Articles | Volume 17, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5587-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5587-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Ideas and perspectives: enhancing the impact of the FLUXNET network of eddy covariance sites
DIBAF, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, 01100, Italy
Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC), Lecce, 73100,
Italy
Viewed
Total article views: 4,829 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jun 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,375 | 1,348 | 106 | 4,829 | 147 | 209 |
- HTML: 3,375
- PDF: 1,348
- XML: 106
- Total: 4,829
- BibTeX: 147
- EndNote: 209
Total article views: 3,673 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Nov 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,646 | 939 | 88 | 3,673 | 122 | 178 |
- HTML: 2,646
- PDF: 939
- XML: 88
- Total: 3,673
- BibTeX: 122
- EndNote: 178
Total article views: 1,156 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jun 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 729 | 409 | 18 | 1,156 | 25 | 31 |
- HTML: 729
- PDF: 409
- XML: 18
- Total: 1,156
- BibTeX: 25
- EndNote: 31
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,829 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,689 with geography defined
and 140 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,673 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,464 with geography defined
and 209 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,156 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,156 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
30 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Resolving heterogeneous fluxes from tundra halves the growing season carbon budget S. Ludwig et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1301-2024
- Ideas and perspectives: Enhancing research and monitoring of carbon pools and land-to-atmosphere greenhouse gases exchange in developing countries D. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1435-2022
- Insights into terrestrial carbon and water cycling from the global eddy covariance network J. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-025-00743-1
- Atmospheric effects are stronger than soil moisture in restricting net CO2 uptake of managed grasslands in New Zealand J. Goodrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109822
- Carbon–Water Coupling in Forest Ecosystems Under Climate Change: Advances in Water Use Efficiency and Sustainability Perspectives X. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219501
- Impact of Climate Warming on Cropland Water Use Efficiency in Northeast China Based on BESS Satellite Data F. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081223
- A Normalization-Calibration Model for Multi-Source Ground-Based FPAR Observations in Mountainous Forests Y. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17233797
- Light use efficiency models incorporating diffuse radiation impacts for simulating terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity: A global comparison H. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109376
- Empirical upscaling of OzFlux eddy covariance for high-resolution monitoring of terrestrial carbon uptake in Australia C. Burton et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4109-2023
- Real-world wintertime CO, N2O, and CO2 emissions of a central European village L. Haszpra et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5019-2022
- NDVI or PPI: A (Quick) Comparison for Vegetation Dynamics Monitoring in Mountainous Area D. Charrière et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203894
- A pre-whitening with block-bootstrap cross-correlation procedure for temporal alignment of data sampled by eddy covariance systems D. Vitale et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-024-00615-9
- Carbon Flux Measurement Supersites of the Russian Federation: Objectives, Methodology, Prospects A. Olchev & S. Gulev https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433824700841
- Global trends in land-atmosphere CO<SUB>2</SUB> exchange fluxes: an analysis of a flux measurement dataset and comparison with terrestrial model simulations A. ITO https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-21-00015
- Potential for equation discovery with AI in the climate sciences C. Huntingford et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-475-2025
- Flux Footprints: A Critical Link to Bridge Eddy‐Covariance Measurements With Models, Remote Sensing, and Other Observations H. Chu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70887
- Intercomparison of methods to estimate gross primary production based on CO2 and COS flux measurements K. Kohonen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4067-2022
- Technical note: A view from space on global flux towers by MODIS and Landsat: the FluxnetEO data set S. Walther et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2805-2022
- Satellite remote sensing and artificial intelligence for livestock greenhouse gas benchmarking: measurement, attribution, and verification challenges P. Prajesh et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5VA00425J
- Disentangling Turbulent Gas Diffusion from Non-diffusive Transport in the Boundary Layer A. Kowalski et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00605-5
- Introducing ‘miniRECgap’ R package for simple gap-filling of missing eddy covariance CO2 flux measurements with classic nonlinear environmental response functions via GUI-supported R-scripts (case-study: In-sample gap-filling with ‘miniRECgap’ vs. MDS and an optimised shallow ANN in a ‘challenging’ peatland ecosystem) A. Premrov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106611
- Gap-filling eddy covariance methane fluxes: Comparison of machine learning model predictions and uncertainties at FLUXNET-CH4 wetlands J. Irvin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108528
- Declining resilience of forest carbon sinks linked to increased atmospheric water deficit during droughts in the Northern Hemisphere X. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ada170
- Paddy rice methane emissions across Monsoon Asia Z. Ouyang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113335
- Predictive value of soil moisture and concurrent variables in the multivariate modelling of cereal yields in water-limited environments J. Gaona et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108280
- Impact of filtering methods on ultrafine particles turbulent fluxes by eddy covariance G. Pappaccogli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119237
- An Ecosystem-Scale Flux Measurement Strategy to Assess Natural Climate Solutions K. Hemes et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06421
- Warming and Drought Weaken the Carbon Sink Capacity of an Endangered Paleoendemic Temperate Rainforest in South America J. Perez‐Quezada et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG007258
- AmeriFlux BASE data pipeline to support network growth and data sharing H. Chu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02531-2
- The spatial and environmental distribution of the global eddy covariance tower network P. Stoy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-026-03183-8
30 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Resolving heterogeneous fluxes from tundra halves the growing season carbon budget S. Ludwig et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1301-2024
- Ideas and perspectives: Enhancing research and monitoring of carbon pools and land-to-atmosphere greenhouse gases exchange in developing countries D. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1435-2022
- Insights into terrestrial carbon and water cycling from the global eddy covariance network J. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-025-00743-1
- Atmospheric effects are stronger than soil moisture in restricting net CO2 uptake of managed grasslands in New Zealand J. Goodrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109822
- Carbon–Water Coupling in Forest Ecosystems Under Climate Change: Advances in Water Use Efficiency and Sustainability Perspectives X. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219501
- Impact of Climate Warming on Cropland Water Use Efficiency in Northeast China Based on BESS Satellite Data F. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081223
- A Normalization-Calibration Model for Multi-Source Ground-Based FPAR Observations in Mountainous Forests Y. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17233797
- Light use efficiency models incorporating diffuse radiation impacts for simulating terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity: A global comparison H. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109376
- Empirical upscaling of OzFlux eddy covariance for high-resolution monitoring of terrestrial carbon uptake in Australia C. Burton et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4109-2023
- Real-world wintertime CO, N2O, and CO2 emissions of a central European village L. Haszpra et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5019-2022
- NDVI or PPI: A (Quick) Comparison for Vegetation Dynamics Monitoring in Mountainous Area D. Charrière et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203894
- A pre-whitening with block-bootstrap cross-correlation procedure for temporal alignment of data sampled by eddy covariance systems D. Vitale et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-024-00615-9
- Carbon Flux Measurement Supersites of the Russian Federation: Objectives, Methodology, Prospects A. Olchev & S. Gulev https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433824700841
- Global trends in land-atmosphere CO<SUB>2</SUB> exchange fluxes: an analysis of a flux measurement dataset and comparison with terrestrial model simulations A. ITO https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-21-00015
- Potential for equation discovery with AI in the climate sciences C. Huntingford et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-475-2025
- Flux Footprints: A Critical Link to Bridge Eddy‐Covariance Measurements With Models, Remote Sensing, and Other Observations H. Chu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70887
- Intercomparison of methods to estimate gross primary production based on CO2 and COS flux measurements K. Kohonen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4067-2022
- Technical note: A view from space on global flux towers by MODIS and Landsat: the FluxnetEO data set S. Walther et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2805-2022
- Satellite remote sensing and artificial intelligence for livestock greenhouse gas benchmarking: measurement, attribution, and verification challenges P. Prajesh et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5VA00425J
- Disentangling Turbulent Gas Diffusion from Non-diffusive Transport in the Boundary Layer A. Kowalski et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00605-5
- Introducing ‘miniRECgap’ R package for simple gap-filling of missing eddy covariance CO2 flux measurements with classic nonlinear environmental response functions via GUI-supported R-scripts (case-study: In-sample gap-filling with ‘miniRECgap’ vs. MDS and an optimised shallow ANN in a ‘challenging’ peatland ecosystem) A. Premrov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106611
- Gap-filling eddy covariance methane fluxes: Comparison of machine learning model predictions and uncertainties at FLUXNET-CH4 wetlands J. Irvin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108528
- Declining resilience of forest carbon sinks linked to increased atmospheric water deficit during droughts in the Northern Hemisphere X. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ada170
- Paddy rice methane emissions across Monsoon Asia Z. Ouyang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113335
- Predictive value of soil moisture and concurrent variables in the multivariate modelling of cereal yields in water-limited environments J. Gaona et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108280
- Impact of filtering methods on ultrafine particles turbulent fluxes by eddy covariance G. Pappaccogli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119237
- An Ecosystem-Scale Flux Measurement Strategy to Assess Natural Climate Solutions K. Hemes et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06421
- Warming and Drought Weaken the Carbon Sink Capacity of an Endangered Paleoendemic Temperate Rainforest in South America J. Perez‐Quezada et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG007258
- AmeriFlux BASE data pipeline to support network growth and data sharing H. Chu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02531-2
- The spatial and environmental distribution of the global eddy covariance tower network P. Stoy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-026-03183-8
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 13 Jun 2026
Short summary
FLUXNET is a large, bottom-up, self-coordinated network of sites. It provided ecosystem–atmosphere greenhouse gas fluxes from stations around the world that were used as bases for a large number of publications and studies. Today many applications require recent updates on the data to track more closely the ecosystem responses to climate change and link ground data with satellite programs. For this reason, a new organization of FLUXNET is needed, keeping as its target the FAIR principles.
FLUXNET is a large, bottom-up, self-coordinated network of sites. It provided...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint