Articles | Volume 18, issue 4
Biogeosciences, 18, 1407–1415, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1407-2021
Biogeosciences, 18, 1407–1415, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1407-2021
Technical note
24 Feb 2021
Technical note | 24 Feb 2021

Technical note: Interpreting pH changes

Andrea J. Fassbender et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 3,328 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,300 995 33 3,328 232 27 41
  • HTML: 2,300
  • PDF: 995
  • XML: 33
  • Total: 3,328
  • Supplement: 232
  • BibTeX: 27
  • EndNote: 41
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Oct 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,868 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,861 with geography defined and 7 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 28 Jun 2022
Download
Short summary
A decline in upper-ocean pH with time is typically ascribed to ocean acidification. A more quantitative interpretation is often confused by failing to recognize the implications of pH being a logarithmic transform of hydrogen ion concentration rather than an absolute measure. This can lead to an unwitting misinterpretation of pH data. We provide three real-world examples illustrating this and recommend the reporting of both hydrogen ion concentration and pH in studies of ocean chemical change.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint