Articles | Volume 19, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2245-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Evaluating alternative ebullition models for predicting peatland methane emission and its pathways via data–model fusion
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 27 Apr 2022)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 20 Dec 2021)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on bg-2021-316', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Jan 2022
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Shuang Ma, 11 Mar 2022
- AC3: 'References used in replies to reviewers' comments', Shuang Ma, 11 Mar 2022
-
RC2: 'Review of "Evaluating alternative ebullition models for predicting peatland methane emission and its pathways via data-model fusion" by Ma et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Feb 2022
- AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Shuang Ma, 10 Mar 2022
- AC4: 'References used in replies to reviewers' comments', Shuang Ma, 11 Mar 2022
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (16 Mar 2022) by Akihiko Ito
![](https://www.biogeosciences.net/graphic_grey_open_symbol_running_text.jpg)
AR by Shuang Ma on behalf of the Authors (17 Mar 2022) 
Author's response
Manuscript
EF by Sarah Buchmann (18 Mar 2022)
Author's tracked changes
ED: Publish as is (28 Mar 2022) by Akihiko Ito
![](https://www.biogeosciences.net/graphic_grey_open_symbol_running_text.jpg)