Sep 2015
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 30 Sep 2015

Sharp ecotones spark sharp ideas: comment on "Structural, physiognomic and above-ground biomass variation in savanna–forest transition zones on three continents – how different are co-occurring savanna and forest formations?" by Veenendaal et al. (2015)

A. Staal and B. M. Flores

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (Editor review) (16 Sep 2015) by Michael Bahn
AR by Arie Staal on behalf of the Authors (16 Sep 2015)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (22 Sep 2015) by Michael Bahn
AR by Arie Staal on behalf of the Authors (22 Sep 2015)
Download
Short summary
Remote sensing studies indicate that tropical forest and savanna can be alternative stable states maintained by a feedback between tree cover and fire. Veenendaal et al. (2015) attempted to refute this hypothesis with an extensive field study of the vegetation structure and soil conditions at forest–savanna transition zones. With a re-analysis of their data and a conceptual model, we show that in fact the results agree with the idea of forest–savanna bistability.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint