Articles | Volume 18, issue 1
Biogeosciences, 18, 95–112, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-95-2021
Biogeosciences, 18, 95–112, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-95-2021

Research article 07 Jan 2021

Research article | 07 Jan 2021

Improving the representation of high-latitude vegetation distribution in dynamic global vegetation models

Peter Horvath et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,122 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
802 295 25 1,122 110 20 28
  • HTML: 802
  • PDF: 295
  • XML: 25
  • Total: 1,122
  • Supplement: 110
  • BibTeX: 20
  • EndNote: 28
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jun 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jun 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,020 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,016 with geography defined and 4 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 21 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
We evaluated the performance of three methods for representing vegetation cover. Remote sensing provided the best match to a reference dataset, closely followed by distribution modelling (DM), whereas the dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) in CLM4.5BGCDV deviated strongly from the reference. Sensitivity tests show that use of threshold values for predictors identified by DM may improve DGVM performance. The results highlight the potential of using DM in the development of DGVMs.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint